Interrater-Reliabilität der kriteriengeleiteten Beurteilung der Schuldfähigkeit bei paraphilen Störungen
Standard
Interrater-Reliabilität der kriteriengeleiteten Beurteilung der Schuldfähigkeit bei paraphilen Störungen. / Dobbrunz, Sascha; Briken, Peer; Mueller, Juergen; Brunner, Franziska.
in: NERVENARZT, Jahrgang 92, Nr. 1, 01.2021, S. 1-8.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Interrater-Reliabilität der kriteriengeleiteten Beurteilung der Schuldfähigkeit bei paraphilen Störungen
AU - Dobbrunz, Sascha
AU - Briken, Peer
AU - Mueller, Juergen
AU - Brunner, Franziska
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: For the assessment of criminal responsibility in the context of sexual delinquency, the evaluation of the severity of a paraphilic disorder and the ability to be controlled are of particular importance. Established assessment criteria are insufficiently operationalized.AIM AND METHODS: The existing criteria were tested by experts of various professional groups with respect to the reliability. For this purpose, 14 experts assessed the criteria of 2 different sets of criteria based on 2 case vignettes (see electronic supplementary material).RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The interrater reliability (IRR) with reference to the criteria of Briken and Müller was higher than the previously established criteria of Boetticher et al. The evaluation of the subjective importance of the criteria of both assessment scales showed that all criteria were rated as at least of average importance. It could thus be useful to initially include both sets of criteria for a greater transparency in the assessment process and to investigate this procedure in further studies.
AB - BACKGROUND: For the assessment of criminal responsibility in the context of sexual delinquency, the evaluation of the severity of a paraphilic disorder and the ability to be controlled are of particular importance. Established assessment criteria are insufficiently operationalized.AIM AND METHODS: The existing criteria were tested by experts of various professional groups with respect to the reliability. For this purpose, 14 experts assessed the criteria of 2 different sets of criteria based on 2 case vignettes (see electronic supplementary material).RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The interrater reliability (IRR) with reference to the criteria of Briken and Müller was higher than the previously established criteria of Boetticher et al. The evaluation of the subjective importance of the criteria of both assessment scales showed that all criteria were rated as at least of average importance. It could thus be useful to initially include both sets of criteria for a greater transparency in the assessment process and to investigate this procedure in further studies.
KW - Criminals
KW - Humans
KW - Paraphilic Disorders/diagnosis
KW - Reproducibility of Results
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-020-00920-1
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-020-00920-1
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
C2 - 32394005
VL - 92
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - NERVENARZT
JF - NERVENARZT
SN - 0028-2804
IS - 1
ER -