Intravitreal 5-Fluorouracil and Heparin to Prevent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

Standard

Intravitreal 5-Fluorouracil and Heparin to Prevent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy : Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. / Schaub, Friederike; Schiller, Petra; Hoerster, Robert; Kraus, Daria; Holz, Frank G; Guthoff, Rainer; Agostini, Hansjürgen; Spitzer, Martin S; Wiedemann, Peter; Lommatzsch, Albrecht; Boden, Karl T; Dimopoulos, Spyridon; Bemme, Sebastian; Tamm, Svenja; Maier, Mathias; Roider, Johann; Enders, Philip; Altay, Lebriz; Fauser, Sascha; Kirchhof, Bernd; PRIVENT Study Group.

in: OPHTHALMOLOGY, Jahrgang 129, Nr. 10, 10.2022, S. 1129-1141.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Schaub, F, Schiller, P, Hoerster, R, Kraus, D, Holz, FG, Guthoff, R, Agostini, H, Spitzer, MS, Wiedemann, P, Lommatzsch, A, Boden, KT, Dimopoulos, S, Bemme, S, Tamm, S, Maier, M, Roider, J, Enders, P, Altay, L, Fauser, S, Kirchhof, B & PRIVENT Study Group 2022, 'Intravitreal 5-Fluorouracil and Heparin to Prevent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial', OPHTHALMOLOGY, Jg. 129, Nr. 10, S. 1129-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.05.024

APA

Schaub, F., Schiller, P., Hoerster, R., Kraus, D., Holz, F. G., Guthoff, R., Agostini, H., Spitzer, M. S., Wiedemann, P., Lommatzsch, A., Boden, K. T., Dimopoulos, S., Bemme, S., Tamm, S., Maier, M., Roider, J., Enders, P., Altay, L., Fauser, S., ... PRIVENT Study Group (2022). Intravitreal 5-Fluorouracil and Heparin to Prevent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 129(10), 1129-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.05.024

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{df963598c5e24079bfd53617aab9d321,
title = "Intravitreal 5-Fluorouracil and Heparin to Prevent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the major cause for surgical failure after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). So far, no therapy has been proven to prevent PVR. Promising results for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk eyes have been reported previously. The objective of this trial was to examine the effect of adjuvant intravitreal therapy with 5-FU and LMWH compared with placebo on incidence of PVR in high-risk patients with primary RRD.DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter, interventional trial with 1 interim analysis.PARTICIPANTS: Patients with RRD who were considered to be at high risk for PVR were included. Risk of PVR was assessed by noninvasive aqueous flare measurement using laser flare photometry.METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to verum (200 mg/ml 5-FU and 5 IU/ml dalteparin) and placebo (balanced salt solution) intravitreally applied during routine pars plana vitrectomy.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was the development of PVR grade CP (full-thickness retinal folds or subretinal strands in clock hours located posterior to equator) 1 or higher within 12 weeks after surgery. For grading, an end point committee assessed fundus photographs. Secondary end points included best-corrected visual acuity and redetachment rate. A group sequential design with 1 interim analysis was applied using the O'Brien and Fleming boundaries. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade CP incidence was compared using a Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by surgeon.RESULTS: A total of 325 patients in 13 German trial sites had been randomized (verum, n = 163; placebo, n = 162). In study eyes, mean laser flare was 31 ± 26 pc/ms. No significant difference was found in PVR rate. Primary analysis in the modified intention-to-treat population results were: verum 28% vs. placebo 23% (including not assessable cases as failures); odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-2.08; P = 0.77. Those in the per-protocol population were: 12% vs. 12%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.47-2.34; P = 0.47. None of the secondary end points showed any significant difference between treatment groups. During the study period, no relevant safety risks were identified.CONCLUSIONS: Rate of PVR did not differ between adjuvant therapy with 5-FU and LMWH and placebo treatment in eyes with RRD.",
keywords = "Dalteparin/therapeutic use, Double-Blind Method, Fluorouracil, Heparin/therapeutic use, Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use, Humans, Retinal Detachment/surgery, Vitrectomy/adverse effects, Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative/drug therapy",
author = "Friederike Schaub and Petra Schiller and Robert Hoerster and Daria Kraus and Holz, {Frank G} and Rainer Guthoff and Hansj{\"u}rgen Agostini and Spitzer, {Martin S} and Peter Wiedemann and Albrecht Lommatzsch and Boden, {Karl T} and Spyridon Dimopoulos and Sebastian Bemme and Svenja Tamm and Mathias Maier and Johann Roider and Philip Enders and Lebriz Altay and Sascha Fauser and Bernd Kirchhof and {PRIVENT Study Group}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.05.024",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "1129--1141",
journal = "OPHTHALMOLOGY",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intravitreal 5-Fluorouracil and Heparin to Prevent Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

