Optimizing the montage for cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): a combined computational and experimental study
Standard
Optimizing the montage for cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): a combined computational and experimental study. / Sadeghihassanabadi, Fatemeh; Misselhorn, Jonas; Gerloff, Christian; Zittel, Simone.
in: J NEURAL ENG, Jahrgang 19, Nr. 2, 026060, 04.05.2022.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing the montage for cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): a combined computational and experimental study
AU - Sadeghihassanabadi, Fatemeh
AU - Misselhorn, Jonas
AU - Gerloff, Christian
AU - Zittel, Simone
N1 - Creative Commons Attribution license.
PY - 2022/5/4
Y1 - 2022/5/4
N2 - Objective. The application of cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is limited by the absence of commonly agreed montages and also the presence of unpleasant side effects. We aimed to find the most effective cerebellar tACS montage with minimum side effects (skin sensations and phosphenes).Approach. We first simulated cerebellar tACS with five montages (return electrode on forehead, buccinator, jaw, and neck positions, additionally focal montage with high-definition ring electrodes) to compare induced cerebellar current, then stimulated healthy participants and evaluated side effects for different montages and varying stimulation frequencies.Main results. The simulation revealed a descending order of current density in the cerebellum from forehead to buccinator, jaw, neck and ring montage respectively. Montages inducing higher current intensity in the eyeballs during the simulation resulted in stronger and broader phosphenes during tACS sessions. Strong co-stimulation of the brainstem was observed for the neck. Skin sensations did not differ between montages or frequencies. We propose the jaw montage as an optimal choice for maximizing cerebellar stimulation while minimizing unwanted side effects.Significance. These findings contribute to adopting a standard cerebellar tACS protocol. The combination of computational modelling and experimental data offers improved experimental control, safety, effectiveness, and reproducibility to all brain stimulation practices.
AB - Objective. The application of cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is limited by the absence of commonly agreed montages and also the presence of unpleasant side effects. We aimed to find the most effective cerebellar tACS montage with minimum side effects (skin sensations and phosphenes).Approach. We first simulated cerebellar tACS with five montages (return electrode on forehead, buccinator, jaw, and neck positions, additionally focal montage with high-definition ring electrodes) to compare induced cerebellar current, then stimulated healthy participants and evaluated side effects for different montages and varying stimulation frequencies.Main results. The simulation revealed a descending order of current density in the cerebellum from forehead to buccinator, jaw, neck and ring montage respectively. Montages inducing higher current intensity in the eyeballs during the simulation resulted in stronger and broader phosphenes during tACS sessions. Strong co-stimulation of the brainstem was observed for the neck. Skin sensations did not differ between montages or frequencies. We propose the jaw montage as an optimal choice for maximizing cerebellar stimulation while minimizing unwanted side effects.Significance. These findings contribute to adopting a standard cerebellar tACS protocol. The combination of computational modelling and experimental data offers improved experimental control, safety, effectiveness, and reproducibility to all brain stimulation practices.
KW - Cerebellum
KW - Humans
KW - Phosphenes
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Sensation/physiology
KW - Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods
U2 - 10.1088/1741-2552/ac676f
DO - 10.1088/1741-2552/ac676f
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 35421852
VL - 19
JO - J NEURAL ENG
JF - J NEURAL ENG
SN - 1741-2560
IS - 2
M1 - 026060
ER -