PortalPublikationenMultiple Signifikanztests und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurtei...

Multiple Signifikanztests und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"

Standard

Multiple Signifikanztests und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". / Beck-Bornholdt, H P; Dubben, H H.

in: STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, Jahrgang 176, Nr. 8, 01.08.2000, S. 344-9.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Beck-Bornholdt, HP & Dubben, HH 2000, 'Multiple Signifikanztests und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"', STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, Jg. 176, Nr. 8, S. 344-9.

APA

Beck-Bornholdt, H. P., & Dubben, H. H. (2000). Multiple Signifikanztests und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, 176(8), 344-9.

Vancouver

Beck-Bornholdt HP, Dubben HH. Multiple Signifikanztests und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". STRAHLENTHER ONKOL. 2000 Aug 1;176(8):344-9.

Bibtex

@article{a6a0006217654963abfbd3e731d848e0,
title = "Multiple Signifikanztests und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualit{\"a}tsanalyse der Zeitschrift {"}Strahlentherapie und Onkologie{"}",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to {"}Strahlentherapie und Onkologie{"} is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories {"}review{"}, {"}original contribution{"}, and {"}short communication{"} were analyzed concerning the appropriate use of multiple tests.RESULT: One hundred and four publications were excluded from analysis, because they did not contain quantitative data or because no or only 1 statistical test was performed. In 77 publications multiple tests were done which was adequately considered in only 3 of these papers, corresponding to a fraction of 4% (95% CI: 0.8 to 11%).CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on correction for multiple tests.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, Germany, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Periodicals as Topic, Quality Control, Radiotherapy",
author = "Beck-Bornholdt, {H P} and Dubben, {H H}",
year = "2000",
month = aug,
day = "1",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "176",
pages = "344--9",
journal = "STRAHLENTHER ONKOL",
issn = "0179-7158",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple Signifikanztests und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"

AU - Beck-Bornholdt, H P

AU - Dubben, H H

PY - 2000/8/1

Y1 - 2000/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning the appropriate use of multiple tests.RESULT: One hundred and four publications were excluded from analysis, because they did not contain quantitative data or because no or only 1 statistical test was performed. In 77 publications multiple tests were done which was adequately considered in only 3 of these papers, corresponding to a fraction of 4% (95% CI: 0.8 to 11%).CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on correction for multiple tests.

AB - BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning the appropriate use of multiple tests.RESULT: One hundred and four publications were excluded from analysis, because they did not contain quantitative data or because no or only 1 statistical test was performed. In 77 publications multiple tests were done which was adequately considered in only 3 of these papers, corresponding to a fraction of 4% (95% CI: 0.8 to 11%).CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on correction for multiple tests.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Medical Oncology

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Periodicals as Topic

KW - Quality Control

KW - Radiotherapy

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 10987016

VL - 176

SP - 344

EP - 349

JO - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

JF - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

SN - 0179-7158

IS - 8

ER -