Internet-based self-help for psychosis: Findings from a randomized controlled trial

Standard

Internet-based self-help for psychosis: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. / Westermann, Stefan; Rüegg, Nina; Lüdtke, Thies; Moritz, Steffen; Berger, Thomas.

in: J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, Jahrgang 88, Nr. 10, 10.2020, S. 937-950.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1e1ecccad9c149d1a6eeab68096fa50a,
title = "Internet-based self-help for psychosis: Findings from a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for psychosis is recommended in many national guidelines, but dissemination into routine health care remains poor. This study tests whether an 8-week, CBT-oriented, Internet-based intervention (IBI) for people with psychosis is feasible, effective, and safe compared to care as usual.METHOD: A sample of 101 people diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (age: M = 40.0, SD = 9.60; sex: 58% female) was randomly assigned to either an IBI for psychosis or a wait-list control condition. The primary outcome was a composite score of the positive factor of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Launay Slade Hallucination Scale, and the paranoia checklist (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02974400).RESULTS: The composite score of psychotic symptom severity decreased more in the IBI condition than in the wait-list condition, reflected in the significant interaction of Time × Condition, F(1, 87.28) = 4.04, p = .047, dbetween = 0.24, 95% CI [-0.15, 0.63]. In the combined sample of participants who received immediate or delayed access to the intervention, the outcome improved further during the 6-month follow up period with a significant main effect of time, F(1, 69.35) = 9.59, p = .003, d = -0.37, 95% CI [-0.66, -0.07]. Participants were satisfied with the intervention (89%), and many used the intervention as defined per protocol (52%; at least four completed modules). Adverse events were infrequent (4.9%).CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based, CBT-oriented interventions provide an add-on effect to care as usual and have the potential to narrow the psychological treatment gap in psychosis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).",
author = "Stefan Westermann and Nina R{\"u}egg and Thies L{\"u}dtke and Steffen Moritz and Thomas Berger",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1037/ccp0000602",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "937--950",
journal = "J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internet-based self-help for psychosis: Findings from a randomized controlled trial

AU - Westermann, Stefan

AU - Rüegg, Nina

AU - Lüdtke, Thies

AU - Moritz, Steffen

AU - Berger, Thomas

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for psychosis is recommended in many national guidelines, but dissemination into routine health care remains poor. This study tests whether an 8-week, CBT-oriented, Internet-based intervention (IBI) for people with psychosis is feasible, effective, and safe compared to care as usual.METHOD: A sample of 101 people diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (age: M = 40.0, SD = 9.60; sex: 58% female) was randomly assigned to either an IBI for psychosis or a wait-list control condition. The primary outcome was a composite score of the positive factor of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Launay Slade Hallucination Scale, and the paranoia checklist (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02974400).RESULTS: The composite score of psychotic symptom severity decreased more in the IBI condition than in the wait-list condition, reflected in the significant interaction of Time × Condition, F(1, 87.28) = 4.04, p = .047, dbetween = 0.24, 95% CI [-0.15, 0.63]. In the combined sample of participants who received immediate or delayed access to the intervention, the outcome improved further during the 6-month follow up period with a significant main effect of time, F(1, 69.35) = 9.59, p = .003, d = -0.37, 95% CI [-0.66, -0.07]. Participants were satisfied with the intervention (89%), and many used the intervention as defined per protocol (52%; at least four completed modules). Adverse events were infrequent (4.9%).CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based, CBT-oriented interventions provide an add-on effect to care as usual and have the potential to narrow the psychological treatment gap in psychosis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for psychosis is recommended in many national guidelines, but dissemination into routine health care remains poor. This study tests whether an 8-week, CBT-oriented, Internet-based intervention (IBI) for people with psychosis is feasible, effective, and safe compared to care as usual.METHOD: A sample of 101 people diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (age: M = 40.0, SD = 9.60; sex: 58% female) was randomly assigned to either an IBI for psychosis or a wait-list control condition. The primary outcome was a composite score of the positive factor of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Launay Slade Hallucination Scale, and the paranoia checklist (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02974400).RESULTS: The composite score of psychotic symptom severity decreased more in the IBI condition than in the wait-list condition, reflected in the significant interaction of Time × Condition, F(1, 87.28) = 4.04, p = .047, dbetween = 0.24, 95% CI [-0.15, 0.63]. In the combined sample of participants who received immediate or delayed access to the intervention, the outcome improved further during the 6-month follow up period with a significant main effect of time, F(1, 69.35) = 9.59, p = .003, d = -0.37, 95% CI [-0.66, -0.07]. Participants were satisfied with the intervention (89%), and many used the intervention as defined per protocol (52%; at least four completed modules). Adverse events were infrequent (4.9%).CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based, CBT-oriented interventions provide an add-on effect to care as usual and have the potential to narrow the psychological treatment gap in psychosis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

U2 - 10.1037/ccp0000602

DO - 10.1037/ccp0000602

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32790453

VL - 88

SP - 937

EP - 950

JO - J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH

JF - J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 10

ER -