Jumping to negative conclusions--a case of study-gathering bias? A reply by the developers of metacognitive training (MCT) to the meta-analysis of van Oosterhout et al. (2015)
Standard
Jumping to negative conclusions--a case of study-gathering bias? A reply by the developers of metacognitive training (MCT) to the meta-analysis of van Oosterhout et al. (2015). / Moritz, S; Werner, D; Menon, M; Balzan, R P; Woodward, T S.
in: PSYCHOL MED, Jahrgang 46, Nr. 1, 01.2016, S. 59-61.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › Andere (Vorworte u.ä.) › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Jumping to negative conclusions--a case of study-gathering bias? A reply by the developers of metacognitive training (MCT) to the meta-analysis of van Oosterhout et al. (2015)
AU - Moritz, S
AU - Werner, D
AU - Menon, M
AU - Balzan, R P
AU - Woodward, T S
N1 - Letter
PY - 2016/1
Y1 - 2016/1
U2 - 10.1017/S0033291715002068
DO - 10.1017/S0033291715002068
M3 - Other (editorial matter etc.)
C2 - 26490783
VL - 46
SP - 59
EP - 61
JO - PSYCHOL MED
JF - PSYCHOL MED
SN - 0033-2917
IS - 1
ER -