Intraperitoneal treatment with the trifunctional bispecific antibody Catumaxomab in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase IIa study of the AGO Study Group
Standard
Intraperitoneal treatment with the trifunctional bispecific antibody Catumaxomab in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase IIa study of the AGO Study Group. / Baumann, K; Pfisterer, J; Wimberger, P; Burchardi, N; Kurzeder, C; du Bois, A; Loibl, S; Sehouli, J; Huober, J; Schmalfeldt, B; Vergote, I; Lück, H J; Wagner, U.
in: GYNECOL ONCOL, Jahrgang 123, Nr. 1, 10.2011, S. 27-32.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraperitoneal treatment with the trifunctional bispecific antibody Catumaxomab in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase IIa study of the AGO Study Group
AU - Baumann, K
AU - Pfisterer, J
AU - Wimberger, P
AU - Burchardi, N
AU - Kurzeder, C
AU - du Bois, A
AU - Loibl, S
AU - Sehouli, J
AU - Huober, J
AU - Schmalfeldt, B
AU - Vergote, I
AU - Lück, H J
AU - Wagner, U
N1 - Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to select the best catumaxomab regimen for further investigation in ovarian cancer based on confirmed tumour response.METHODS: Randomised open-label phase IIa study in women with platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Catumaxomab (6-hour intraperitoneal infusion on days 0, 3, 7 and 10) was administered at a low (10, 10, 10 and 10 μg) or high dose (10, 20, 50 and 100 μg). Responders were patients with either a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response.RESULTS: Forty-five patients were randomised to receive either low dose (23) or high dose (22). There were no responders in the low-dose versus one patient (5%) in the high-dose group with a PR. In the low-dose group, two patients (9%) had stable disease compared with five patients (23%) in the high-dose group. Catumaxomab was well tolerated and there was no difference between the dose groups in the incidence of treatment-induced adverse events, the most common of which were gastrointestinal and injection-site reactions.CONCLUSION: Catumaxomab had modest activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The high-dose regimen was associated with a slightly better therapeutic index than the low dose regimen.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to select the best catumaxomab regimen for further investigation in ovarian cancer based on confirmed tumour response.METHODS: Randomised open-label phase IIa study in women with platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Catumaxomab (6-hour intraperitoneal infusion on days 0, 3, 7 and 10) was administered at a low (10, 10, 10 and 10 μg) or high dose (10, 20, 50 and 100 μg). Responders were patients with either a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response.RESULTS: Forty-five patients were randomised to receive either low dose (23) or high dose (22). There were no responders in the low-dose versus one patient (5%) in the high-dose group with a PR. In the low-dose group, two patients (9%) had stable disease compared with five patients (23%) in the high-dose group. Catumaxomab was well tolerated and there was no difference between the dose groups in the incidence of treatment-induced adverse events, the most common of which were gastrointestinal and injection-site reactions.CONCLUSION: Catumaxomab had modest activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The high-dose regimen was associated with a slightly better therapeutic index than the low dose regimen.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Antibodies, Bispecific
KW - Disease-Free Survival
KW - Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
KW - Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Infusions, Parenteral
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
KW - Organoplatinum Compounds
KW - Ovarian Neoplasms
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.004
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 21733566
VL - 123
SP - 27
EP - 32
JO - GYNECOL ONCOL
JF - GYNECOL ONCOL
SN - 0090-8258
IS - 1
ER -