Ist Radio(chemo)therapie wirklich der zukünftige Standard für die Behandlung von Oropharynxkarzinomen?

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ist Radio(chemo)therapie wirklich der zukünftige Standard für die Behandlung von Oropharynxkarzinomen?

AU - Knecht, R

AU - Bussmann, L

AU - Möckelmann, N

AU - Lörincz, B B

PY - 2016/3/18

Y1 - 2016/3/18

N2 - Treatment of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) requires interdisciplinary collaboration. Besides oncologic control, organ and function preservation are important priorities. One treatment option is primary concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), particularly for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Another option is sequential CRT, where induction chemotherapy may be followed either by radiation alone or by CRT. An important aspect of these modalities is the development of functional sequelae with regards to swallowing as a direct consequence of radiogenic fibrosis, as well as tissue ctoxicity associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Conventional open surgical approaches are being increasingly replaced by transoral surgical modalities with less treatment-related morbidity. As a further, equally important goal of appropriately indicated surgery, adjuvant (C)RT may be omitted or the dose significantly reduced. The advantages of primary surgery over primary CRT may be less obvious in cases still requiring adjuvant treatment, although not necessarily completely eliminated. For patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven OPSCC, it is important to note that primary surgery may provide comparable or even increased survival benefit. To date, there is no evidence for a clear advantage of primary CRT over primary surgery in this group. In these cases, a de-escalated treatment package may be the preferred option. Here, the application of radioimmunotherapy as well as a reduced radiation dose may minimize long-term treatment-related morbidities.

AB - Treatment of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) requires interdisciplinary collaboration. Besides oncologic control, organ and function preservation are important priorities. One treatment option is primary concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), particularly for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Another option is sequential CRT, where induction chemotherapy may be followed either by radiation alone or by CRT. An important aspect of these modalities is the development of functional sequelae with regards to swallowing as a direct consequence of radiogenic fibrosis, as well as tissue ctoxicity associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Conventional open surgical approaches are being increasingly replaced by transoral surgical modalities with less treatment-related morbidity. As a further, equally important goal of appropriately indicated surgery, adjuvant (C)RT may be omitted or the dose significantly reduced. The advantages of primary surgery over primary CRT may be less obvious in cases still requiring adjuvant treatment, although not necessarily completely eliminated. For patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven OPSCC, it is important to note that primary surgery may provide comparable or even increased survival benefit. To date, there is no evidence for a clear advantage of primary CRT over primary surgery in this group. In these cases, a de-escalated treatment package may be the preferred option. Here, the application of radioimmunotherapy as well as a reduced radiation dose may minimize long-term treatment-related morbidities.

KW - English Abstract

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s00106-016-0147-5

DO - 10.1007/s00106-016-0147-5

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 26992383

VL - 64

SP - 221

EP - 226

JO - HNO

JF - HNO

SN - 0017-6192

IS - 4

ER -