No significant retest effects in oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile.
Standard
No significant retest effects in oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile. / John, Mike T; Reißmann, Daniel; Schierz, Oliver; Allen, Finbarr.
in: ACTA ODONTOL SCAND, Jahrgang 66, Nr. 3, 3, 2008, S. 135-138.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - No significant retest effects in oral health-related quality of life assessment using the Oral Health Impact Profile.
AU - John, Mike T
AU - Reißmann, Daniel
AU - Schierz, Oliver
AU - Allen, Finbarr
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate retest effects in assessment of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) in patients requiring prosthodontic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The German 49-item OHIP was administered in 21 patients requiring prosthodontic treatment on three pretreatment occasions: twice (t(1) and t(2)) on day 1, 1-2 h apart, and on day 2 (t(3)), 3-78 days later. Differences in reliability coefficients, OHIP summary scores, and item responses, and the influence of time on score differences were analyzed. RESULTS: Some evidence of retest effects in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was found (the difference in reliability coefficients between t(1)-t(2) and t(2)-t(3) was 0.08; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support repeated OHRQoL assessment over short periods of time when perceived oral health is rapidly changing. This is important because many oral conditions have acute symptoms and treatments have immediate OHRQoL effects that need to be measured.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate retest effects in assessment of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) in patients requiring prosthodontic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The German 49-item OHIP was administered in 21 patients requiring prosthodontic treatment on three pretreatment occasions: twice (t(1) and t(2)) on day 1, 1-2 h apart, and on day 2 (t(3)), 3-78 days later. Differences in reliability coefficients, OHIP summary scores, and item responses, and the influence of time on score differences were analyzed. RESULTS: Some evidence of retest effects in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was found (the difference in reliability coefficients between t(1)-t(2) and t(2)-t(3) was 0.08; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support repeated OHRQoL assessment over short periods of time when perceived oral health is rapidly changing. This is important because many oral conditions have acute symptoms and treatments have immediate OHRQoL effects that need to be measured.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 66
SP - 135
EP - 138
JO - ACTA ODONTOL SCAND
JF - ACTA ODONTOL SCAND
SN - 0001-6357
IS - 3
M1 - 3
ER -
