Is the Munich dysphagia Test–Parkinson's disease (MDT-PD) a Valid screening tool for patients at risk for aspiration?
Standard
Is the Munich dysphagia Test–Parkinson's disease (MDT-PD) a Valid screening tool for patients at risk for aspiration? / Buhmann, Carsten; Flügel, Till; Bihler, Moritz; Gerloff, Christian; Nießen, Almut; Hidding, Ute; Nienstedt, Julie Cläre; Pflug, Christina.
in: PARKINSONISM RELAT D, Jahrgang 61, 04.2019, S. 138-143.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the Munich dysphagia Test–Parkinson's disease (MDT-PD) a Valid screening tool for patients at risk for aspiration?
AU - Buhmann, Carsten
AU - Flügel, Till
AU - Bihler, Moritz
AU - Gerloff, Christian
AU - Nießen, Almut
AU - Hidding, Ute
AU - Nienstedt, Julie Cläre
AU - Pflug, Christina
N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - BackgroundDysphagia is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and leads to pneumonia, malnutrition, and reduced quality of life. For detecting dysphagia-exposed PD patients, the Munich dysphagia test–Parkinson's disease (MDT-PD) is a patient self-reported tool that has been developed specifically for PD patients. The MDT-PD is available in both German and English. This study aimed to ascertain whether the MDT-PD can detect aspiration in PD patients and, therefore, serve as a suitable screening tool.MethodsIn a controlled, cross-sectional, observational study, a total of 119 PD outpatients were examined clinically and were evaluated by the MDT-PD and the one swallowing question (NMS-3) from the nonmotor symptom questionnaire for Parkinson's disease (NMSQuest). The results of the MDT-PD and the NMS-3 were compared to the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) rating defined by flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).Key resultsHalf of the patients with aspiration as determined using FEES were not detected by the MDT-PD and NMS-3 self-reported tools. The proportion of false positive patients was high with both tools. The sensitivity of the MDT-PD to detect patients who are at risk for aspiration is insufficient (0.37) and not superior to applying the dysphagia screening question from the NMSQuest (0.5).ConclusionThis study reveals that the MDT-PD is not suitable for detecting aspiration in PD patients and, therefore, cannot be considered as a screening tool for aspiration. However, at present, there is no alternative validated screening tool that can reliably detect aspiration in PD patients. A readjustment of the MDT-PD is urgently needed.
AB - BackgroundDysphagia is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and leads to pneumonia, malnutrition, and reduced quality of life. For detecting dysphagia-exposed PD patients, the Munich dysphagia test–Parkinson's disease (MDT-PD) is a patient self-reported tool that has been developed specifically for PD patients. The MDT-PD is available in both German and English. This study aimed to ascertain whether the MDT-PD can detect aspiration in PD patients and, therefore, serve as a suitable screening tool.MethodsIn a controlled, cross-sectional, observational study, a total of 119 PD outpatients were examined clinically and were evaluated by the MDT-PD and the one swallowing question (NMS-3) from the nonmotor symptom questionnaire for Parkinson's disease (NMSQuest). The results of the MDT-PD and the NMS-3 were compared to the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) rating defined by flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).Key resultsHalf of the patients with aspiration as determined using FEES were not detected by the MDT-PD and NMS-3 self-reported tools. The proportion of false positive patients was high with both tools. The sensitivity of the MDT-PD to detect patients who are at risk for aspiration is insufficient (0.37) and not superior to applying the dysphagia screening question from the NMSQuest (0.5).ConclusionThis study reveals that the MDT-PD is not suitable for detecting aspiration in PD patients and, therefore, cannot be considered as a screening tool for aspiration. However, at present, there is no alternative validated screening tool that can reliably detect aspiration in PD patients. A readjustment of the MDT-PD is urgently needed.
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.10.031
U2 - 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.10.031
DO - 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.10.031
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 30414724
VL - 61
SP - 138
EP - 143
JO - PARKINSONISM RELAT D
JF - PARKINSONISM RELAT D
SN - 1353-8020
ER -