Operative Versus Conservative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Standard

Operative Versus Conservative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture. / Krause, Matthias; Freudenthaler, Fabian; Frosch, Karl-Heinz; Achtnich, Andrea; Petersen, Wolf; Akoto, Ralph.

in: DTSCH ARZTEBL INT, Jahrgang 115, Nr. 51-52, 24.12.2018, S. 855-862.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{934d0fbf09ca4bc2a8bc2fd3bf3fdd3e,
title = "Operative Versus Conservative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a serious injury in patients who are typically young and athletically active, with potential long-term complica- tions including functional limitation, posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is now considered the gold standard of treatment for regaining stability and improving knee function. Conservative treatment is an alternative.METHODS: To compare operative and conservative treatment, we reviewed pertinent publications retrieved by a systematic search in Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases. PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42017060462 on 31 March 2017.RESULTS: 13 publications concerning a total of 1246 patients were included in the analysis; only two were reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In one of the RCTs, ACL reconstruction was found to yield better functional outcomes than con- servative management. The other RCT did not reveal any harm from initial conser- vative management, although the conservative-to-operative crossover rate in this trial was 51%. The functional outcomes were heterogeneous. In six observational studies, knee function was significantly better after surgery; in seven others, it was not. Five out of nine analyses in which knee-joint stability was restored after surgery showed superior functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction compared to conser- vative management. Three studies in which no satisfactory postoperative knee-joint stability was found did not show any functional difference between surgery and conservative management.CONCLUSION: On the basis of RCTs published to date, it cannot be definitively con- cluded whether surgery or conservative (expectant) management of ACL rupture yields a better functional outcome. There is a trend in observational studies toward better functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. As an average across studies, conservative treatment fails in 17.5% (± 15.5%) of patients.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Matthias Krause and Fabian Freudenthaler and Karl-Heinz Frosch and Andrea Achtnich and Wolf Petersen and Ralph Akoto",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "24",
doi = "10.3238/arztebl.2018.0855",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "855--862",
journal = "DTSCH ARZTEBL INT",
issn = "1866-0452",
publisher = "Deutscher Arzte-Verlag",
number = "51-52",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operative Versus Conservative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

AU - Krause, Matthias

AU - Freudenthaler, Fabian

AU - Frosch, Karl-Heinz

AU - Achtnich, Andrea

AU - Petersen, Wolf

AU - Akoto, Ralph

PY - 2018/12/24

Y1 - 2018/12/24

N2 - BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a serious injury in patients who are typically young and athletically active, with potential long-term complica- tions including functional limitation, posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is now considered the gold standard of treatment for regaining stability and improving knee function. Conservative treatment is an alternative.METHODS: To compare operative and conservative treatment, we reviewed pertinent publications retrieved by a systematic search in Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases. PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42017060462 on 31 March 2017.RESULTS: 13 publications concerning a total of 1246 patients were included in the analysis; only two were reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In one of the RCTs, ACL reconstruction was found to yield better functional outcomes than con- servative management. The other RCT did not reveal any harm from initial conser- vative management, although the conservative-to-operative crossover rate in this trial was 51%. The functional outcomes were heterogeneous. In six observational studies, knee function was significantly better after surgery; in seven others, it was not. Five out of nine analyses in which knee-joint stability was restored after surgery showed superior functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction compared to conser- vative management. Three studies in which no satisfactory postoperative knee-joint stability was found did not show any functional difference between surgery and conservative management.CONCLUSION: On the basis of RCTs published to date, it cannot be definitively con- cluded whether surgery or conservative (expectant) management of ACL rupture yields a better functional outcome. There is a trend in observational studies toward better functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. As an average across studies, conservative treatment fails in 17.5% (± 15.5%) of patients.

AB - BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a serious injury in patients who are typically young and athletically active, with potential long-term complica- tions including functional limitation, posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee, and impaired quality of life. ACL reconstruction is now considered the gold standard of treatment for regaining stability and improving knee function. Conservative treatment is an alternative.METHODS: To compare operative and conservative treatment, we reviewed pertinent publications retrieved by a systematic search in Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases. PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42017060462 on 31 March 2017.RESULTS: 13 publications concerning a total of 1246 patients were included in the analysis; only two were reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In one of the RCTs, ACL reconstruction was found to yield better functional outcomes than con- servative management. The other RCT did not reveal any harm from initial conser- vative management, although the conservative-to-operative crossover rate in this trial was 51%. The functional outcomes were heterogeneous. In six observational studies, knee function was significantly better after surgery; in seven others, it was not. Five out of nine analyses in which knee-joint stability was restored after surgery showed superior functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction compared to conser- vative management. Three studies in which no satisfactory postoperative knee-joint stability was found did not show any functional difference between surgery and conservative management.CONCLUSION: On the basis of RCTs published to date, it cannot be definitively con- cluded whether surgery or conservative (expectant) management of ACL rupture yields a better functional outcome. There is a trend in observational studies toward better functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. As an average across studies, conservative treatment fails in 17.5% (± 15.5%) of patients.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0855

DO - 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0855

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30765021

VL - 115

SP - 855

EP - 862

JO - DTSCH ARZTEBL INT

JF - DTSCH ARZTEBL INT

SN - 1866-0452

IS - 51-52

ER -