Phase-specific manipulation of rhythmic brain activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation

Standard

Phase-specific manipulation of rhythmic brain activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation. / Fiene, Marina; Schwab, Bettina C; Misselhorn, Jonas; Herrmann, Christoph S; Schneider, Till R; Engel, Andreas K.

in: BRAIN STIMUL, Jahrgang 13, Nr. 5, 14.06.2020, S. 1254-1262.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{4091e42d8ddb43559fe69ed7f5e28ca3,
title = "Phase-specific manipulation of rhythmic brain activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Oscillatory phase has been proposed as a key parameter defining the spatiotemporal structure of neural activity. To enhance our understanding of brain rhythms and improve clinical outcomes in pathological conditions, modulation of neural activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) emerged as a promising approach. However, the phase-specificity of tACS effects in humans is still critically debated.OBJECTIVE: Here, we investigated the phase-specificity of tACS on visually evoked steady state responses (SSRs) in 24 healthy human participants.METHODS: We used an intermittent electrical stimulation protocol and assessed the influence of tACS on SSR amplitude in the interval immediately following tACS. A neural network model served to validate the plausibility of experimental findings.RESULTS: We observed a modulation of SSR amplitudes dependent on the phase shift between flicker and tACS. The tACS effect size was negatively correlated with the strength of flicker-evoked activity. Supported by simulations, data suggest that strong network synchronization limits further neuromodulation by tACS. Neural sources of phase-specific effects were localized in the parieto-occipital cortex within flicker-entrained regions. Importantly, the optimal phase shift between flicker and tACS associated with strongest SSRs was correlated with SSR phase delays in the tACS target region.CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data provide electrophysiological evidence for phase-specific modulations of rhythmic brain activity by tACS in humans. As the optimal timing of tACS application was dependent on cortical SSR phase delays, our data suggest that tACS effects were not mediated by retinal co-stimulation. These findings highlight the potential of tACS for controlled, phase-specific modulations of neural activity.",
author = "Marina Fiene and Schwab, {Bettina C} and Jonas Misselhorn and Herrmann, {Christoph S} and Schneider, {Till R} and Engel, {Andreas K}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.008",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1254--1262",
journal = "BRAIN STIMUL",
issn = "1935-861X",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phase-specific manipulation of rhythmic brain activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation

AU - Fiene, Marina

AU - Schwab, Bettina C

AU - Misselhorn, Jonas

AU - Herrmann, Christoph S

AU - Schneider, Till R

AU - Engel, Andreas K

N1 - Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/6/14

Y1 - 2020/6/14

N2 - BACKGROUND: Oscillatory phase has been proposed as a key parameter defining the spatiotemporal structure of neural activity. To enhance our understanding of brain rhythms and improve clinical outcomes in pathological conditions, modulation of neural activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) emerged as a promising approach. However, the phase-specificity of tACS effects in humans is still critically debated.OBJECTIVE: Here, we investigated the phase-specificity of tACS on visually evoked steady state responses (SSRs) in 24 healthy human participants.METHODS: We used an intermittent electrical stimulation protocol and assessed the influence of tACS on SSR amplitude in the interval immediately following tACS. A neural network model served to validate the plausibility of experimental findings.RESULTS: We observed a modulation of SSR amplitudes dependent on the phase shift between flicker and tACS. The tACS effect size was negatively correlated with the strength of flicker-evoked activity. Supported by simulations, data suggest that strong network synchronization limits further neuromodulation by tACS. Neural sources of phase-specific effects were localized in the parieto-occipital cortex within flicker-entrained regions. Importantly, the optimal phase shift between flicker and tACS associated with strongest SSRs was correlated with SSR phase delays in the tACS target region.CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data provide electrophysiological evidence for phase-specific modulations of rhythmic brain activity by tACS in humans. As the optimal timing of tACS application was dependent on cortical SSR phase delays, our data suggest that tACS effects were not mediated by retinal co-stimulation. These findings highlight the potential of tACS for controlled, phase-specific modulations of neural activity.

AB - BACKGROUND: Oscillatory phase has been proposed as a key parameter defining the spatiotemporal structure of neural activity. To enhance our understanding of brain rhythms and improve clinical outcomes in pathological conditions, modulation of neural activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) emerged as a promising approach. However, the phase-specificity of tACS effects in humans is still critically debated.OBJECTIVE: Here, we investigated the phase-specificity of tACS on visually evoked steady state responses (SSRs) in 24 healthy human participants.METHODS: We used an intermittent electrical stimulation protocol and assessed the influence of tACS on SSR amplitude in the interval immediately following tACS. A neural network model served to validate the plausibility of experimental findings.RESULTS: We observed a modulation of SSR amplitudes dependent on the phase shift between flicker and tACS. The tACS effect size was negatively correlated with the strength of flicker-evoked activity. Supported by simulations, data suggest that strong network synchronization limits further neuromodulation by tACS. Neural sources of phase-specific effects were localized in the parieto-occipital cortex within flicker-entrained regions. Importantly, the optimal phase shift between flicker and tACS associated with strongest SSRs was correlated with SSR phase delays in the tACS target region.CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data provide electrophysiological evidence for phase-specific modulations of rhythmic brain activity by tACS in humans. As the optimal timing of tACS application was dependent on cortical SSR phase delays, our data suggest that tACS effects were not mediated by retinal co-stimulation. These findings highlight the potential of tACS for controlled, phase-specific modulations of neural activity.

U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.008

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32534253

VL - 13

SP - 1254

EP - 1262

JO - BRAIN STIMUL

JF - BRAIN STIMUL

SN - 1935-861X

IS - 5

ER -