Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

Standard

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. / Schoch, Dominic; Sommer, Rachel; Augustin, Matthias; Ständer, Sonja; Blome, Christine.

in: J INVEST DERMATOL, Jahrgang 137, Nr. 10, 10.2017, S. 2069-2077.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{854c74dd976e48b7abba13afcf35e2a5,
title = "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties",
abstract = "This review aims to systematically evaluate studies on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures in pruritus, especially for use in clinical trials. Validation studies on instruments were identified based on a PubMed literature search. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments checklist was used to evaluate the studies' methodological quality, and the consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments criteria were used to synthesize the instruments' measurement properties. Twenty-three studies were included, which contain 37 examinations of reliability and/or validity for 23 different outcome measures. The methodological quality of reliability and validity evidence was moderate for six outcome measures; for these measures, psychometric property rating was adequate too, making them suitable for use in clinical trials. Itch severity scale, itchy quality of life, numerical rating scale-6, numerical rating scale-11, visual analog scale (horizontal), and verbal numerical rating scale-4 are currently the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measures with regard to overall reliability and validity.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review",
author = "Dominic Schoch and Rachel Sommer and Matthias Augustin and Sonja St{\"a}nder and Christine Blome",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.020",
language = "English",
volume = "137",
pages = "2069--2077",
journal = "J INVEST DERMATOL",
issn = "0022-202X",
publisher = "NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

AU - Schoch, Dominic

AU - Sommer, Rachel

AU - Augustin, Matthias

AU - Ständer, Sonja

AU - Blome, Christine

N1 - Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - This review aims to systematically evaluate studies on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures in pruritus, especially for use in clinical trials. Validation studies on instruments were identified based on a PubMed literature search. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments checklist was used to evaluate the studies' methodological quality, and the consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments criteria were used to synthesize the instruments' measurement properties. Twenty-three studies were included, which contain 37 examinations of reliability and/or validity for 23 different outcome measures. The methodological quality of reliability and validity evidence was moderate for six outcome measures; for these measures, psychometric property rating was adequate too, making them suitable for use in clinical trials. Itch severity scale, itchy quality of life, numerical rating scale-6, numerical rating scale-11, visual analog scale (horizontal), and verbal numerical rating scale-4 are currently the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measures with regard to overall reliability and validity.

AB - This review aims to systematically evaluate studies on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures in pruritus, especially for use in clinical trials. Validation studies on instruments were identified based on a PubMed literature search. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments checklist was used to evaluate the studies' methodological quality, and the consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments criteria were used to synthesize the instruments' measurement properties. Twenty-three studies were included, which contain 37 examinations of reliability and/or validity for 23 different outcome measures. The methodological quality of reliability and validity evidence was moderate for six outcome measures; for these measures, psychometric property rating was adequate too, making them suitable for use in clinical trials. Itch severity scale, itchy quality of life, numerical rating scale-6, numerical rating scale-11, visual analog scale (horizontal), and verbal numerical rating scale-4 are currently the most appropriate patient-reported outcome measures with regard to overall reliability and validity.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.020

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 28859861

VL - 137

SP - 2069

EP - 2077

JO - J INVEST DERMATOL

JF - J INVEST DERMATOL

SN - 0022-202X

IS - 10

ER -