Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review

Standard

Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. / Laukhtina, Ekaterina; Sari Motlagh, Reza; Mori, Keiichiro; Quhal, Fahad; Schuettfort, Victor M; Mostafaei, Hadi; Katayama, Satoshi; Grossmann, Nico C; Ploussard, Guillaume; Karakiewicz, Pierre I; Briganti, Alberto; Abufaraj, Mohammad; Enikeev, Dmitry; Pradere, Benjamin; Shariat, Shahrokh F.

in: WORLD J UROL, Jahrgang 39, Nr. 11, 11.2021, S. 4085-4099.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

Laukhtina, E, Sari Motlagh, R, Mori, K, Quhal, F, Schuettfort, VM, Mostafaei, H, Katayama, S, Grossmann, NC, Ploussard, G, Karakiewicz, PI, Briganti, A, Abufaraj, M, Enikeev, D, Pradere, B & Shariat, SF 2021, 'Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review', WORLD J UROL, Jg. 39, Nr. 11, S. 4085-4099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03703-8

APA

Laukhtina, E., Sari Motlagh, R., Mori, K., Quhal, F., Schuettfort, V. M., Mostafaei, H., Katayama, S., Grossmann, N. C., Ploussard, G., Karakiewicz, P. I., Briganti, A., Abufaraj, M., Enikeev, D., Pradere, B., & Shariat, S. F. (2021). Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. WORLD J UROL, 39(11), 4085-4099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03703-8

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{afabf43d48fa47a0a79a9b3993522ea8,
title = "Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To summarize the available evidence on the survival and pathologic outcomes after deferred radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).METHODS: The PubMed database and Web of Science were searched in November 2020 according to the PRISMA statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they reported the survival and pathologic outcomes of patients treated with deferred RP for intermediate- and high-risk PCa compared to the control group including those patients treated with RP without delay.RESULTS: Overall, nineteen studies met our eligibility criteria. We found a significant heterogeneity across the studies in terms of definitions for delay and outcomes, as well as in patients' baseline clinicopathologic features. According to the currently available literature, deferred RP does not seem to affect oncological survival outcomes, such as prostate cancer-specific mortality and metastasis-free survival, in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PCa. However, the impact of deferred RP on biochemical recurrence rates remains controversial. There is no clear association of deferring RP with any of the features of aggressive disease such as pathologic upgrading, upstaging, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node invasion. Deferred RP was not associated with the need for secondary treatments.CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the different definitions of a delayed RP, it is hard to make a consensus regarding the safe delay time. However, the current data suggest that deferring RP in patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa for at least around 3 months is generally safe, as it does not lead to adverse pathologic outcomes, biochemical recurrence, the need for secondary therapy, or worse oncological survival outcomes.",
keywords = "Humans, Male, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality, Survival Rate, Time-to-Treatment, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Ekaterina Laukhtina and {Sari Motlagh}, Reza and Keiichiro Mori and Fahad Quhal and Schuettfort, {Victor M} and Hadi Mostafaei and Satoshi Katayama and Grossmann, {Nico C} and Guillaume Ploussard and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I} and Alberto Briganti and Mohammad Abufaraj and Dmitry Enikeev and Benjamin Pradere and Shariat, {Shahrokh F}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021. The Author(s).",
year = "2021",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s00345-021-03703-8",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "4085--4099",
journal = "WORLD J UROL",
issn = "0724-4983",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review

AU - Laukhtina, Ekaterina

AU - Sari Motlagh, Reza

AU - Mori, Keiichiro

AU - Quhal, Fahad

AU - Schuettfort, Victor M

AU - Mostafaei, Hadi

AU - Katayama, Satoshi

AU - Grossmann, Nico C

AU - Ploussard, Guillaume

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

AU - Briganti, Alberto

AU - Abufaraj, Mohammad

AU - Enikeev, Dmitry

AU - Pradere, Benjamin

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F

N1 - © 2021. The Author(s).

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - PURPOSE: To summarize the available evidence on the survival and pathologic outcomes after deferred radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).METHODS: The PubMed database and Web of Science were searched in November 2020 according to the PRISMA statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they reported the survival and pathologic outcomes of patients treated with deferred RP for intermediate- and high-risk PCa compared to the control group including those patients treated with RP without delay.RESULTS: Overall, nineteen studies met our eligibility criteria. We found a significant heterogeneity across the studies in terms of definitions for delay and outcomes, as well as in patients' baseline clinicopathologic features. According to the currently available literature, deferred RP does not seem to affect oncological survival outcomes, such as prostate cancer-specific mortality and metastasis-free survival, in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PCa. However, the impact of deferred RP on biochemical recurrence rates remains controversial. There is no clear association of deferring RP with any of the features of aggressive disease such as pathologic upgrading, upstaging, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node invasion. Deferred RP was not associated with the need for secondary treatments.CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the different definitions of a delayed RP, it is hard to make a consensus regarding the safe delay time. However, the current data suggest that deferring RP in patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa for at least around 3 months is generally safe, as it does not lead to adverse pathologic outcomes, biochemical recurrence, the need for secondary therapy, or worse oncological survival outcomes.

AB - PURPOSE: To summarize the available evidence on the survival and pathologic outcomes after deferred radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).METHODS: The PubMed database and Web of Science were searched in November 2020 according to the PRISMA statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they reported the survival and pathologic outcomes of patients treated with deferred RP for intermediate- and high-risk PCa compared to the control group including those patients treated with RP without delay.RESULTS: Overall, nineteen studies met our eligibility criteria. We found a significant heterogeneity across the studies in terms of definitions for delay and outcomes, as well as in patients' baseline clinicopathologic features. According to the currently available literature, deferred RP does not seem to affect oncological survival outcomes, such as prostate cancer-specific mortality and metastasis-free survival, in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PCa. However, the impact of deferred RP on biochemical recurrence rates remains controversial. There is no clear association of deferring RP with any of the features of aggressive disease such as pathologic upgrading, upstaging, positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node invasion. Deferred RP was not associated with the need for secondary treatments.CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the different definitions of a delayed RP, it is hard to make a consensus regarding the safe delay time. However, the current data suggest that deferring RP in patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa for at least around 3 months is generally safe, as it does not lead to adverse pathologic outcomes, biochemical recurrence, the need for secondary therapy, or worse oncological survival outcomes.

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Prostatectomy

KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality

KW - Survival Rate

KW - Time-to-Treatment

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1007/s00345-021-03703-8

DO - 10.1007/s00345-021-03703-8

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 34047825

VL - 39

SP - 4085

EP - 4099

JO - WORLD J UROL

JF - WORLD J UROL

SN - 0724-4983

IS - 11

ER -