Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments


Standard

Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments
. / Moritz, Steffen; Klein, Jan Philipp; Lysaker, Paul H; Mehl, Stephanie.

in: DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO, Jahrgang 21, Nr. 3, 09.2019, S. 309-317.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{4c54aa2c6a9a426d97344791417382da,
title = "Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments
",
abstract = "This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition ({"}cognition about cognition{"}). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some {"}metacognitive knowledge{"} (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy.
.",
keywords = "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods, Humans, Metacognition/physiology, Psychotic Disorders/psychology",
author = "Steffen Moritz and Klein, {Jan Philipp} and Lysaker, {Paul H} and Stephanie Mehl",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2019, AICH – Servier GroupCopyright {\textcopyright} 2019 AICH – Servier Group. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
doi = "10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "309--317",
journal = "DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO",
issn = "1294-8322",
publisher = "Servier International",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments


AU - Moritz, Steffen

AU - Klein, Jan Philipp

AU - Lysaker, Paul H

AU - Mehl, Stephanie

N1 - © 2019, AICH – Servier GroupCopyright © 2019 AICH – Servier Group. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition ("cognition about cognition"). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some "metacognitive knowledge" (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy.
.

AB - This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition ("cognition about cognition"). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some "metacognitive knowledge" (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy.
.

KW - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Metacognition/physiology

KW - Psychotic Disorders/psychology

U2 - 10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz

DO - 10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 31749655

VL - 21

SP - 309

EP - 317

JO - DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO

JF - DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO

SN - 1294-8322

IS - 3

ER -