Overestimation of the Ischemic Core Is Associated With Higher Core Lesion Volume and Degree of Reperfusion After Thrombectomy

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overestimation of the Ischemic Core Is Associated With Higher Core Lesion Volume and Degree of Reperfusion After Thrombectomy

AU - Broocks, Gabriel

AU - Meyer, Lukas

AU - Winkelmeier, Laurens

AU - Kniep, Helge

AU - Heitkamp, Christian

AU - Christensen, Soren

AU - Lansberg, Maarten G

AU - Thaler, Christian

AU - Kemmling, Andre

AU - Schön, Gerhard

AU - Zeleňák, Kamil

AU - Stracke, Paul C

AU - Albers, Gregory

AU - Fiehler, Jens

AU - Wintermark, Max

AU - Heit, Jeremy J

AU - Faizy, Tobias D

PY - 2024/7

Y1 - 2024/7

N2 - Background CT perfusion (CTP)-derived baseline ischemic core volume (ICV) can overestimate the true extent of infarction, which may result in exclusion of patients with ischemic stroke from endovascular treatment (EVT). Purpose To determine whether ischemic core overestimation is associated with larger ICV and degree of recanalization. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with acute ischemic stroke triaged at multimodal CT who underwent EVT between January 2015 and January 2022. The primary outcome was ischemic core overestimation, which was assumed when baseline CTP-derived ICV was larger than the final infarct volume at follow-up imaging. The secondary outcome was functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 90 days after EVT. Successful vessel recanalization was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or higher. Categorical variables were compared between patients with ICV of 50 mL or less versus large ICV greater than 50 mL with use of the χ2 test. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Results In total, 721 patients (median age, 76 years [IQR, 64-83 years]; 371 female) were included, of which 162 (22%) demonstrated ischemic core overestimation. Core overestimation occurred more often in patients with ICV greater than 50 mL versus 50 mL or less (48% vs 16%; P < .001) and those with successful versus unsuccessful vessel recanalization (26% vs 13%; P < .001). In an adjusted model, successful recanalization after EVT (odds ratio [OR], 3.14 [95% CI: 1.65, 5.95]; P < .001) and larger ICV (OR, 1.03 [95% CI: 1.02, 1.04]; P < .001) were independently associated with core overestimation, while the time from symptom onset to imaging showed no association (OR, 0.99; P = .96). Core overestimation was independently associated with functional independence (adjusted OR, 2.83 [95% CI: 1.66, 4.81]; P < .001) after successful recanalization. Conclusion Ischemic core overestimation occurred more frequently in patients presenting with large CTP-derived ICV and successful vessel recanalization compared with those with unsuccessful recanalization. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

AB - Background CT perfusion (CTP)-derived baseline ischemic core volume (ICV) can overestimate the true extent of infarction, which may result in exclusion of patients with ischemic stroke from endovascular treatment (EVT). Purpose To determine whether ischemic core overestimation is associated with larger ICV and degree of recanalization. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with acute ischemic stroke triaged at multimodal CT who underwent EVT between January 2015 and January 2022. The primary outcome was ischemic core overestimation, which was assumed when baseline CTP-derived ICV was larger than the final infarct volume at follow-up imaging. The secondary outcome was functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 90 days after EVT. Successful vessel recanalization was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or higher. Categorical variables were compared between patients with ICV of 50 mL or less versus large ICV greater than 50 mL with use of the χ2 test. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Results In total, 721 patients (median age, 76 years [IQR, 64-83 years]; 371 female) were included, of which 162 (22%) demonstrated ischemic core overestimation. Core overestimation occurred more often in patients with ICV greater than 50 mL versus 50 mL or less (48% vs 16%; P < .001) and those with successful versus unsuccessful vessel recanalization (26% vs 13%; P < .001). In an adjusted model, successful recanalization after EVT (odds ratio [OR], 3.14 [95% CI: 1.65, 5.95]; P < .001) and larger ICV (OR, 1.03 [95% CI: 1.02, 1.04]; P < .001) were independently associated with core overestimation, while the time from symptom onset to imaging showed no association (OR, 0.99; P = .96). Core overestimation was independently associated with functional independence (adjusted OR, 2.83 [95% CI: 1.66, 4.81]; P < .001) after successful recanalization. Conclusion Ischemic core overestimation occurred more frequently in patients presenting with large CTP-derived ICV and successful vessel recanalization compared with those with unsuccessful recanalization. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

KW - Humans

KW - Female

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Thrombectomy/methods

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Ischemic Stroke/diagnostic imaging

KW - Reperfusion/methods

KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.231750

DO - 10.1148/radiol.231750

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 39078297

VL - 312

SP - e231750

JO - RADIOLOGY

JF - RADIOLOGY

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -