Je schwieriger, desto beliebter. Nutzen, didaktische Qualität und Schwierigkeitsgrad des vorklinischen Lehrangebots aus der Sicht von Hamburger Medizinstudenten
Standard
Je schwieriger, desto beliebter. Nutzen, didaktische Qualität und Schwierigkeitsgrad des vorklinischen Lehrangebots aus der Sicht von Hamburger Medizinstudenten. / Kohler, Nikolaj; Bussche van den, Hendrik.
in: ANN ANAT, Jahrgang 186, Nr. 3, 06.2004, S. 283-8.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Je schwieriger, desto beliebter. Nutzen, didaktische Qualität und Schwierigkeitsgrad des vorklinischen Lehrangebots aus der Sicht von Hamburger Medizinstudenten
AU - Kohler, Nikolaj
AU - Bussche van den, Hendrik
PY - 2004/6
Y1 - 2004/6
N2 - This paper reports the results of a retrospective evaluation of the quality of the preclinical undergraduate training by fifth year medical students at Hamburg Medical Faculty in 2001 by means of a standardized survey. The return rate was 88% (N = 150). Students were rather critical about the quality of their preclinical training as a whole. They critisize a decrease in study motivation and express the feeling that the preclincal phase was not very useful for their actual clinical training. They demand a more clinically and patient oriented education, smaller groups and less "cramming". The evaluation results concerning the single disciplines were more favorable for the most important subjects. Especially anatomy, followed by physiology were best rated both with regard to learning benefit and to didactic quality. Most student opinions did not depend on sex, age or examination results. A positive correlation between learning benefit, didactic quality and degree of difficulty was found: contrary to prejudice difficult courses were rated higher with regard to learning benefit and educational quality.
AB - This paper reports the results of a retrospective evaluation of the quality of the preclinical undergraduate training by fifth year medical students at Hamburg Medical Faculty in 2001 by means of a standardized survey. The return rate was 88% (N = 150). Students were rather critical about the quality of their preclinical training as a whole. They critisize a decrease in study motivation and express the feeling that the preclincal phase was not very useful for their actual clinical training. They demand a more clinically and patient oriented education, smaller groups and less "cramming". The evaluation results concerning the single disciplines were more favorable for the most important subjects. Especially anatomy, followed by physiology were best rated both with regard to learning benefit and to didactic quality. Most student opinions did not depend on sex, age or examination results. A positive correlation between learning benefit, didactic quality and degree of difficulty was found: contrary to prejudice difficult courses were rated higher with regard to learning benefit and educational quality.
KW - Anatomy
KW - Education, Medical
KW - Germany
KW - Humans
KW - Students, Medical
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
C2 - 15255306
VL - 186
SP - 283
EP - 288
JO - ANN ANAT
JF - ANN ANAT
SN - 0940-9602
IS - 3
ER -