Interaction of Instrumental and Goal-Directed Learning Modulates Prediction Error Representations in the Ventral Striatum

Standard

Interaction of Instrumental and Goal-Directed Learning Modulates Prediction Error Representations in the Ventral Striatum. / Guo, Rong; Böhmer, Wendelin; Hebart, Martin; Chien, Samson; Sommer-Blöchl, Tobias; Obermayer, Klaus; Gläscher, Jan.

in: J NEUROSCI, Jahrgang 36, Nr. 50, 14.12.2016, S. 12650-12660.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{cade34f8ca96481598214a2159510912,
title = "Interaction of Instrumental and Goal-Directed Learning Modulates Prediction Error Representations in the Ventral Striatum",
abstract = "Goal-directed and instrumental learning are both important controllers of human behavior. Learning about which stimulus event occurs in the environment and the reward associated with them allows humans to seek out the most valuable stimulus and move through the environment in a goal-directed manner. Stimulus-response associations are characteristic of instrumental learning, whereas response-outcome associations are the hallmark of goal-directed learning. Here we provide behavioral, computational, and neuroimaging results from a novel task in which stimulus-response and response-outcome associations are learned simultaneously but dominate behavior at different stages of the experiment. We found that prediction error representations in the ventral striatum depend on which type of learning dominates. Furthermore, the amygdala tracks the time-dependent weighting of stimulus-response versus response-outcome learning. Our findings suggest that the goal-directed and instrumental controllers dynamically engage the ventral striatum in representing prediction errors whenever one of them is dominating choice behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Converging evidence in human neuroimaging studies has shown that the reward prediction errors are correlated with activity in the ventral striatum. Our results demonstrate that this region is simultaneously correlated with a stimulus prediction error. Furthermore, the learning system that is currently dominating behavioral choice dynamically engages the ventral striatum for computing its prediction errors. This demonstrates that the prediction error representations are highly dynamic and influenced by various experimental context. This finding points to a general role of the ventral striatum in detecting expectancy violations and encoding error signals regardless of the specific nature of the reinforcer itself.",
author = "Rong Guo and Wendelin B{\"o}hmer and Martin Hebart and Samson Chien and Tobias Sommer-Bl{\"o}chl and Klaus Obermayer and Jan Gl{\"a}scher",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/3612650-11$15.00/0.",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1677-16.2016",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "12650--12660",
journal = "J NEUROSCI",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "50",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction of Instrumental and Goal-Directed Learning Modulates Prediction Error Representations in the Ventral Striatum

AU - Guo, Rong

AU - Böhmer, Wendelin

AU - Hebart, Martin

AU - Chien, Samson

AU - Sommer-Blöchl, Tobias

AU - Obermayer, Klaus

AU - Gläscher, Jan

N1 - Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/3612650-11$15.00/0.

PY - 2016/12/14

Y1 - 2016/12/14

N2 - Goal-directed and instrumental learning are both important controllers of human behavior. Learning about which stimulus event occurs in the environment and the reward associated with them allows humans to seek out the most valuable stimulus and move through the environment in a goal-directed manner. Stimulus-response associations are characteristic of instrumental learning, whereas response-outcome associations are the hallmark of goal-directed learning. Here we provide behavioral, computational, and neuroimaging results from a novel task in which stimulus-response and response-outcome associations are learned simultaneously but dominate behavior at different stages of the experiment. We found that prediction error representations in the ventral striatum depend on which type of learning dominates. Furthermore, the amygdala tracks the time-dependent weighting of stimulus-response versus response-outcome learning. Our findings suggest that the goal-directed and instrumental controllers dynamically engage the ventral striatum in representing prediction errors whenever one of them is dominating choice behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Converging evidence in human neuroimaging studies has shown that the reward prediction errors are correlated with activity in the ventral striatum. Our results demonstrate that this region is simultaneously correlated with a stimulus prediction error. Furthermore, the learning system that is currently dominating behavioral choice dynamically engages the ventral striatum for computing its prediction errors. This demonstrates that the prediction error representations are highly dynamic and influenced by various experimental context. This finding points to a general role of the ventral striatum in detecting expectancy violations and encoding error signals regardless of the specific nature of the reinforcer itself.

AB - Goal-directed and instrumental learning are both important controllers of human behavior. Learning about which stimulus event occurs in the environment and the reward associated with them allows humans to seek out the most valuable stimulus and move through the environment in a goal-directed manner. Stimulus-response associations are characteristic of instrumental learning, whereas response-outcome associations are the hallmark of goal-directed learning. Here we provide behavioral, computational, and neuroimaging results from a novel task in which stimulus-response and response-outcome associations are learned simultaneously but dominate behavior at different stages of the experiment. We found that prediction error representations in the ventral striatum depend on which type of learning dominates. Furthermore, the amygdala tracks the time-dependent weighting of stimulus-response versus response-outcome learning. Our findings suggest that the goal-directed and instrumental controllers dynamically engage the ventral striatum in representing prediction errors whenever one of them is dominating choice behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Converging evidence in human neuroimaging studies has shown that the reward prediction errors are correlated with activity in the ventral striatum. Our results demonstrate that this region is simultaneously correlated with a stimulus prediction error. Furthermore, the learning system that is currently dominating behavioral choice dynamically engages the ventral striatum for computing its prediction errors. This demonstrates that the prediction error representations are highly dynamic and influenced by various experimental context. This finding points to a general role of the ventral striatum in detecting expectancy violations and encoding error signals regardless of the specific nature of the reinforcer itself.

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1677-16.2016

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1677-16.2016

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27974615

VL - 36

SP - 12650

EP - 12660

JO - J NEUROSCI

JF - J NEUROSCI

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 50

ER -