T2 - Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial

AU - Schaub, Friederike

AU - Schiller, Petra

AU - Hoerster, Robert

AU - Kraus, Daria

AU - Holz, Frank G

AU - Guthoff, Rainer

AU - Agostini, Hansjürgen

AU - Spitzer, Martin S

AU - Wiedemann, Peter

AU - Lommatzsch, Albrecht

AU - Boden, Karl T

AU - Dimopoulos, Spyridon

AU - Bemme, Sebastian

AU - Tamm, Svenja

AU - Maier, Mathias

AU - Roider, Johann

AU - Enders, Philip

AU - Altay, Lebriz

AU - Fauser, Sascha

AU - Kirchhof, Bernd

AU - PRIVENT Study Group

N1 - Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/10

Y1 - 2022/10

N2 - PURPOSE: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the major cause for surgical failure after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). So far, no therapy has been proven to prevent PVR. Promising results for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk eyes have been reported previously. The objective of this trial was to examine the effect of adjuvant intravitreal therapy with 5-FU and LMWH compared with placebo on incidence of PVR in high-risk patients with primary RRD.DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter, interventional trial with 1 interim analysis.PARTICIPANTS: Patients with RRD who were considered to be at high risk for PVR were included. Risk of PVR was assessed by noninvasive aqueous flare measurement using laser flare photometry.METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to verum (200 mg/ml 5-FU and 5 IU/ml dalteparin) and placebo (balanced salt solution) intravitreally applied during routine pars plana vitrectomy.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was the development of PVR grade CP (full-thickness retinal folds or subretinal strands in clock hours located posterior to equator) 1 or higher within 12 weeks after surgery. For grading, an end point committee assessed fundus photographs. Secondary end points included best-corrected visual acuity and redetachment rate. A group sequential design with 1 interim analysis was applied using the O'Brien and Fleming boundaries. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade CP incidence was compared using a Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by surgeon.RESULTS: A total of 325 patients in 13 German trial sites had been randomized (verum, n = 163; placebo, n = 162). In study eyes, mean laser flare was 31 ± 26 pc/ms. No significant difference was found in PVR rate. Primary analysis in the modified intention-to-treat population results were: verum 28% vs. placebo 23% (including not assessable cases as failures); odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-2.08; P = 0.77. Those in the per-protocol population were: 12% vs. 12%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.47-2.34; P = 0.47. None of the secondary end points showed any significant difference between treatment groups. During the study period, no relevant safety risks were identified.CONCLUSIONS: Rate of PVR did not differ between adjuvant therapy with 5-FU and LMWH and placebo treatment in eyes with RRD.

AB - PURPOSE: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the major cause for surgical failure after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). So far, no therapy has been proven to prevent PVR. Promising results for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk eyes have been reported previously. The objective of this trial was to examine the effect of adjuvant intravitreal therapy with 5-FU and LMWH compared with placebo on incidence of PVR in high-risk patients with primary RRD.DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter, interventional trial with 1 interim analysis.PARTICIPANTS: Patients with RRD who were considered to be at high risk for PVR were included. Risk of PVR was assessed by noninvasive aqueous flare measurement using laser flare photometry.METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to verum (200 mg/ml 5-FU and 5 IU/ml dalteparin) and placebo (balanced salt solution) intravitreally applied during routine pars plana vitrectomy.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was the development of PVR grade CP (full-thickness retinal folds or subretinal strands in clock hours located posterior to equator) 1 or higher within 12 weeks after surgery. For grading, an end point committee assessed fundus photographs. Secondary end points included best-corrected visual acuity and redetachment rate. A group sequential design with 1 interim analysis was applied using the O'Brien and Fleming boundaries. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade CP incidence was compared using a Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by surgeon.RESULTS: A total of 325 patients in 13 German trial sites had been randomized (verum, n = 163; placebo, n = 162). In study eyes, mean laser flare was 31 ± 26 pc/ms. No significant difference was found in PVR rate. Primary analysis in the modified intention-to-treat population results were: verum 28% vs. placebo 23% (including not assessable cases as failures); odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-2.08; P = 0.77. Those in the per-protocol population were: 12% vs. 12%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.47-2.34; P = 0.47. None of the secondary end points showed any significant difference between treatment groups. During the study period, no relevant safety risks were identified.CONCLUSIONS: Rate of PVR did not differ between adjuvant therapy with 5-FU and LMWH and placebo treatment in eyes with RRD.

KW - Dalteparin/therapeutic use

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Fluorouracil

KW - Heparin/therapeutic use

KW - Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use

KW - Humans

KW - Retinal Detachment/surgery

KW - Vitrectomy/adverse effects

KW - Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative/drug therapy

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.05.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.05.024

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35680097

VL - 129

SP - 1129

EP - 1141

JO - OPHTHALMOLOGY

JF - OPHTHALMOLOGY

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 10

ER -