Management of patients who opt for radical prostatectomy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: An International Accelerated Consensus Statement

  • Zafer Tandogdu
  • Justin Collins
  • Greg Shaw
  • Jenifer Rohn
  • Bela Koves
  • Ashwin Sachdeva
  • Ahmed Ghazi
  • Alexander Haese
  • Alex Mottrie
  • Anup Kumar
  • Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman
  • Ashutosh Tewari
  • Benjamin Challacombe
  • Bernardo Rocco
  • Camilo Giedelman
  • Christian Wagner
  • Craig G Rogers
  • Declan G Murphy
  • Dmitry Pushkar
  • Gabriel Ogaya-Pinies
  • Jim Porter
  • Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam
  • Markus Graefen
  • Marcelo A Orvieto
  • Marcio Covas Moschovas
  • Oscar Schatloff
  • Peter Wiklund
  • Rafael Coelho
  • Rair Valero
  • Theo M de Reijke
  • Thomas Ahlering
  • Travis Rogers
  • Henk G van der Poel
  • Vipul Patel
  • Walter Artibani
  • Florian Wagenlehner
  • Senthil Nathan
  • Truls Erik Bjerklund Johansens
  • Peter Hawkey
  • John Kelly

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic caused delays in definitive treatment of patients with prostate cancer. Beyond the immediate delay a backlog for future patients is expected. The objective of this work is to develop guidance on criteria for prioritisation of surgery and reconfiguring management pathways for patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer who opt for surgical treatment. A second aim was to identify the infection prevention and control (IPC) measures to achieve a low likelihood of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hazard if radical prostatectomy (RP) was to be carried out during the outbreak and whilst the disease is endemic.

METHODS: We conducted an accelerated consensus process and systematic review of the evidence on COVID-19 and reviewed international guidance on prostate cancer. These were presented to an international prostate cancer expert panel (n = 34) through an online meeting. The consensus process underwent three rounds of survey in total. Additions to the second- and third-round surveys were formulated based on the answers and comments from the previous rounds. The Consensus opinion was defined as ≥80% agreement and this was used to reconfigure the prostate cancer pathways.

RESULTS: Evidence on the delayed management of patients with prostate cancer is scarce. There was 100% agreement that prostate cancer pathways should be reconfigured and measures developed to prevent nosocomial COVID-19 for patients treated surgically. Consensus was reached on prioritisation criteria of patients for surgery and management pathways for those who have delayed treatment. IPC measures to achieve a low likelihood of nosocomial COVID-19 were coined as 'COVID-19 cold' sites.

CONCLUSION: Reconfiguring management pathways for patients with prostate cancer is recommended if significant delay (>3-6 months) in surgical management is unavoidable. The mapped pathways provide guidance for such patients. The IPC processes proposed provide a framework for providing RP within an environment with low COVID-19 risk during the outbreak or when the disease remains endemic. The broader concepts could be adapted to other indications beyond prostate cancer surgery.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN1464-4096
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 06.2021
Extern publiziertJa
PubMed 33185026