Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with denosumab: A multicenter case series
Standard
Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with denosumab: A multicenter case series. / Aljohani, Suad; Gaudin, Robert; Weiser, Julian; Tröltzsch, Matthias; Ehrenfeld, Michael; Kaeppler, Gabriele; Smeets, Ralf; Otto, Sven.
in: J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, Jahrgang 46, Nr. 9, 09.2018, S. 1515-1525.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with denosumab: A multicenter case series
AU - Aljohani, Suad
AU - Gaudin, Robert
AU - Weiser, Julian
AU - Tröltzsch, Matthias
AU - Ehrenfeld, Michael
AU - Kaeppler, Gabriele
AU - Smeets, Ralf
AU - Otto, Sven
N1 - Copyright © 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - PURPOSE: Osteonecrosis of the jaw has been recently reported in patients receiving denosumab for the treatment of metastatic bone disease and osteoporosis. It is essential to investigate this disease as a new osteonecrosis entity in order to recognize its optimal management strategies.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 63 cases of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (DRONJ) diagnosed at two clinical centres were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, antiresorptive medication use, local preceding event, location, DRONJ stage, treatment and treatment outcomes were analyzed.RESULTS: In all, 69 MRONJ lesions in 63 patients were diagnosed. The mean patient age was 70 ± 9 years. Denosumab was the only received antiresorptive medication in 50.8% of the patients. Discontinuation of denosumab prior to treatment was recorded for 66.7% of the patients, with a mean period of 6 ± 3.4 months. Stage 2 was the most common stage of the disease (71%). The lesions were predominantly located in the mandible (63.5%). The most common preceding local event was extraction (55.6%). Surgical treatment was performed in 95.7% of the cases, while purely conservative treatment was performed in 4.3%. DRONJ healed after surgical treatment in 71.7% of the treated lesions. Complete mucosal healing was achieved in 77.2% of the lesions treated with fluorescence-guided surgery (17/22). Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were not significantly different between patients with and without previous intake of bisphosphonates.CONCLUSION: DRONJ is more prevalent at extraction and local infection sites in cancer patients. Within the limitation of this study, surgical treatment, particularly fluorescence-guided surgery, appears to be effective for the management of DRONJ. The prior use of bisphosphonates does not seem to affect severity nor the treatment success rate of DRONJ.
AB - PURPOSE: Osteonecrosis of the jaw has been recently reported in patients receiving denosumab for the treatment of metastatic bone disease and osteoporosis. It is essential to investigate this disease as a new osteonecrosis entity in order to recognize its optimal management strategies.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 63 cases of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (DRONJ) diagnosed at two clinical centres were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, antiresorptive medication use, local preceding event, location, DRONJ stage, treatment and treatment outcomes were analyzed.RESULTS: In all, 69 MRONJ lesions in 63 patients were diagnosed. The mean patient age was 70 ± 9 years. Denosumab was the only received antiresorptive medication in 50.8% of the patients. Discontinuation of denosumab prior to treatment was recorded for 66.7% of the patients, with a mean period of 6 ± 3.4 months. Stage 2 was the most common stage of the disease (71%). The lesions were predominantly located in the mandible (63.5%). The most common preceding local event was extraction (55.6%). Surgical treatment was performed in 95.7% of the cases, while purely conservative treatment was performed in 4.3%. DRONJ healed after surgical treatment in 71.7% of the treated lesions. Complete mucosal healing was achieved in 77.2% of the lesions treated with fluorescence-guided surgery (17/22). Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were not significantly different between patients with and without previous intake of bisphosphonates.CONCLUSION: DRONJ is more prevalent at extraction and local infection sites in cancer patients. Within the limitation of this study, surgical treatment, particularly fluorescence-guided surgery, appears to be effective for the management of DRONJ. The prior use of bisphosphonates does not seem to affect severity nor the treatment success rate of DRONJ.
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
KW - Bone Density Conservation Agents
KW - Comorbidity
KW - Denosumab
KW - Female
KW - Germany
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Neoplasms
KW - Prevalence
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Journal Article
KW - Multicenter Study
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.046
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.046
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 29983309
VL - 46
SP - 1515
EP - 1525
JO - J CRANIO MAXILL SURG
JF - J CRANIO MAXILL SURG
SN - 1010-5182
IS - 9
ER -