Persistent Physical Symptoms as Perceptual Dysregulation: A Neuropsychobehavioral Model and Its Clinical Implications

Standard

Persistent Physical Symptoms as Perceptual Dysregulation: A Neuropsychobehavioral Model and Its Clinical Implications. / Henningsen, Peter; Gündel, Harald; Kop, Willem J; Löwe, Bernd; Martin, Alexandra; Rief, Winfried; Rosmalen, Judith G M; Schröder, Andreas; van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina; Van den Bergh, Omer; EURONET-SOMA Group.

in: PSYCHOSOM MED, Jahrgang 80, Nr. 5, 06.2018, S. 422-431.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

Henningsen, P, Gündel, H, Kop, WJ, Löwe, B, Martin, A, Rief, W, Rosmalen, JGM, Schröder, A, van der Feltz-Cornelis, C, Van den Bergh, O & EURONET-SOMA Group 2018, 'Persistent Physical Symptoms as Perceptual Dysregulation: A Neuropsychobehavioral Model and Its Clinical Implications', PSYCHOSOM MED, Jg. 80, Nr. 5, S. 422-431. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000588

APA

Henningsen, P., Gündel, H., Kop, W. J., Löwe, B., Martin, A., Rief, W., Rosmalen, J. G. M., Schröder, A., van der Feltz-Cornelis, C., Van den Bergh, O., & EURONET-SOMA Group (2018). Persistent Physical Symptoms as Perceptual Dysregulation: A Neuropsychobehavioral Model and Its Clinical Implications. PSYCHOSOM MED, 80(5), 422-431. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000588

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{be0958bbea9341b7bf9311e88677e9fe,
title = "Persistent Physical Symptoms as Perceptual Dysregulation: A Neuropsychobehavioral Model and Its Clinical Implications",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms underlying the perception and experience of persistent physical symptoms are not well understood, and in the models, the specific relevance of peripheral input versus central processing, or of neurobiological versus psychosocial factors in general, is not clear. In this article, we proposed a model for this clinical phenomenon that is designed to be coherent with an underlying, relatively new model of the normal brain functions involved in the experience of bodily signals.METHODS: Based on a review of recent literature, we describe central elements of this model and its clinical implications.RESULTS: In the model, the brain is seen as an active predictive processing or inferential device rather than one that is passively waiting for sensory input. A central aspect of the model is the attempt of the brain to minimize prediction errors that result from constant comparisons of predictions and sensory input. Two possibilities exist: adaptation of the generative model underlying the predictions or alteration of the sensory input via autonomic nervous activation (in the case of interoception). Following this model, persistent physical symptoms can be described as {"}failures of inference{"} and clinically well-known factors such as expectation are assigned a role, not only in the later amplification of bodily signals but also in the very basis of symptom perception.CONCLUSIONS: We discuss therapeutic implications of such a model including new interpretations for established treatments as well as new options such as virtual reality techniques combining exteroceptive and interoceptive information.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Peter Henningsen and Harald G{\"u}ndel and Kop, {Willem J} and Bernd L{\"o}we and Alexandra Martin and Winfried Rief and Rosmalen, {Judith G M} and Andreas Schr{\"o}der and {van der Feltz-Cornelis}, Christina and {Van den Bergh}, Omer and {EURONET-SOMA Group}",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1097/PSY.0000000000000588",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "422--431",
journal = "PSYCHOSOM MED",
issn = "0033-3174",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Persistent Physical Symptoms as Perceptual Dysregulation: A Neuropsychobehavioral Model and Its Clinical Implications

AU - Henningsen, Peter

AU - Gündel, Harald

AU - Kop, Willem J

AU - Löwe, Bernd

AU - Martin, Alexandra

AU - Rief, Winfried

AU - Rosmalen, Judith G M

AU - Schröder, Andreas

AU - van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina

AU - Van den Bergh, Omer

AU - EURONET-SOMA Group

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms underlying the perception and experience of persistent physical symptoms are not well understood, and in the models, the specific relevance of peripheral input versus central processing, or of neurobiological versus psychosocial factors in general, is not clear. In this article, we proposed a model for this clinical phenomenon that is designed to be coherent with an underlying, relatively new model of the normal brain functions involved in the experience of bodily signals.METHODS: Based on a review of recent literature, we describe central elements of this model and its clinical implications.RESULTS: In the model, the brain is seen as an active predictive processing or inferential device rather than one that is passively waiting for sensory input. A central aspect of the model is the attempt of the brain to minimize prediction errors that result from constant comparisons of predictions and sensory input. Two possibilities exist: adaptation of the generative model underlying the predictions or alteration of the sensory input via autonomic nervous activation (in the case of interoception). Following this model, persistent physical symptoms can be described as "failures of inference" and clinically well-known factors such as expectation are assigned a role, not only in the later amplification of bodily signals but also in the very basis of symptom perception.CONCLUSIONS: We discuss therapeutic implications of such a model including new interpretations for established treatments as well as new options such as virtual reality techniques combining exteroceptive and interoceptive information.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms underlying the perception and experience of persistent physical symptoms are not well understood, and in the models, the specific relevance of peripheral input versus central processing, or of neurobiological versus psychosocial factors in general, is not clear. In this article, we proposed a model for this clinical phenomenon that is designed to be coherent with an underlying, relatively new model of the normal brain functions involved in the experience of bodily signals.METHODS: Based on a review of recent literature, we describe central elements of this model and its clinical implications.RESULTS: In the model, the brain is seen as an active predictive processing or inferential device rather than one that is passively waiting for sensory input. A central aspect of the model is the attempt of the brain to minimize prediction errors that result from constant comparisons of predictions and sensory input. Two possibilities exist: adaptation of the generative model underlying the predictions or alteration of the sensory input via autonomic nervous activation (in the case of interoception). Following this model, persistent physical symptoms can be described as "failures of inference" and clinically well-known factors such as expectation are assigned a role, not only in the later amplification of bodily signals but also in the very basis of symptom perception.CONCLUSIONS: We discuss therapeutic implications of such a model including new interpretations for established treatments as well as new options such as virtual reality techniques combining exteroceptive and interoceptive information.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000588

DO - 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000588

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 29621046

VL - 80

SP - 422

EP - 431

JO - PSYCHOSOM MED

JF - PSYCHOSOM MED

SN - 0033-3174

IS - 5

ER -