Long-term follow-up in patients with indeterminate Barrett esophagus
Standard
Long-term follow-up in patients with indeterminate Barrett esophagus. / Becker, V; Bobardt, J; Ott, R; Rösch, T; Meining, A.
in: DIGESTION, Jahrgang 88, Nr. 3, 01.01.2013, S. 161-4.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term follow-up in patients with indeterminate Barrett esophagus
AU - Becker, V
AU - Bobardt, J
AU - Ott, R
AU - Rösch, T
AU - Meining, A
N1 - © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Barrett esophagus (BE) is a major risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. Reliable detection of BE during upper endoscopy is therefore mandatory. According to most guidelines, diagnosis of BE requires both endoscopy and histology for confirmation. However, since adenocarcinomas were also described in patients with indeterminate BE, i.e. endoscopic visible columnar metaplasia but no histological confirmation of goblet cells or vice versa, debate has risen on the risk of malignancy and the need for endoscopic surveillance in such patients.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was aimed to assess long-term follow-up data on 209 patients with indeterminate BE (on histopathology or endoscopy) initially examined between 1999 and 2000. Patients or referring physicians were contacted concerning the most recent endoscopic and histopathological results.RESULTS: Follow-up data could be assessed in 149/209 patients (65.1%) after a mean follow-up period of 9.4 years (SD ±2.4 years). Neoplasia was not reported for any patient. The previous endoscopic-histopathological diagnoses could be confirmed in 3 patients only. In the group with endoscopic diagnosis of BE but no histopathological confirmation, BE was described histopathologically in 1 patient during follow-up.CONCLUSION: Persistence of indeterminate BE is poor during long-term follow up. The risk of cancer appears to be negligible. Hence, surveillance of these patients appears equivocal.
AB - BACKGROUND: Barrett esophagus (BE) is a major risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. Reliable detection of BE during upper endoscopy is therefore mandatory. According to most guidelines, diagnosis of BE requires both endoscopy and histology for confirmation. However, since adenocarcinomas were also described in patients with indeterminate BE, i.e. endoscopic visible columnar metaplasia but no histological confirmation of goblet cells or vice versa, debate has risen on the risk of malignancy and the need for endoscopic surveillance in such patients.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was aimed to assess long-term follow-up data on 209 patients with indeterminate BE (on histopathology or endoscopy) initially examined between 1999 and 2000. Patients or referring physicians were contacted concerning the most recent endoscopic and histopathological results.RESULTS: Follow-up data could be assessed in 149/209 patients (65.1%) after a mean follow-up period of 9.4 years (SD ±2.4 years). Neoplasia was not reported for any patient. The previous endoscopic-histopathological diagnoses could be confirmed in 3 patients only. In the group with endoscopic diagnosis of BE but no histopathological confirmation, BE was described histopathologically in 1 patient during follow-up.CONCLUSION: Persistence of indeterminate BE is poor during long-term follow up. The risk of cancer appears to be negligible. Hence, surveillance of these patients appears equivocal.
KW - Adenocarcinoma
KW - Barrett Esophagus
KW - Esophageal Neoplasms
KW - Esophagoscopy
KW - Female
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Goblet Cells
KW - Humans
KW - Longitudinal Studies
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Precancerous Conditions
KW - Prognosis
U2 - 10.1159/000353600
DO - 10.1159/000353600
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 24080585
VL - 88
SP - 161
EP - 164
JO - DIGESTION
JF - DIGESTION
SN - 0012-2823
IS - 3
ER -