Is postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy suitable after a cardio- or cerebrovascular event?
Standard
Is postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy suitable after a cardio- or cerebrovascular event? / Windler, Eberhard; Stute, Petra; Ortmann, Olaf; Mueck, Alfred O.
in: ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET, Jahrgang 291, Nr. 1, 01.2015, S. 213-217.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Is postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy suitable after a cardio- or cerebrovascular event?
AU - Windler, Eberhard
AU - Stute, Petra
AU - Ortmann, Olaf
AU - Mueck, Alfred O
PY - 2015/1
Y1 - 2015/1
N2 - PURPOSE: Vascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. One-third of acute events affect women below age 60, when the prevalence of menopausal symptoms is high. This raises the question if hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may be an appropriate treatment for individual women although vascular disease is generally considered a contraindication.METHODS: Selective literature search was used for this study.RESULTS: In healthy women, HRT increases risks for venous thromboembolism and ischemic stroke, but for cardiovascular disease apparently only beyond 10 years after menopause or 60 years of age. Limited data in women with cardio or cerebrovascular disease have not demonstrated an increased risk for a vascular recurrent event, but for the first year after initiation. In HRT users affected by a cardiovascular event continuation of HRT has not been found to be associated with adverse outcome. Low dose estradiol--preferentially as transdermal patches, if necessary combined with metabolically neutral progestins--appears to convey lower risk.CONCLUSIONS: Safety data on HRT in survivors of cardiovascular events or ischemic stroke are limited, but exceptionally increased risk appears to be excluded. If off-label use of HRT is considered to be initiated or continued in women with cardio- or cerebrovascular disease, extensive counseling on the pros and cons of HRT is mandatory.
AB - PURPOSE: Vascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. One-third of acute events affect women below age 60, when the prevalence of menopausal symptoms is high. This raises the question if hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may be an appropriate treatment for individual women although vascular disease is generally considered a contraindication.METHODS: Selective literature search was used for this study.RESULTS: In healthy women, HRT increases risks for venous thromboembolism and ischemic stroke, but for cardiovascular disease apparently only beyond 10 years after menopause or 60 years of age. Limited data in women with cardio or cerebrovascular disease have not demonstrated an increased risk for a vascular recurrent event, but for the first year after initiation. In HRT users affected by a cardiovascular event continuation of HRT has not been found to be associated with adverse outcome. Low dose estradiol--preferentially as transdermal patches, if necessary combined with metabolically neutral progestins--appears to convey lower risk.CONCLUSIONS: Safety data on HRT in survivors of cardiovascular events or ischemic stroke are limited, but exceptionally increased risk appears to be excluded. If off-label use of HRT is considered to be initiated or continued in women with cardio- or cerebrovascular disease, extensive counseling on the pros and cons of HRT is mandatory.
KW - Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology
KW - Estradiol/administration & dosage
KW - Estrogen Replacement Therapy/adverse effects
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Postmenopause
KW - Progestins/administration & dosage
KW - Risk
KW - Stroke/epidemiology
KW - Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology
U2 - 10.1007/s00404-014-3485-0
DO - 10.1007/s00404-014-3485-0
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 25322975
VL - 291
SP - 213
EP - 217
JO - ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET
JF - ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET
SN - 0932-0067
IS - 1
ER -