Kommentar aus der Praxis zu: Lungenembolie: Wie zuverlässig und sicher sind Vena-Cava-Filter?
Standard
Kommentar aus der Praxis zu: Lungenembolie: Wie zuverlässig und sicher sind Vena-Cava-Filter? / Kluge, Stefan.
in: DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR, Jahrgang 140, Nr. 17, 08.2015, S. 1258.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › Andere (Vorworte u.ä.) › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Kommentar aus der Praxis zu: Lungenembolie: Wie zuverlässig und sicher sind Vena-Cava-Filter?
AU - Kluge, Stefan
PY - 2015/8
Y1 - 2015/8
N2 - In the last 30 years patients with pulmonary embolism have increasingly often been implanted with a vena cava filter. Evidence of safety and efficacy in comparison to pure anticoagulation are in short supply. Re-removable filter reduces neither the risk of recurrence nor mortality, according to a study now revealed.
AB - In the last 30 years patients with pulmonary embolism have increasingly often been implanted with a vena cava filter. Evidence of safety and efficacy in comparison to pure anticoagulation are in short supply. Re-removable filter reduces neither the risk of recurrence nor mortality, according to a study now revealed.
KW - Age Distribution
KW - Causality
KW - Comorbidity
KW - Heart Failure
KW - Hematoma
KW - Humans
KW - Incidence
KW - Prosthesis Failure
KW - Pulmonary Embolism
KW - Risk Assessment
KW - Survival Rate
KW - Thrombosis
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Vena Cava Filters
U2 - 10.1055/s-0041-102783
DO - 10.1055/s-0041-102783
M3 - Andere (Vorworte u.ä.)
C2 - 26306011
VL - 140
SP - 1258
JO - DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR
JF - DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR
SN - 0012-0472
IS - 17
ER -