Oxygen Treatment in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Standard

Oxygen Treatment in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. / Grensemann, Jörn; Fuhrmann, Valentin; Kluge, Stefan.

in: DTSCH ARZTEBL INT, Jahrgang 115, Nr. 27-28, 09.07.2018, S. 455-462.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{bf5aa0d95e1a460ea3f89db2978eae62,
title = "Oxygen Treatment in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Oxygen treatment is often life-saving, but multiple studies in recent years have yielded evidence that the indiscriminate administration of oxygen to patients in the intensive care unit and emergency room can cause hyperoxia and thereby elevate mortality.METHODS: This review is based on prospective, randomized trials concerning the optimum use of oxygen in adult medicine, which were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, as well as on pertinent retrospective studies and guideline recommendations.RESULTS: 13 prospective, randomized trials involving a total of 17 213 patients were analyzed. In patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in ventilated intensive-care patients, normoxia was associated with a lower mortality than hyperoxia (2% vs. 9%). In patients with myocardial infarction, restrictive oxygen administration was associated with a smaller infarct size on cardiac MRI at 6 months compared to oxygen administration at 8 L/min (13.1 g vs. 20.3 g). For patients with stroke, the currently available data do not reveal any benefit or harm from oxygen administration. None of the trials showed any benefit from the administration of oxygen to non-hypoxemic patients; in fact, this was generally associated with increased morbidity or mortality.CONCLUSION: Hypoxemia should certainly be avoided, but the fact that the liberal administration of oxygen to patients in intensive care units and emergency rooms tends to increase morbidity and mortality implies the advisability of a conservative, normoxic oxygenation strategy.",
author = "J{\"o}rn Grensemann and Valentin Fuhrmann and Stefan Kluge",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "9",
doi = "10.3238/arztebl.2018.0455",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "455--462",
journal = "DTSCH ARZTEBL INT",
issn = "1866-0452",
publisher = "Deutscher Arzte-Verlag",
number = "27-28",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oxygen Treatment in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

AU - Grensemann, Jörn

AU - Fuhrmann, Valentin

AU - Kluge, Stefan

PY - 2018/7/9

Y1 - 2018/7/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: Oxygen treatment is often life-saving, but multiple studies in recent years have yielded evidence that the indiscriminate administration of oxygen to patients in the intensive care unit and emergency room can cause hyperoxia and thereby elevate mortality.METHODS: This review is based on prospective, randomized trials concerning the optimum use of oxygen in adult medicine, which were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, as well as on pertinent retrospective studies and guideline recommendations.RESULTS: 13 prospective, randomized trials involving a total of 17 213 patients were analyzed. In patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in ventilated intensive-care patients, normoxia was associated with a lower mortality than hyperoxia (2% vs. 9%). In patients with myocardial infarction, restrictive oxygen administration was associated with a smaller infarct size on cardiac MRI at 6 months compared to oxygen administration at 8 L/min (13.1 g vs. 20.3 g). For patients with stroke, the currently available data do not reveal any benefit or harm from oxygen administration. None of the trials showed any benefit from the administration of oxygen to non-hypoxemic patients; in fact, this was generally associated with increased morbidity or mortality.CONCLUSION: Hypoxemia should certainly be avoided, but the fact that the liberal administration of oxygen to patients in intensive care units and emergency rooms tends to increase morbidity and mortality implies the advisability of a conservative, normoxic oxygenation strategy.

AB - BACKGROUND: Oxygen treatment is often life-saving, but multiple studies in recent years have yielded evidence that the indiscriminate administration of oxygen to patients in the intensive care unit and emergency room can cause hyperoxia and thereby elevate mortality.METHODS: This review is based on prospective, randomized trials concerning the optimum use of oxygen in adult medicine, which were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, as well as on pertinent retrospective studies and guideline recommendations.RESULTS: 13 prospective, randomized trials involving a total of 17 213 patients were analyzed. In patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in ventilated intensive-care patients, normoxia was associated with a lower mortality than hyperoxia (2% vs. 9%). In patients with myocardial infarction, restrictive oxygen administration was associated with a smaller infarct size on cardiac MRI at 6 months compared to oxygen administration at 8 L/min (13.1 g vs. 20.3 g). For patients with stroke, the currently available data do not reveal any benefit or harm from oxygen administration. None of the trials showed any benefit from the administration of oxygen to non-hypoxemic patients; in fact, this was generally associated with increased morbidity or mortality.CONCLUSION: Hypoxemia should certainly be avoided, but the fact that the liberal administration of oxygen to patients in intensive care units and emergency rooms tends to increase morbidity and mortality implies the advisability of a conservative, normoxic oxygenation strategy.

U2 - 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0455

DO - 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0455

M3 - SCORING: Review article

VL - 115

SP - 455

EP - 462

JO - DTSCH ARZTEBL INT

JF - DTSCH ARZTEBL INT

SN - 1866-0452

IS - 27-28

ER -