Perioperative Management in Patients With Undergoing Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Oral Surgery - A Multicentric Questionnaire Survey

Standard

Perioperative Management in Patients With Undergoing Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Oral Surgery - A Multicentric Questionnaire Survey. / Precht, Clarissa; Demirel, Yeliz; Assaf, Alexandre T; Pinnschmidt, Hans O; Knipfer, Christian; Hanken, Henning; Friedrich, Reinhard E; Wikner, Johannes.

in: IN VIVO, Jahrgang 33, Nr. 3, 28.04.2019, S. 855-862.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6395b4da9e144c4da75af7d0ce76357d,
title = "Perioperative Management in Patients With Undergoing Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Oral Surgery - A Multicentric Questionnaire Survey",
abstract = "AIM: The purpose of this study was to survey the current opinions of hospitals and medical practices concerning the perioperative management of patients undergoing direct oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC) and discuss recommendations for the clinical practice.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire with 13 topics and multiple ordinal-polytomous subitems was designed and sent to 120 Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Austria, Switzerland and Germany, as well as to 85 oral and maxillofacial/oral surgeons in medical offices in Hamburg, Germany. The data were statistically evaluated by Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests.RESULTS: The rate of response was 42%. Thirty-seven percent of respondents reported treating over 50 patients per year with undergoing DOAC therapy and only 18% assess a high bleeding risk [33% for vitamin K antagonists (VKA)]. In contrast to that, 62% of respondents would interrupt the DOAC therapy for extraction of one tooth, while 94% would continue VKA therapy. Significantly more clinicians apply suture than those in a medical office. The use of additional hemostatic measures varied between clinic and medical practice. There was a clear request for more detailed guidelines.CONCLUSION: The study shows the current opinion for perioperative management of patients undergoing DOAC therapy. Multi-centric studies under controlled conditions are needed for a safer treatment of anticoagulated patients as therapy strategies differ greatly between institutions and therefore a complication analysis is hardly possible.",
author = "Clarissa Precht and Yeliz Demirel and Assaf, {Alexandre T} and Pinnschmidt, {Hans O} and Christian Knipfer and Henning Hanken and Friedrich, {Reinhard E} and Johannes Wikner",
note = "Copyright{\textcopyright} 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "28",
doi = "10.21873/invivo.11550",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "855--862",
journal = "IN VIVO",
issn = "0258-851X",
publisher = "International Institute of Anticancer Research",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perioperative Management in Patients With Undergoing Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Oral Surgery - A Multicentric Questionnaire Survey

AU - Precht, Clarissa

AU - Demirel, Yeliz

AU - Assaf, Alexandre T

AU - Pinnschmidt, Hans O

AU - Knipfer, Christian

AU - Hanken, Henning

AU - Friedrich, Reinhard E

AU - Wikner, Johannes

N1 - Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/4/28

Y1 - 2019/4/28

N2 - AIM: The purpose of this study was to survey the current opinions of hospitals and medical practices concerning the perioperative management of patients undergoing direct oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC) and discuss recommendations for the clinical practice.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire with 13 topics and multiple ordinal-polytomous subitems was designed and sent to 120 Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Austria, Switzerland and Germany, as well as to 85 oral and maxillofacial/oral surgeons in medical offices in Hamburg, Germany. The data were statistically evaluated by Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests.RESULTS: The rate of response was 42%. Thirty-seven percent of respondents reported treating over 50 patients per year with undergoing DOAC therapy and only 18% assess a high bleeding risk [33% for vitamin K antagonists (VKA)]. In contrast to that, 62% of respondents would interrupt the DOAC therapy for extraction of one tooth, while 94% would continue VKA therapy. Significantly more clinicians apply suture than those in a medical office. The use of additional hemostatic measures varied between clinic and medical practice. There was a clear request for more detailed guidelines.CONCLUSION: The study shows the current opinion for perioperative management of patients undergoing DOAC therapy. Multi-centric studies under controlled conditions are needed for a safer treatment of anticoagulated patients as therapy strategies differ greatly between institutions and therefore a complication analysis is hardly possible.

AB - AIM: The purpose of this study was to survey the current opinions of hospitals and medical practices concerning the perioperative management of patients undergoing direct oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC) and discuss recommendations for the clinical practice.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire with 13 topics and multiple ordinal-polytomous subitems was designed and sent to 120 Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Austria, Switzerland and Germany, as well as to 85 oral and maxillofacial/oral surgeons in medical offices in Hamburg, Germany. The data were statistically evaluated by Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests.RESULTS: The rate of response was 42%. Thirty-seven percent of respondents reported treating over 50 patients per year with undergoing DOAC therapy and only 18% assess a high bleeding risk [33% for vitamin K antagonists (VKA)]. In contrast to that, 62% of respondents would interrupt the DOAC therapy for extraction of one tooth, while 94% would continue VKA therapy. Significantly more clinicians apply suture than those in a medical office. The use of additional hemostatic measures varied between clinic and medical practice. There was a clear request for more detailed guidelines.CONCLUSION: The study shows the current opinion for perioperative management of patients undergoing DOAC therapy. Multi-centric studies under controlled conditions are needed for a safer treatment of anticoagulated patients as therapy strategies differ greatly between institutions and therefore a complication analysis is hardly possible.

U2 - 10.21873/invivo.11550

DO - 10.21873/invivo.11550

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31028208

VL - 33

SP - 855

EP - 862

JO - IN VIVO

JF - IN VIVO

SN - 0258-851X

IS - 3

ER -