Long‐Term Effectiveness and Safety of Initiating Statin Therapy After Index Revascularization In Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Standard

Long‐Term Effectiveness and Safety of Initiating Statin Therapy After Index Revascularization In Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease. / Peters, Frederik; Kuchenbecker, Jenny; Kreutzburg, Thea; Marschall, Ursula; Debus, Sebastian; Behrendt, Christian-Alexander.

in: J AM HEART ASSOC, Jahrgang 9, Nr. 22, 17.11.2020.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8554f28cf8a84f70b38d41201c67cbcf,
title = "Long‐Term Effectiveness and Safety of Initiating Statin Therapy After Index Revascularization In Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease",
abstract = "BackgroundAn increasing number of patients with a peripheral arterial occlusive disease were put on statins during the past years. This study assessed whether statin therapy was effective and safe for these new users.Methods and ResultsUsing health insurance claims data from Germany{\textquoteright}s second‐largest insurance fund, BARMER, we identified patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease who had index revascularization between 2008 and 2018 without prior statin therapy. We compared patients with and without statin therapy in addition to antithrombotics during the first quarter after discharge (new users versus nonusers). Outcomes were all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and incident major amputation for effectiveness and incident diabetes mellitus and incident myopathy for safety. Propensity score matching was used to balance the study groups. All analyses were stratified into patients with chronic limb‐threatening ischemia and intermittent claudication. A total of 22 208 patients (mean age 71.1 years and 50.3% women) were included in the study. In 10 922 matched patients, statin initiation was associated with lower all‐cause mortality (chronic limb‐threatening ischemia: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68–0.84]; intermittent claudication: HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70–0.92]), lower risk of major amputation in patients with chronic limb‐threatening ischemia (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58–0.93) and lower risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70–0.92) in patients with intermittent claudication during 5 years of follow‐up. Safety outcomes did not differ among the study groups.ConclusionsInitiating statin therapy in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease after index revascularization is efficient and safe with an effect size comparable to earlier studies. Awareness campaigns for evidence‐based optimal pharmacological treatment among patients are recommended.",
author = "Frederik Peters and Jenny Kuchenbecker and Thea Kreutzburg and Ursula Marschall and Sebastian Debus and Christian-Alexander Behrendt",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1161/JAHA.120.018338",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "J AM HEART ASSOC",
issn = "2047-9980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "22",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long‐Term Effectiveness and Safety of Initiating Statin Therapy After Index Revascularization In Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

AU - Peters, Frederik

AU - Kuchenbecker, Jenny

AU - Kreutzburg, Thea

AU - Marschall, Ursula

AU - Debus, Sebastian

AU - Behrendt, Christian-Alexander

PY - 2020/11/17

Y1 - 2020/11/17

N2 - BackgroundAn increasing number of patients with a peripheral arterial occlusive disease were put on statins during the past years. This study assessed whether statin therapy was effective and safe for these new users.Methods and ResultsUsing health insurance claims data from Germany’s second‐largest insurance fund, BARMER, we identified patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease who had index revascularization between 2008 and 2018 without prior statin therapy. We compared patients with and without statin therapy in addition to antithrombotics during the first quarter after discharge (new users versus nonusers). Outcomes were all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and incident major amputation for effectiveness and incident diabetes mellitus and incident myopathy for safety. Propensity score matching was used to balance the study groups. All analyses were stratified into patients with chronic limb‐threatening ischemia and intermittent claudication. A total of 22 208 patients (mean age 71.1 years and 50.3% women) were included in the study. In 10 922 matched patients, statin initiation was associated with lower all‐cause mortality (chronic limb‐threatening ischemia: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68–0.84]; intermittent claudication: HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70–0.92]), lower risk of major amputation in patients with chronic limb‐threatening ischemia (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58–0.93) and lower risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70–0.92) in patients with intermittent claudication during 5 years of follow‐up. Safety outcomes did not differ among the study groups.ConclusionsInitiating statin therapy in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease after index revascularization is efficient and safe with an effect size comparable to earlier studies. Awareness campaigns for evidence‐based optimal pharmacological treatment among patients are recommended.

AB - BackgroundAn increasing number of patients with a peripheral arterial occlusive disease were put on statins during the past years. This study assessed whether statin therapy was effective and safe for these new users.Methods and ResultsUsing health insurance claims data from Germany’s second‐largest insurance fund, BARMER, we identified patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease who had index revascularization between 2008 and 2018 without prior statin therapy. We compared patients with and without statin therapy in addition to antithrombotics during the first quarter after discharge (new users versus nonusers). Outcomes were all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and incident major amputation for effectiveness and incident diabetes mellitus and incident myopathy for safety. Propensity score matching was used to balance the study groups. All analyses were stratified into patients with chronic limb‐threatening ischemia and intermittent claudication. A total of 22 208 patients (mean age 71.1 years and 50.3% women) were included in the study. In 10 922 matched patients, statin initiation was associated with lower all‐cause mortality (chronic limb‐threatening ischemia: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68–0.84]; intermittent claudication: HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70–0.92]), lower risk of major amputation in patients with chronic limb‐threatening ischemia (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58–0.93) and lower risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70–0.92) in patients with intermittent claudication during 5 years of follow‐up. Safety outcomes did not differ among the study groups.ConclusionsInitiating statin therapy in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease after index revascularization is efficient and safe with an effect size comparable to earlier studies. Awareness campaigns for evidence‐based optimal pharmacological treatment among patients are recommended.

U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.120.018338

DO - 10.1161/JAHA.120.018338

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 9

JO - J AM HEART ASSOC

JF - J AM HEART ASSOC

SN - 2047-9980

IS - 22

ER -