Oral health and access to dental care - a comparison of elderly migrants and non-migrants in Germany

Standard

Oral health and access to dental care - a comparison of elderly migrants and non-migrants in Germany. / Aarabi, Ghazal; Reissmann, Daniel R; Seedorf, Udo; Becher, Heiko; Heydecke, Guido; Kofahl, Christopher.

in: ETHNIC HEALTH, Jahrgang 23, Nr. 7, 10.2018, S. 703-717.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5c06c2cd293a4e96bea0c8fa40ac5c7f,
title = "Oral health and access to dental care - a comparison of elderly migrants and non-migrants in Germany",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To compare oral health, access barriers to dental care, oral health behavior and oral hygiene behavior of elderly German residents with and without immigration background.DESIGN: In this cross-sectional explorative study, a convenience sample (N = 112, age ≥ 60 years, 54% immigrants) was recruited in four dental practices in Hamburg, Germany. Oral health was assessed with Decayed/Missing/Filled Teeth (DMFT), Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI), and Approximal Plaque Index (API). Dental health was operationalized as number of decayed teeth, and poor oral hygiene based on a PBI ≥ 40%. Access barriers and oral health behavior were assessed with a standardized questionnaire.RESULTS: While caries experience was similar in migrants and non-migrants (DMFT mean: 24.8 vs. 23.4, n.s.), significantly more teeth were decayed (5.3 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), and API (55.3% vs. 33.0%, p = 0.002) and PBI (46.3% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.016) were significantly higher in migrants. After adjusting for age, sex, income, education, and number of teeth, migrants still had on average 3 decayed teeth more than non-migrants. However, impact of migration background on poor oral health changed from OR = 3.61 (p = 0.007) to OR = 1.05 (n.s.) after adjusting for confounders, mainly due to lower income in migrants. Fewer migrants had visited a dentist within the past 12 months, and migrants were less likely to have a regular dentist that they visit and more often indicated language or cost barriers than non-migrants.CONCLUSION: Elderly German migrants have higher treatment needs than non-migrants. Likely causes are poorer oral hygiene and lower utilization of dental care services. Specific prevention programs targeting migrants are warranted to improve oral health in this disadvantaged group.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Ghazal Aarabi and Reissmann, {Daniel R} and Udo Seedorf and Heiko Becher and Guido Heydecke and Christopher Kofahl",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1080/13557858.2017.1294658",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "703--717",
journal = "ETHNIC HEALTH",
issn = "1355-7858",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oral health and access to dental care - a comparison of elderly migrants and non-migrants in Germany

AU - Aarabi, Ghazal

AU - Reissmann, Daniel R

AU - Seedorf, Udo

AU - Becher, Heiko

AU - Heydecke, Guido

AU - Kofahl, Christopher

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To compare oral health, access barriers to dental care, oral health behavior and oral hygiene behavior of elderly German residents with and without immigration background.DESIGN: In this cross-sectional explorative study, a convenience sample (N = 112, age ≥ 60 years, 54% immigrants) was recruited in four dental practices in Hamburg, Germany. Oral health was assessed with Decayed/Missing/Filled Teeth (DMFT), Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI), and Approximal Plaque Index (API). Dental health was operationalized as number of decayed teeth, and poor oral hygiene based on a PBI ≥ 40%. Access barriers and oral health behavior were assessed with a standardized questionnaire.RESULTS: While caries experience was similar in migrants and non-migrants (DMFT mean: 24.8 vs. 23.4, n.s.), significantly more teeth were decayed (5.3 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), and API (55.3% vs. 33.0%, p = 0.002) and PBI (46.3% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.016) were significantly higher in migrants. After adjusting for age, sex, income, education, and number of teeth, migrants still had on average 3 decayed teeth more than non-migrants. However, impact of migration background on poor oral health changed from OR = 3.61 (p = 0.007) to OR = 1.05 (n.s.) after adjusting for confounders, mainly due to lower income in migrants. Fewer migrants had visited a dentist within the past 12 months, and migrants were less likely to have a regular dentist that they visit and more often indicated language or cost barriers than non-migrants.CONCLUSION: Elderly German migrants have higher treatment needs than non-migrants. Likely causes are poorer oral hygiene and lower utilization of dental care services. Specific prevention programs targeting migrants are warranted to improve oral health in this disadvantaged group.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To compare oral health, access barriers to dental care, oral health behavior and oral hygiene behavior of elderly German residents with and without immigration background.DESIGN: In this cross-sectional explorative study, a convenience sample (N = 112, age ≥ 60 years, 54% immigrants) was recruited in four dental practices in Hamburg, Germany. Oral health was assessed with Decayed/Missing/Filled Teeth (DMFT), Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI), and Approximal Plaque Index (API). Dental health was operationalized as number of decayed teeth, and poor oral hygiene based on a PBI ≥ 40%. Access barriers and oral health behavior were assessed with a standardized questionnaire.RESULTS: While caries experience was similar in migrants and non-migrants (DMFT mean: 24.8 vs. 23.4, n.s.), significantly more teeth were decayed (5.3 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), and API (55.3% vs. 33.0%, p = 0.002) and PBI (46.3% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.016) were significantly higher in migrants. After adjusting for age, sex, income, education, and number of teeth, migrants still had on average 3 decayed teeth more than non-migrants. However, impact of migration background on poor oral health changed from OR = 3.61 (p = 0.007) to OR = 1.05 (n.s.) after adjusting for confounders, mainly due to lower income in migrants. Fewer migrants had visited a dentist within the past 12 months, and migrants were less likely to have a regular dentist that they visit and more often indicated language or cost barriers than non-migrants.CONCLUSION: Elderly German migrants have higher treatment needs than non-migrants. Likely causes are poorer oral hygiene and lower utilization of dental care services. Specific prevention programs targeting migrants are warranted to improve oral health in this disadvantaged group.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1080/13557858.2017.1294658

DO - 10.1080/13557858.2017.1294658

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28277023

VL - 23

SP - 703

EP - 717

JO - ETHNIC HEALTH

JF - ETHNIC HEALTH

SN - 1355-7858

IS - 7

ER -