Is proteomics of value in cardiovascular risk assessment?
Standard
Is proteomics of value in cardiovascular risk assessment? / Arnold, Natalie; Koenig, Wolfgang.
in: CURR OPIN LIPIDOL, Jahrgang 30, Nr. 6, 12.2019, S. 452-461.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Review › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Is proteomics of value in cardiovascular risk assessment?
AU - Arnold, Natalie
AU - Koenig, Wolfgang
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To briefly summarize recently published evidence in the field of cardiovascular proteomics, focusing on its ability to improve cardiovascular risk stratification and critically discussing still open and burning issues and future perspectives of proteomics research.RECENT FINDINGS: Several epidemiological studies have demonstrated an improvement in cardiovascular risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors by adding novel biomarkers, identified by both discovery and targeted proteomics. However, only a moderate improvement in risk discrimination over clinical variables was observed. Moreover, despite different outcomes there was also a strong overlap of identified candidates, with several of them being already well established cardiovascular risk markers such as growth differentiation factor 15, natriuretic peptides, C-reactive protein, interleukins, and metalloproteases.SUMMARY: Although proteomics plays a crucial role in biomarker discovery, the modest discriminative ability of this technique raises the possibility that there are still hidden mechanisms in protein regulatory networks, which urgently need to be evaluated to improve a cardiovascular risk assessment to a clinically significant extent.
AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To briefly summarize recently published evidence in the field of cardiovascular proteomics, focusing on its ability to improve cardiovascular risk stratification and critically discussing still open and burning issues and future perspectives of proteomics research.RECENT FINDINGS: Several epidemiological studies have demonstrated an improvement in cardiovascular risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors by adding novel biomarkers, identified by both discovery and targeted proteomics. However, only a moderate improvement in risk discrimination over clinical variables was observed. Moreover, despite different outcomes there was also a strong overlap of identified candidates, with several of them being already well established cardiovascular risk markers such as growth differentiation factor 15, natriuretic peptides, C-reactive protein, interleukins, and metalloproteases.SUMMARY: Although proteomics plays a crucial role in biomarker discovery, the modest discriminative ability of this technique raises the possibility that there are still hidden mechanisms in protein regulatory networks, which urgently need to be evaluated to improve a cardiovascular risk assessment to a clinically significant extent.
KW - Animals
KW - Biomarkers/metabolism
KW - C-Reactive Protein/metabolism
KW - Cardiovascular Diseases/metabolism
KW - Growth Differentiation Factor 15/metabolism
KW - Humans
KW - Interleukins/metabolism
KW - Metalloproteases/metabolism
KW - Natriuretic Peptides/metabolism
KW - Proteomics
KW - Risk Assessment
KW - Risk Factors
U2 - 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000639
DO - 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000639
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 31577609
VL - 30
SP - 452
EP - 461
JO - CURR OPIN LIPIDOL
JF - CURR OPIN LIPIDOL
SN - 0957-9672
IS - 6
ER -