Neural signature of delayed fear generalization under stress

Standard

Neural signature of delayed fear generalization under stress. / Kausche, Franziska Magdalena; Zerbes, Gundula; Kampermann, Lea; Büchel, Christian; Schwabe, Lars.

in: PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, Jahrgang 58, Nr. 11, 11.2021, S. e13917.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Kausche, FM, Zerbes, G, Kampermann, L, Büchel, C & Schwabe, L 2021, 'Neural signature of delayed fear generalization under stress', PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, Jg. 58, Nr. 11, S. e13917. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13917

APA

Kausche, F. M., Zerbes, G., Kampermann, L., Büchel, C., & Schwabe, L. (2021). Neural signature of delayed fear generalization under stress. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 58(11), e13917. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13917

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3bebee049b274b49b06b5c4a9778739d,
title = "Neural signature of delayed fear generalization under stress",
abstract = "Although the generalization of fear to stimuli resembling a threatening stimulus is an adaptive mechanism, fear overgeneralization is maladaptive and thought to play a key role in anxiety-related disorders. Since there is typically a delay between an initial fear experience and a situation in which fear (over)generalization may occur, we assessed delayed fear generalization and its neural signature. Moreover, as stress is known to affect fear learning, we further tested whether acute stress modulates fear generalization. Therefore, we conducted a two-day fear generalization study, with initial fear acquisition on Day 1 and a fear generalization test after a 24-hr delay in the MRI scanner. Prior to fear generalization testing, participants were exposed to a stressor or a control manipulation. Our behavioral data showed the expected generalization of fear. At a neural level, fear generalization was accompanied by increased fear-signaling for stimuli that resembled the conditioned stimulus in the bilateral insula and frontal operculum, whereas activity declined in frontal, hippocampal, and temporal regions, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, as stimuli became more similar to the conditioned stimulus. Importantly, stress did not modulate fear generalization, neither on a behavioral nor on a neural level. Interestingly, in an explorative comparison to two other studies that used the same paradigm but tested generalization immediately after acquisition, we observed increased fear generalization in the delayed relative to the immediate generalization test. In sum, our results suggest that stress leaves fear generalization and its neural signature unaffected but that a temporal delay might increase the extent to which fear responses are generalized to stimuli resembling the threatening stimulus.",
author = "Kausche, {Franziska Magdalena} and Gundula Zerbes and Lea Kampermann and Christian B{\"u}chel and Lars Schwabe",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research.",
year = "2021",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/psyp.13917",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "e13917",
journal = "PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY",
issn = "0048-5772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural signature of delayed fear generalization under stress

AU - Kausche, Franziska Magdalena

AU - Zerbes, Gundula

AU - Kampermann, Lea

AU - Büchel, Christian

AU - Schwabe, Lars

N1 - © 2021 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research.

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - Although the generalization of fear to stimuli resembling a threatening stimulus is an adaptive mechanism, fear overgeneralization is maladaptive and thought to play a key role in anxiety-related disorders. Since there is typically a delay between an initial fear experience and a situation in which fear (over)generalization may occur, we assessed delayed fear generalization and its neural signature. Moreover, as stress is known to affect fear learning, we further tested whether acute stress modulates fear generalization. Therefore, we conducted a two-day fear generalization study, with initial fear acquisition on Day 1 and a fear generalization test after a 24-hr delay in the MRI scanner. Prior to fear generalization testing, participants were exposed to a stressor or a control manipulation. Our behavioral data showed the expected generalization of fear. At a neural level, fear generalization was accompanied by increased fear-signaling for stimuli that resembled the conditioned stimulus in the bilateral insula and frontal operculum, whereas activity declined in frontal, hippocampal, and temporal regions, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, as stimuli became more similar to the conditioned stimulus. Importantly, stress did not modulate fear generalization, neither on a behavioral nor on a neural level. Interestingly, in an explorative comparison to two other studies that used the same paradigm but tested generalization immediately after acquisition, we observed increased fear generalization in the delayed relative to the immediate generalization test. In sum, our results suggest that stress leaves fear generalization and its neural signature unaffected but that a temporal delay might increase the extent to which fear responses are generalized to stimuli resembling the threatening stimulus.

AB - Although the generalization of fear to stimuli resembling a threatening stimulus is an adaptive mechanism, fear overgeneralization is maladaptive and thought to play a key role in anxiety-related disorders. Since there is typically a delay between an initial fear experience and a situation in which fear (over)generalization may occur, we assessed delayed fear generalization and its neural signature. Moreover, as stress is known to affect fear learning, we further tested whether acute stress modulates fear generalization. Therefore, we conducted a two-day fear generalization study, with initial fear acquisition on Day 1 and a fear generalization test after a 24-hr delay in the MRI scanner. Prior to fear generalization testing, participants were exposed to a stressor or a control manipulation. Our behavioral data showed the expected generalization of fear. At a neural level, fear generalization was accompanied by increased fear-signaling for stimuli that resembled the conditioned stimulus in the bilateral insula and frontal operculum, whereas activity declined in frontal, hippocampal, and temporal regions, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, as stimuli became more similar to the conditioned stimulus. Importantly, stress did not modulate fear generalization, neither on a behavioral nor on a neural level. Interestingly, in an explorative comparison to two other studies that used the same paradigm but tested generalization immediately after acquisition, we observed increased fear generalization in the delayed relative to the immediate generalization test. In sum, our results suggest that stress leaves fear generalization and its neural signature unaffected but that a temporal delay might increase the extent to which fear responses are generalized to stimuli resembling the threatening stimulus.

U2 - 10.1111/psyp.13917

DO - 10.1111/psyp.13917

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34365641

VL - 58

SP - e13917

JO - PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY

JF - PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY

SN - 0048-5772

IS - 11

ER -