Left atrial appendage morphology is closely associated with specific echocardiographic flow pattern in patients with atrial fibrillation
Standard
Left atrial appendage morphology is closely associated with specific echocardiographic flow pattern in patients with atrial fibrillation. / Petersen, Margot; Roehrich, Adalbert; Balzer, Jan; Shin, Dong-In; Meyer, Christian; Kelm, Malte; Kehmeier, Eva S.
in: EUROPACE, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 4, 04.2015, S. 539-545.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Left atrial appendage morphology is closely associated with specific echocardiographic flow pattern in patients with atrial fibrillation
AU - Petersen, Margot
AU - Roehrich, Adalbert
AU - Balzer, Jan
AU - Shin, Dong-In
AU - Meyer, Christian
AU - Kelm, Malte
AU - Kehmeier, Eva S
N1 - Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2015/4
Y1 - 2015/4
N2 - AIMS: To assess the relation between left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology and echocardiographic flow pattern of the LAA by means of two- and three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE).METHODS AND RESULTS: In a total of 131 patients with atrial fibrillation, LAA morphology was analyzed by 3D-TEE and classified into four types (Chicken Wing, Windsock, Cactus, Cauliflower). Left atrial appendage flow pattern as maximal LAA emptying flow velocity and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) were retrieved from 2D-TEE imaging in all patients. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), Chicken Wing morphology was associated with a higher LAA emptying flow velocity (difference of means = -11.7, 95% CI 4.6-19.3, P = 0.003) and a reduced prevalence of SEC (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-9.3, P = 0.025) compared with all other LAA types (so-called 'Non-Chicken Wing' LAA). These alterations were irrespective of the underlying type of AF.CONCLUSION: Non-Chicken Wing LAA morphologies are associated with a specific echocardiographic flow pattern in patients with AF. Since evidence exists that LAA flow pattern are indicative of an enhanced risk of thrombus formation, 3D-TEE might be a valuable tool warranting future studies to test whether these morphological and functional characteristics permit risk stratification in AF.
AB - AIMS: To assess the relation between left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology and echocardiographic flow pattern of the LAA by means of two- and three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE).METHODS AND RESULTS: In a total of 131 patients with atrial fibrillation, LAA morphology was analyzed by 3D-TEE and classified into four types (Chicken Wing, Windsock, Cactus, Cauliflower). Left atrial appendage flow pattern as maximal LAA emptying flow velocity and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) were retrieved from 2D-TEE imaging in all patients. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), Chicken Wing morphology was associated with a higher LAA emptying flow velocity (difference of means = -11.7, 95% CI 4.6-19.3, P = 0.003) and a reduced prevalence of SEC (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-9.3, P = 0.025) compared with all other LAA types (so-called 'Non-Chicken Wing' LAA). These alterations were irrespective of the underlying type of AF.CONCLUSION: Non-Chicken Wing LAA morphologies are associated with a specific echocardiographic flow pattern in patients with AF. Since evidence exists that LAA flow pattern are indicative of an enhanced risk of thrombus formation, 3D-TEE might be a valuable tool warranting future studies to test whether these morphological and functional characteristics permit risk stratification in AF.
KW - Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging
KW - Atrial Fibrillation/complications
KW - Blood Flow Velocity
KW - Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional/methods
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging
U2 - 10.1093/europace/euu347
DO - 10.1093/europace/euu347
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 25491111
VL - 17
SP - 539
EP - 545
JO - EUROPACE
JF - EUROPACE
SN - 1099-5129
IS - 4
ER -