PortalPublikationenInfluence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker po...

Influence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker position, and trial sequence in a saccadic eye movement task

Standard

Influence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker position, and trial sequence in a saccadic eye movement task. / Peschke, Claudia; Hilgetag, Claus-Christian; Olk, Bettina.

in: Q J EXP PSYCHOL, Jahrgang 66, Nr. 11, 01.01.2013, S. 2253-67.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Peschke, C, Hilgetag, C-C & Olk, B 2013, 'Influence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker position, and trial sequence in a saccadic eye movement task', Q J EXP PSYCHOL, Jg. 66, Nr. 11, S. 2253-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.777464

APA

Peschke, C., Hilgetag, C-C., & Olk, B. (2013). Influence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker position, and trial sequence in a saccadic eye movement task. Q J EXP PSYCHOL, 66(11), 2253-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.777464

Vancouver

Peschke C, Hilgetag C-C, Olk B. Influence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker position, and trial sequence in a saccadic eye movement task. Q J EXP PSYCHOL. 2013 Jan 1;66(11):2253-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.777464

Bibtex

@article{9def54196c0e44b49194f7bfbb75ed69,
title = "Influence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker position, and trial sequence in a saccadic eye movement task",
abstract = "Using the flanker paradigm in a task requiring eye movement responses, we examined how stimulus type (arrows vs. letters) modulated effects of flanker and flanker position. Further, we examined trial sequence effects and the impact of stimulus type on these effects. Participants responded to a central target with a left- or rightward saccade. We reasoned that arrows, being overlearned symbols of direction, are processed with less effort and are therefore linked more easily to a direction and a required response than are letters. The main findings demonstrate that (a) flanker effects were stronger for arrows than for letters, (b) flanker position more strongly modulated the flanker effect for letters than for arrows, and (c) trial sequence effects partly differed between the two stimulus types. We discuss these findings in the context of a more automatic and effortless processing of arrow relative to letter stimuli.",
keywords = "Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Functional Laterality, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Saccades, Visual Perception, Vocabulary, Young Adult",
author = "Claudia Peschke and Claus-Christian Hilgetag and Bettina Olk",
year = "2013",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2013.777464",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "2253--67",
journal = "Q J EXP PSYCHOL",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker position, and trial sequence in a saccadic eye movement task

AU - Peschke, Claudia

AU - Hilgetag, Claus-Christian

AU - Olk, Bettina

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Using the flanker paradigm in a task requiring eye movement responses, we examined how stimulus type (arrows vs. letters) modulated effects of flanker and flanker position. Further, we examined trial sequence effects and the impact of stimulus type on these effects. Participants responded to a central target with a left- or rightward saccade. We reasoned that arrows, being overlearned symbols of direction, are processed with less effort and are therefore linked more easily to a direction and a required response than are letters. The main findings demonstrate that (a) flanker effects were stronger for arrows than for letters, (b) flanker position more strongly modulated the flanker effect for letters than for arrows, and (c) trial sequence effects partly differed between the two stimulus types. We discuss these findings in the context of a more automatic and effortless processing of arrow relative to letter stimuli.

AB - Using the flanker paradigm in a task requiring eye movement responses, we examined how stimulus type (arrows vs. letters) modulated effects of flanker and flanker position. Further, we examined trial sequence effects and the impact of stimulus type on these effects. Participants responded to a central target with a left- or rightward saccade. We reasoned that arrows, being overlearned symbols of direction, are processed with less effort and are therefore linked more easily to a direction and a required response than are letters. The main findings demonstrate that (a) flanker effects were stronger for arrows than for letters, (b) flanker position more strongly modulated the flanker effect for letters than for arrows, and (c) trial sequence effects partly differed between the two stimulus types. We discuss these findings in the context of a more automatic and effortless processing of arrow relative to letter stimuli.

KW - Adult

KW - Analysis of Variance

KW - Female

KW - Functional Laterality

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Photic Stimulation

KW - Reaction Time

KW - Saccades

KW - Visual Perception

KW - Vocabulary

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2013.777464

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2013.777464

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23565974

VL - 66

SP - 2253

EP - 2267

JO - Q J EXP PSYCHOL

JF - Q J EXP PSYCHOL

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 11

ER -