PortalPublikationenMetacognitive training modified for negative symptoms: A fea...

Metacognitive training modified for negative symptoms: A feasibility study

Standard

Metacognitive training modified for negative symptoms: A feasibility study. / Swanson, Linda; Schwannauer, Matthias; Bird, Tim; Eliasson, Emma; Millar, Audrey; Moritz, Steffen; Griffiths, Helen.

in: CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, Jahrgang 29, Nr. 3, 05.2022, S. 1068-1079.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Swanson, L, Schwannauer, M, Bird, T, Eliasson, E, Millar, A, Moritz, S & Griffiths, H 2022, 'Metacognitive training modified for negative symptoms: A feasibility study', CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, Jg. 29, Nr. 3, S. 1068-1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2692

APA

Swanson, L., Schwannauer, M., Bird, T., Eliasson, E., Millar, A., Moritz, S., & Griffiths, H. (2022). Metacognitive training modified for negative symptoms: A feasibility study. CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, 29(3), 1068-1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2692

Vancouver

Swanson L, Schwannauer M, Bird T, Eliasson E, Millar A, Moritz S et al. Metacognitive training modified for negative symptoms: A feasibility study. CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT. 2022 Mai;29(3):1068-1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2692

Bibtex

@article{a0906ca629e5489bac98894015df021b,
title = "Metacognitive training modified for negative symptoms: A feasibility study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Although patients often prioritize the treatment of negative symptoms, few psychological interventions targeting negative symptoms exist. This study attempts to fill this gap by piloting a modified metacognitive training programme, specifically targeted at negative symptoms (MCT-N), with a group of patients with prominent negative symptoms.METHOD: We adopted a mixed methods case series design, providing detailed quantitative data on changes over time, to focus on potential mechanisms underlying the intervention, in combination with qualitative interviews.RESULTS: The intervention showed good feasibility as demonstrated by the attendance rate, the positive feedback from participants and the multidisciplinary team, and the improvements on negative symptoms observed following the intervention. Multilevel modelling showed that depression, internalized stigma and reflective functioning explained the variance in negative symptoms.DISCUSSION: The pilot study indicated that the intervention has high feasibility and that improvements in negative symptoms can be partially explained by improvements on depression, stigma and reflective functioning.",
keywords = "Feasibility Studies, Humans, Metacognition, Pilot Projects, Social Stigma",
author = "Linda Swanson and Matthias Schwannauer and Tim Bird and Emma Eliasson and Audrey Millar and Steffen Moritz and Helen Griffiths",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
doi = "10.1002/cpp.2692",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1068--1079",
journal = "CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT",
issn = "1063-3995",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metacognitive training modified for negative symptoms: A feasibility study

AU - Swanson, Linda

AU - Schwannauer, Matthias

AU - Bird, Tim

AU - Eliasson, Emma

AU - Millar, Audrey

AU - Moritz, Steffen

AU - Griffiths, Helen

N1 - © 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2022/5

Y1 - 2022/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Although patients often prioritize the treatment of negative symptoms, few psychological interventions targeting negative symptoms exist. This study attempts to fill this gap by piloting a modified metacognitive training programme, specifically targeted at negative symptoms (MCT-N), with a group of patients with prominent negative symptoms.METHOD: We adopted a mixed methods case series design, providing detailed quantitative data on changes over time, to focus on potential mechanisms underlying the intervention, in combination with qualitative interviews.RESULTS: The intervention showed good feasibility as demonstrated by the attendance rate, the positive feedback from participants and the multidisciplinary team, and the improvements on negative symptoms observed following the intervention. Multilevel modelling showed that depression, internalized stigma and reflective functioning explained the variance in negative symptoms.DISCUSSION: The pilot study indicated that the intervention has high feasibility and that improvements in negative symptoms can be partially explained by improvements on depression, stigma and reflective functioning.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Although patients often prioritize the treatment of negative symptoms, few psychological interventions targeting negative symptoms exist. This study attempts to fill this gap by piloting a modified metacognitive training programme, specifically targeted at negative symptoms (MCT-N), with a group of patients with prominent negative symptoms.METHOD: We adopted a mixed methods case series design, providing detailed quantitative data on changes over time, to focus on potential mechanisms underlying the intervention, in combination with qualitative interviews.RESULTS: The intervention showed good feasibility as demonstrated by the attendance rate, the positive feedback from participants and the multidisciplinary team, and the improvements on negative symptoms observed following the intervention. Multilevel modelling showed that depression, internalized stigma and reflective functioning explained the variance in negative symptoms.DISCUSSION: The pilot study indicated that the intervention has high feasibility and that improvements in negative symptoms can be partially explained by improvements on depression, stigma and reflective functioning.

KW - Feasibility Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Metacognition

KW - Pilot Projects

KW - Social Stigma

U2 - 10.1002/cpp.2692

DO - 10.1002/cpp.2692

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34792834

VL - 29

SP - 1068

EP - 1079

JO - CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT

JF - CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT

SN - 1063-3995

IS - 3

ER -