Kostensätze zur monetären Bewertung von Versorgungsleistungen bei psychischen Erkrankungen

Standard

Kostensätze zur monetären Bewertung von Versorgungsleistungen bei psychischen Erkrankungen. / Grupp, H; König, H-H; Konnopka, A.

in: GESUNDHEITSWESEN, Jahrgang 79, Nr. 1, 01.2017, S. 48-57.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{0a01a22daef842ab9089d40ea70be703,
title = "Kostens{\"a}tze zur monet{\"a}ren Bewertung von Versorgungsleistungen bei psychischen Erkrankungen",
abstract = "Introduction: Assessing resource utilisation and costs for treating mental disorders in Germany is difficult. This pertains especially to the numerous non-medical services that are financed by a considerable number of payers. To standardise and simplify cost calculation, we created a database of unit costs for the most important services for mental disorders. Method: We performed a literature and internet search to identify services provided to persons with mental disorders. Unit costs were calculated either by means of public statistics or data directly obtained from payers. If data could not be obtained that way, health care providers were interviewed to collect data relevant for cost estimation. Results: Unit costs were calculated for medical and vocational rehabilitation, assisted living, sociopsychiatric services, counselling centres, daycare facilities, ambulant psychiatric nursing care, occupational therapy, sociotherapy, psychoeducation, caretaker, domestic help, creative therapies, physical therapy, and relaxation techniques. Discussion and Conclusion: Calculating unit costs for non-medical services was essential, since these services constitute a central element in the treatment of persons with mental disorders. Nevertheless, the large amount of different services and payers complicated a comprehensive assessment of costs. Thus, uncertainty associated with the calculation of costs should be taken into account.",
author = "H Grupp and H-H K{\"o}nig and A Konnopka",
note = "{\textcopyright} Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1055/s-0035-1555950",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "79",
pages = "48--57",
journal = "GESUNDHEITSWESEN",
issn = "0941-3790",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kostensätze zur monetären Bewertung von Versorgungsleistungen bei psychischen Erkrankungen

AU - Grupp, H

AU - König, H-H

AU - Konnopka, A

N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Introduction: Assessing resource utilisation and costs for treating mental disorders in Germany is difficult. This pertains especially to the numerous non-medical services that are financed by a considerable number of payers. To standardise and simplify cost calculation, we created a database of unit costs for the most important services for mental disorders. Method: We performed a literature and internet search to identify services provided to persons with mental disorders. Unit costs were calculated either by means of public statistics or data directly obtained from payers. If data could not be obtained that way, health care providers were interviewed to collect data relevant for cost estimation. Results: Unit costs were calculated for medical and vocational rehabilitation, assisted living, sociopsychiatric services, counselling centres, daycare facilities, ambulant psychiatric nursing care, occupational therapy, sociotherapy, psychoeducation, caretaker, domestic help, creative therapies, physical therapy, and relaxation techniques. Discussion and Conclusion: Calculating unit costs for non-medical services was essential, since these services constitute a central element in the treatment of persons with mental disorders. Nevertheless, the large amount of different services and payers complicated a comprehensive assessment of costs. Thus, uncertainty associated with the calculation of costs should be taken into account.

AB - Introduction: Assessing resource utilisation and costs for treating mental disorders in Germany is difficult. This pertains especially to the numerous non-medical services that are financed by a considerable number of payers. To standardise and simplify cost calculation, we created a database of unit costs for the most important services for mental disorders. Method: We performed a literature and internet search to identify services provided to persons with mental disorders. Unit costs were calculated either by means of public statistics or data directly obtained from payers. If data could not be obtained that way, health care providers were interviewed to collect data relevant for cost estimation. Results: Unit costs were calculated for medical and vocational rehabilitation, assisted living, sociopsychiatric services, counselling centres, daycare facilities, ambulant psychiatric nursing care, occupational therapy, sociotherapy, psychoeducation, caretaker, domestic help, creative therapies, physical therapy, and relaxation techniques. Discussion and Conclusion: Calculating unit costs for non-medical services was essential, since these services constitute a central element in the treatment of persons with mental disorders. Nevertheless, the large amount of different services and payers complicated a comprehensive assessment of costs. Thus, uncertainty associated with the calculation of costs should be taken into account.

U2 - 10.1055/s-0035-1555950

DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1555950

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 26402381

VL - 79

SP - 48

EP - 57

JO - GESUNDHEITSWESEN

JF - GESUNDHEITSWESEN

SN - 0941-3790

IS - 1

ER -