Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision.

Standard

Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision. / Neipp, Michael; Jackobs, Steffan; Becker, Thomas; Vilsendorf, Zu; Meyer, Andreas; Winny, Markus; Lueck, Rainer; Nashan, Björn; Nashan, Björn.

in: TRANSPLANTATION, Jahrgang 78, Nr. 9, 9, 2004, S. 1356-1361.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Neipp, M, Jackobs, S, Becker, T, Vilsendorf, Z, Meyer, A, Winny, M, Lueck, R, Nashan, B & Nashan, B 2004, 'Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision.', TRANSPLANTATION, Jg. 78, Nr. 9, 9, S. 1356-1361. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15548975?dopt=Citation>

APA

Neipp, M., Jackobs, S., Becker, T., Vilsendorf, Z., Meyer, A., Winny, M., Lueck, R., Nashan, B., & Nashan, B. (2004). Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision. TRANSPLANTATION, 78(9), 1356-1361. [9]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15548975?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Neipp M, Jackobs S, Becker T, Vilsendorf Z, Meyer A, Winny M et al. Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision. TRANSPLANTATION. 2004;78(9):1356-1361. 9.

Bibtex

@article{c348fe8c47ed4b428173cd9b35d2d79d,
title = "Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Currently, many centers perform laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (DN). We studied the outcome of donors and recipients following open DN using either flank incision (ODN) or mini-incision (MIDN). METHODS: Data of 196 living kidney donors were recorded prospectively. In 127 cases ODN and 69 cases MIDN were performed. RESULTS: Demographic details of donors were comparable for both groups. The left kidney was procured in 58% for ODN and in 64% for MIDN. Multiple arteries were more frequently present when MIDN (11% vs. 28%) was performed. The mean operating time was 129 min for ODN and 133 min for MIDN. Early complications occurred in 7% following ODN and in 4% following MIDN. Late complications were observed in 21% after ODN and 1% after MIDN. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer following ODN compared with MIDN (7.5 vs. 6.4 days). The primary graft function rate was 97% in both groups. One-year graft survival was 97% after ODN and 100% after MIDN. CONCLUSIONS: Results following MIDN are superior to those following ODN. Even in case of multiple renal vessels MIDN can be safely applied. In comparison with laparoscopic DN advantages of MIDN may be reduced costs, shorter operating time, and comparable cosmetic results.",
author = "Michael Neipp and Steffan Jackobs and Thomas Becker and Zu Vilsendorf and Andreas Meyer and Markus Winny and Rainer Lueck and Bj{\"o}rn Nashan and Bj{\"o}rn Nashan",
year = "2004",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "78",
pages = "1356--1361",
journal = "TRANSPLANTATION",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Living donor nephrectomy: flank incision versus anterior vertical mini-incision.

AU - Neipp, Michael

AU - Jackobs, Steffan

AU - Becker, Thomas

AU - Vilsendorf, Zu

AU - Meyer, Andreas

AU - Winny, Markus

AU - Lueck, Rainer

AU - Nashan, Björn

AU - Nashan, Björn

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - BACKGROUND: Currently, many centers perform laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (DN). We studied the outcome of donors and recipients following open DN using either flank incision (ODN) or mini-incision (MIDN). METHODS: Data of 196 living kidney donors were recorded prospectively. In 127 cases ODN and 69 cases MIDN were performed. RESULTS: Demographic details of donors were comparable for both groups. The left kidney was procured in 58% for ODN and in 64% for MIDN. Multiple arteries were more frequently present when MIDN (11% vs. 28%) was performed. The mean operating time was 129 min for ODN and 133 min for MIDN. Early complications occurred in 7% following ODN and in 4% following MIDN. Late complications were observed in 21% after ODN and 1% after MIDN. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer following ODN compared with MIDN (7.5 vs. 6.4 days). The primary graft function rate was 97% in both groups. One-year graft survival was 97% after ODN and 100% after MIDN. CONCLUSIONS: Results following MIDN are superior to those following ODN. Even in case of multiple renal vessels MIDN can be safely applied. In comparison with laparoscopic DN advantages of MIDN may be reduced costs, shorter operating time, and comparable cosmetic results.

AB - BACKGROUND: Currently, many centers perform laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (DN). We studied the outcome of donors and recipients following open DN using either flank incision (ODN) or mini-incision (MIDN). METHODS: Data of 196 living kidney donors were recorded prospectively. In 127 cases ODN and 69 cases MIDN were performed. RESULTS: Demographic details of donors were comparable for both groups. The left kidney was procured in 58% for ODN and in 64% for MIDN. Multiple arteries were more frequently present when MIDN (11% vs. 28%) was performed. The mean operating time was 129 min for ODN and 133 min for MIDN. Early complications occurred in 7% following ODN and in 4% following MIDN. Late complications were observed in 21% after ODN and 1% after MIDN. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer following ODN compared with MIDN (7.5 vs. 6.4 days). The primary graft function rate was 97% in both groups. One-year graft survival was 97% after ODN and 100% after MIDN. CONCLUSIONS: Results following MIDN are superior to those following ODN. Even in case of multiple renal vessels MIDN can be safely applied. In comparison with laparoscopic DN advantages of MIDN may be reduced costs, shorter operating time, and comparable cosmetic results.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 78

SP - 1356

EP - 1361

JO - TRANSPLANTATION

JF - TRANSPLANTATION

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 9

M1 - 9

ER -