Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma

Standard

Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma. / Wentrup, Robert; Winkelmann, Nicola; Mitroshkin, Andrey; Prager, Matthias; Voderholzer, Winfried; Schachschal, Guido; Jürgensen, Christian; Büning, Carsten.

in: GUT LIVER, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 3, 23.05.2016, S. 470-5.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Wentrup, R, Winkelmann, N, Mitroshkin, A, Prager, M, Voderholzer, W, Schachschal, G, Jürgensen, C & Büning, C 2016, 'Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma', GUT LIVER, Jg. 10, Nr. 3, S. 470-5. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl15175

APA

Wentrup, R., Winkelmann, N., Mitroshkin, A., Prager, M., Voderholzer, W., Schachschal, G., Jürgensen, C., & Büning, C. (2016). Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma. GUT LIVER, 10(3), 470-5. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl15175

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6bf812691c9b4637b840ab8d8353b605,
title = "Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma",
abstract = "BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treated with either PDT plus chemotherapy (PTD-C) or PDT monotherapy (PDT-M). The primary endpoint was the mean overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints included the 1-year survival rate, risk of cholangitic complications, and outcomes, which were evaluated according to the chemotherapy protocol.RESULTS: More than 90% of the study population had advanced hilar NCC Bismuth type III or IV. In the PDT-M group (n=35), the mean survival time was 374 days compared with 520 days in the PDT-C group (n=33, p=0.021). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PDT-C group compared with the PDT-M group (88% vs 58%, p=0.001) with a significant reduction of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.58; p=0.003). Gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in a shorter survival time compared with the gemcitabine combination therapy (mean, 395 days vs 566 days; p=0.09). Cholangitic complications were observed at a similar frequency in the PDT-C and PDT-M groups.CONCLUSIONS: Combining repeated PDT with a gemcitabine-based combination therapy might offer a significant survival benefit in patients with hilar NCC.",
keywords = "Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Cholangiocarcinoma, Cisplatin, Combined Modality Therapy, Deoxycytidine, Endoscopy, Digestive System, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Organoplatinum Compounds, Photochemotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stents, Treatment Outcome, Comparative Study, Journal Article",
author = "Robert Wentrup and Nicola Winkelmann and Andrey Mitroshkin and Matthias Prager and Winfried Voderholzer and Guido Schachschal and Christian J{\"u}rgensen and Carsten B{\"u}ning",
year = "2016",
month = may,
day = "23",
doi = "10.5009/gnl15175",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "470--5",
journal = "GUT LIVER",
issn = "1976-2283",
publisher = "Joe Bok Chung",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Photodynamic Therapy Plus Chemotherapy Compared with Photodynamic Therapy Alone in Hilar Nonresectable Cholangiocarcinoma

AU - Wentrup, Robert

AU - Winkelmann, Nicola

AU - Mitroshkin, Andrey

AU - Prager, Matthias

AU - Voderholzer, Winfried

AU - Schachschal, Guido

AU - Jürgensen, Christian

AU - Büning, Carsten

PY - 2016/5/23

Y1 - 2016/5/23

N2 - BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treated with either PDT plus chemotherapy (PTD-C) or PDT monotherapy (PDT-M). The primary endpoint was the mean overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints included the 1-year survival rate, risk of cholangitic complications, and outcomes, which were evaluated according to the chemotherapy protocol.RESULTS: More than 90% of the study population had advanced hilar NCC Bismuth type III or IV. In the PDT-M group (n=35), the mean survival time was 374 days compared with 520 days in the PDT-C group (n=33, p=0.021). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PDT-C group compared with the PDT-M group (88% vs 58%, p=0.001) with a significant reduction of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.58; p=0.003). Gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in a shorter survival time compared with the gemcitabine combination therapy (mean, 395 days vs 566 days; p=0.09). Cholangitic complications were observed at a similar frequency in the PDT-C and PDT-M groups.CONCLUSIONS: Combining repeated PDT with a gemcitabine-based combination therapy might offer a significant survival benefit in patients with hilar NCC.

AB - BACKGROUND/AIMS: Standard treatments are not available for hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma (NCC). It is unknown whether combination therapy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) plus systemic chemotherapy is superior to PDT alone.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with hilar NCC treated with either PDT plus chemotherapy (PTD-C) or PDT monotherapy (PDT-M). The primary endpoint was the mean overall survival rate. Secondary endpoints included the 1-year survival rate, risk of cholangitic complications, and outcomes, which were evaluated according to the chemotherapy protocol.RESULTS: More than 90% of the study population had advanced hilar NCC Bismuth type III or IV. In the PDT-M group (n=35), the mean survival time was 374 days compared with 520 days in the PDT-C group (n=33, p=0.021). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the PDT-C group compared with the PDT-M group (88% vs 58%, p=0.001) with a significant reduction of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.58; p=0.003). Gemcitabine monotherapy resulted in a shorter survival time compared with the gemcitabine combination therapy (mean, 395 days vs 566 days; p=0.09). Cholangitic complications were observed at a similar frequency in the PDT-C and PDT-M groups.CONCLUSIONS: Combining repeated PDT with a gemcitabine-based combination therapy might offer a significant survival benefit in patients with hilar NCC.

KW - Aged

KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

KW - Bile Duct Neoplasms

KW - Cholangiocarcinoma

KW - Cisplatin

KW - Combined Modality Therapy

KW - Deoxycytidine

KW - Endoscopy, Digestive System

KW - Female

KW - Fluorouracil

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Organoplatinum Compounds

KW - Photochemotherapy

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Stents

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.5009/gnl15175

DO - 10.5009/gnl15175

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26814610

VL - 10

SP - 470

EP - 475

JO - GUT LIVER

JF - GUT LIVER

SN - 1976-2283

IS - 3

ER -