Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.
Standard
Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments. / Scholl, Isabelle; Marije, Koelewijn-van Loon; Sepucha, Karen; Elwyn, Glyn; Légaré, France; Härter, Martin; Dirmaier, Jörg.
in: Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q, Jahrgang 105, Nr. 4, 4, 2011, S. 313-324.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.
AU - Scholl, Isabelle
AU - Marije, Koelewijn-van Loon
AU - Sepucha, Karen
AU - Elwyn, Glyn
AU - Légaré, France
AU - Härter, Martin
AU - Dirmaier, Jörg
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - The last years have seen a clear move towards shared decision making (SDM) and increased patient involvement in many countries. However, as the field of SDM research is still relatively young, new instruments for the measurement of (shared) decision making (process, outcome and surrounding elements) are constantly being developed. Thus, the aims of this structured review were to give an update on current developments regarding the measurement in the field of SDM, as well as to give a short overview of published and unpublished instruments. We conducted an electronic literature search in PubMed and the Web of Science database, performed hand searches of relevant journals and contacted key authors in the field. We found eight scales that have been subjected to further psychometric testing, eleven new and psychometrically tested instruments and nine developments that are still in the publishing process. The results show that there is a trend towards measuring SDM processes from a dyadic approach (assessing both the patient's and the clinician's perspective). More and more scales have been developed and tested in languages other than English, which indicates the growing research efforts in various countries. While reliability of most scales is good, they differ in their extent of validation. Further psychometric testing is needed, as well as the development of a theoretical measurement framework in order to improve consistency of measured constructs across research groups.
AB - The last years have seen a clear move towards shared decision making (SDM) and increased patient involvement in many countries. However, as the field of SDM research is still relatively young, new instruments for the measurement of (shared) decision making (process, outcome and surrounding elements) are constantly being developed. Thus, the aims of this structured review were to give an update on current developments regarding the measurement in the field of SDM, as well as to give a short overview of published and unpublished instruments. We conducted an electronic literature search in PubMed and the Web of Science database, performed hand searches of relevant journals and contacted key authors in the field. We found eight scales that have been subjected to further psychometric testing, eleven new and psychometrically tested instruments and nine developments that are still in the publishing process. The results show that there is a trend towards measuring SDM processes from a dyadic approach (assessing both the patient's and the clinician's perspective). More and more scales have been developed and tested in languages other than English, which indicates the growing research efforts in various countries. While reliability of most scales is good, they differ in their extent of validation. Further psychometric testing is needed, as well as the development of a theoretical measurement framework in order to improve consistency of measured constructs across research groups.
KW - Humans
KW - Forecasting
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Consumer Participation/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Health Care Reform/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Health Policy/trends
KW - Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Internationality
KW - Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)/trends
KW - Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data
KW - Humans
KW - Forecasting
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Consumer Participation/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Health Care Reform/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Health Policy/trends
KW - Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Internationality
KW - Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)/trends
KW - Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data/trends
KW - Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
VL - 105
SP - 313
EP - 324
JO - Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q
JF - Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q
SN - 1865-9217
IS - 4
M1 - 4
ER -
