Measurement of healthcare quality in atopic dermatitis - development and application of a set of quality indicators
Standard
Measurement of healthcare quality in atopic dermatitis - development and application of a set of quality indicators. / Steinke, S; Beikert, F C; Langenbruch, A; Fölster-Holst, R; Ring, J; Schmitt, J; Werfel, T; Hintzen, S; Franzke, N; Augustin, M.
in: J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, Jahrgang 32, Nr. 12, 12.2018, S. 2237-2243.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement of healthcare quality in atopic dermatitis - development and application of a set of quality indicators
AU - Steinke, S
AU - Beikert, F C
AU - Langenbruch, A
AU - Fölster-Holst, R
AU - Ring, J
AU - Schmitt, J
AU - Werfel, T
AU - Hintzen, S
AU - Franzke, N
AU - Augustin, M
N1 - © 2018 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: Quality indicators are essential tools for the assessment of health care, in particular for guideline-based procedures.OBJECTIVE: Development of a set of indicators for the evaluation of process and outcomes quality in atopic dermatitis (AD) care. Application of the indicators to a cross-sectional study and creation of a global process quality index.METHODS: An expert committee consisting of 10 members of the German guideline group on AD condensed potential quality indicators to a final set of 5 outcomes quality and 12 process quality indicators using a Delphi panel. The outcomes quality and 7 resp. 8 process quality indicators were retrospectively applied to a nationwide study on 1678 patients with atopic dermatitis (AtopicHealth). Each individual process quality indicator score was then summed up to a global index (ranges from 0 [no quality achieved] to 100 [full quality achieved]) displaying the quality of health care.RESULTS: In total, the global process quality index revealed a median value of 62.5 and did not or only slightly correlate to outcomes quality indicators like the median SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD; rp = 0.08), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; rp = 0.256) and Patient Benefit Index (PBI; rp = -0.151).CONCLUSION: Process quality of AD care is moderate to good. The healthcare process quality index does not substantially correlate to the health status of AD patients measured by 5 different outcomes quality indicators. Further research should include the investigation of reliability, responsiveness and feasibility of the proposed quality indicators for AD.
AB - BACKGROUND: Quality indicators are essential tools for the assessment of health care, in particular for guideline-based procedures.OBJECTIVE: Development of a set of indicators for the evaluation of process and outcomes quality in atopic dermatitis (AD) care. Application of the indicators to a cross-sectional study and creation of a global process quality index.METHODS: An expert committee consisting of 10 members of the German guideline group on AD condensed potential quality indicators to a final set of 5 outcomes quality and 12 process quality indicators using a Delphi panel. The outcomes quality and 7 resp. 8 process quality indicators were retrospectively applied to a nationwide study on 1678 patients with atopic dermatitis (AtopicHealth). Each individual process quality indicator score was then summed up to a global index (ranges from 0 [no quality achieved] to 100 [full quality achieved]) displaying the quality of health care.RESULTS: In total, the global process quality index revealed a median value of 62.5 and did not or only slightly correlate to outcomes quality indicators like the median SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD; rp = 0.08), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; rp = 0.256) and Patient Benefit Index (PBI; rp = -0.151).CONCLUSION: Process quality of AD care is moderate to good. The healthcare process quality index does not substantially correlate to the health status of AD patients measured by 5 different outcomes quality indicators. Further research should include the investigation of reliability, responsiveness and feasibility of the proposed quality indicators for AD.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1111/jdv.15074
DO - 10.1111/jdv.15074
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 29763514
VL - 32
SP - 2237
EP - 2243
JO - J EUR ACAD DERMATOL
JF - J EUR ACAD DERMATOL
SN - 0926-9959
IS - 12
ER -