Non-concealed placebo treatment for menopausal hot flushes: Study protocol of a randomized-controlled trial

Standard

Non-concealed placebo treatment for menopausal hot flushes: Study protocol of a randomized-controlled trial. / Pan, Yiqi; Meister, Ramona; Löwe, Bernd; Winkelmann, Anne; Kaptchuk, Ted J; Bühling, Kai J.; Nestoriuc, Yvonne.

in: TRIALS, Jahrgang 20, Nr. 1, 508, 16.08.2019, S. 508.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c92e53dcd0494607babef0b979d93f95,
title = "Non-concealed placebo treatment for menopausal hot flushes: Study protocol of a randomized-controlled trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of placebos are high in double-blind hot flush trials. Studies in various conditions suggest that honestly prescribed placebos may elicit symptom improvement.OBJECTIVE: To determine whether open label placebo (OLP) treatment is efficacious in alleviating hot flushes among peri- and postmenopausal women.METHODS/DESIGN: In this assessor-blinded, randomized-controlled trial, n = 100 women experiencing five or more daily hot flushes of at least moderate severity and bothersomeness are assigned 1:1 to a 4-week OLP treatment or no treatment. To explore the duration and maintenance of placebo effects, the OLP group is randomized a second time to either discontinue or continue the OLP treatment for another 4 weeks. All participants receive a briefing about placebo effects and study visits at baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks), and follow-up (8 weeks, OLP group only). Qualitative interviews about subjective experiences with the OLP treatment are conducted. Primary outcomes are differences between the OLP and the no-treatment group in the hot flush composite score (frequency × severity), and bothersomeness of hot flushes as assessed with the Hot Flush Rating Scale at post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include hot flush frequency, health-related quality of life, global improvement, and the number of responders at post-treatment. Data are analyzed by fitting (generalized) linear mixed models. An exploratory analysis of maintenance and duration is performed including follow-up data.DISCUSSION: This trial will contribute to the evaluation of OLP treatments in clinical practice and further our understanding about the magnitude of placebo effects in hot flush treatments.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03838523 . Retrospectively registered on February 12th, 2019. The first patient was enrolled on October 10th, 2018.",
author = "Yiqi Pan and Ramona Meister and Bernd L{\"o}we and Anne Winkelmann and Kaptchuk, {Ted J} and B{\"u}hling, {Kai J.} and Yvonne Nestoriuc",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1186/s13063-019-3575-1",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "508",
journal = "TRIALS",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "Current Controlled Trials Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-concealed placebo treatment for menopausal hot flushes: Study protocol of a randomized-controlled trial

AU - Pan, Yiqi

AU - Meister, Ramona

AU - Löwe, Bernd

AU - Winkelmann, Anne

AU - Kaptchuk, Ted J

AU - Bühling, Kai J.

AU - Nestoriuc, Yvonne

PY - 2019/8/16

Y1 - 2019/8/16

N2 - BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of placebos are high in double-blind hot flush trials. Studies in various conditions suggest that honestly prescribed placebos may elicit symptom improvement.OBJECTIVE: To determine whether open label placebo (OLP) treatment is efficacious in alleviating hot flushes among peri- and postmenopausal women.METHODS/DESIGN: In this assessor-blinded, randomized-controlled trial, n = 100 women experiencing five or more daily hot flushes of at least moderate severity and bothersomeness are assigned 1:1 to a 4-week OLP treatment or no treatment. To explore the duration and maintenance of placebo effects, the OLP group is randomized a second time to either discontinue or continue the OLP treatment for another 4 weeks. All participants receive a briefing about placebo effects and study visits at baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks), and follow-up (8 weeks, OLP group only). Qualitative interviews about subjective experiences with the OLP treatment are conducted. Primary outcomes are differences between the OLP and the no-treatment group in the hot flush composite score (frequency × severity), and bothersomeness of hot flushes as assessed with the Hot Flush Rating Scale at post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include hot flush frequency, health-related quality of life, global improvement, and the number of responders at post-treatment. Data are analyzed by fitting (generalized) linear mixed models. An exploratory analysis of maintenance and duration is performed including follow-up data.DISCUSSION: This trial will contribute to the evaluation of OLP treatments in clinical practice and further our understanding about the magnitude of placebo effects in hot flush treatments.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03838523 . Retrospectively registered on February 12th, 2019. The first patient was enrolled on October 10th, 2018.

AB - BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of placebos are high in double-blind hot flush trials. Studies in various conditions suggest that honestly prescribed placebos may elicit symptom improvement.OBJECTIVE: To determine whether open label placebo (OLP) treatment is efficacious in alleviating hot flushes among peri- and postmenopausal women.METHODS/DESIGN: In this assessor-blinded, randomized-controlled trial, n = 100 women experiencing five or more daily hot flushes of at least moderate severity and bothersomeness are assigned 1:1 to a 4-week OLP treatment or no treatment. To explore the duration and maintenance of placebo effects, the OLP group is randomized a second time to either discontinue or continue the OLP treatment for another 4 weeks. All participants receive a briefing about placebo effects and study visits at baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks), and follow-up (8 weeks, OLP group only). Qualitative interviews about subjective experiences with the OLP treatment are conducted. Primary outcomes are differences between the OLP and the no-treatment group in the hot flush composite score (frequency × severity), and bothersomeness of hot flushes as assessed with the Hot Flush Rating Scale at post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include hot flush frequency, health-related quality of life, global improvement, and the number of responders at post-treatment. Data are analyzed by fitting (generalized) linear mixed models. An exploratory analysis of maintenance and duration is performed including follow-up data.DISCUSSION: This trial will contribute to the evaluation of OLP treatments in clinical practice and further our understanding about the magnitude of placebo effects in hot flush treatments.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03838523 . Retrospectively registered on February 12th, 2019. The first patient was enrolled on October 10th, 2018.

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-019-3575-1

DO - 10.1186/s13063-019-3575-1

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 508

JO - TRIALS

JF - TRIALS

SN - 1745-6215

IS - 1

M1 - 508

ER -