PortalPublikationenKnowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional ...

Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals

Standard

Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals. / Schori, Dominik; Jaeger, Matthias; Elmer, Timon; Jaeger, Susanne; Mahlke, Candelaria; Heumann, Kolja; Theodoridou, Anastasia; Zuaboni, Gianfranco; Kozel, Bernd; Rabenschlag, Franziska.

in: ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS, Jahrgang 32, Nr. 5, 10.2018, S. 662-669.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Schori, D, Jaeger, M, Elmer, T, Jaeger, S, Mahlke, C, Heumann, K, Theodoridou, A, Zuaboni, G, Kozel, B & Rabenschlag, F 2018, 'Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals', ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS, Jg. 32, Nr. 5, S. 662-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.005

APA

Schori, D., Jaeger, M., Elmer, T., Jaeger, S., Mahlke, C., Heumann, K., Theodoridou, A., Zuaboni, G., Kozel, B., & Rabenschlag, F. (2018). Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals. ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS, 32(5), 662-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.005

Vancouver

Schori D, Jaeger M, Elmer T, Jaeger S, Mahlke C, Heumann K et al. Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals. ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS. 2018 Okt;32(5):662-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.005

Bibtex

@article{841937279647461182e21fd4d0c032dd,
title = "Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals",
abstract = "Treatment pressure restricts patients' voluntary and autonomous decisions. Yet interventions involving treatment pressure are widely used in mental health and psychosocial services. This cross-sectional study explored whether mental health professionals' knowledge on five types of treatment pressure (no coercion, persuasion or conviction, leverage, threat, and formal coercion) was associated with sociodemographic, professional and contextual factors. A more positive attitude towards interventions involving treatment pressure was associated with underrating the level of those interventions compared with a predefined default value. The treatment setting and professional group played a minor role in 'leverage' and 'formal coercion' types of treatment pressure, respectively.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Dominik Schori and Matthias Jaeger and Timon Elmer and Susanne Jaeger and Candelaria Mahlke and Kolja Heumann and Anastasia Theodoridou and Gianfranco Zuaboni and Bernd Kozel and Franziska Rabenschlag",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.005",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "662--669",
journal = "ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS",
issn = "0883-9417",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals

AU - Schori, Dominik

AU - Jaeger, Matthias

AU - Elmer, Timon

AU - Jaeger, Susanne

AU - Mahlke, Candelaria

AU - Heumann, Kolja

AU - Theodoridou, Anastasia

AU - Zuaboni, Gianfranco

AU - Kozel, Bernd

AU - Rabenschlag, Franziska

N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Treatment pressure restricts patients' voluntary and autonomous decisions. Yet interventions involving treatment pressure are widely used in mental health and psychosocial services. This cross-sectional study explored whether mental health professionals' knowledge on five types of treatment pressure (no coercion, persuasion or conviction, leverage, threat, and formal coercion) was associated with sociodemographic, professional and contextual factors. A more positive attitude towards interventions involving treatment pressure was associated with underrating the level of those interventions compared with a predefined default value. The treatment setting and professional group played a minor role in 'leverage' and 'formal coercion' types of treatment pressure, respectively.

AB - Treatment pressure restricts patients' voluntary and autonomous decisions. Yet interventions involving treatment pressure are widely used in mental health and psychosocial services. This cross-sectional study explored whether mental health professionals' knowledge on five types of treatment pressure (no coercion, persuasion or conviction, leverage, threat, and formal coercion) was associated with sociodemographic, professional and contextual factors. A more positive attitude towards interventions involving treatment pressure was associated with underrating the level of those interventions compared with a predefined default value. The treatment setting and professional group played a minor role in 'leverage' and 'formal coercion' types of treatment pressure, respectively.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.005

DO - 10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.005

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30201193

VL - 32

SP - 662

EP - 669

JO - ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS

JF - ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS

SN - 0883-9417

IS - 5

ER -