Infection following fractures of the proximal tibia - a systematic review of incidence and outcome

Standard

Infection following fractures of the proximal tibia - a systematic review of incidence and outcome. / Henkelmann, Ralf; Frosch, Karl-Heinz; Glaab, Richard; Lill, Helmut; Schoepp, Christian; Seybold, Dominik; Josten, Christoph; Hepp, Pierre; Committee TRAUMA of the AGA-Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery.

in: BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 1, 21.11.2017, S. 481.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

Henkelmann, R, Frosch, K-H, Glaab, R, Lill, H, Schoepp, C, Seybold, D, Josten, C, Hepp, P & Committee TRAUMA of the AGA-Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery 2017, 'Infection following fractures of the proximal tibia - a systematic review of incidence and outcome', BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, Jg. 18, Nr. 1, S. 481. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1847-z

APA

Henkelmann, R., Frosch, K-H., Glaab, R., Lill, H., Schoepp, C., Seybold, D., Josten, C., Hepp, P., & Committee TRAUMA of the AGA-Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery (2017). Infection following fractures of the proximal tibia - a systematic review of incidence and outcome. BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS, 18(1), 481. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1847-z

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{dbe55f44949b49de9b4284e4ff6a402d,
title = "Infection following fractures of the proximal tibia - a systematic review of incidence and outcome",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: To systematically review all available studies of operatively treated proximal tibia fractures and to report the incidence of superficial or deep infection and subsequent outcomes.METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in Medline, Cochrane, Embase and GoogleScholar was conducted to identify studies with cohorts of patients with infection after surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures. Studies were included according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were analysed for methodological deficiencies and quality of outcome reporting based on the Level of Evidence (LOE) and Coleman Methodology Scoring (CMS.) RESULTS: In total 32 studies were included. There was heterogeneity between the studies, in terms of subject of the studies, outcome criteria, fracture type and classification, surgical techniques and length of follow-up. Therefore, no meta-analysis could be performed. The average CMS was 54.2 (range 36-75). The included studies were 25 case series (LOE IV), 6 were prospective cohort studies (LOE III) and one was a prospective randomized trial (LOE I). 203 (12.3%, range: 2.6-45.0%) infections occurred in the overall population (n = 2063). Those were divided into 129 deep infections and 74 superficial infections. Revision due to infection was reported in 29 studies, microbiological results in 6, respectively. 72 (55,8%) of 129 cases reporting outcome after deep infection had an unsatisfactory outcome with substantial limitations of the affected joint and leg.CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative infections are a challenge, sometimes requiring several revisions and often with a worse outcome. Further studies with structured study protocols should be performed for a better understanding of risk factors to improve treatment outcomes.",
keywords = "Fracture Fixation, Humans, Incidence, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Risk Factors, Surgical Wound Infection, Tibia, Tibial Fractures, Treatment Outcome, Journal Article, Review",
author = "Ralf Henkelmann and Karl-Heinz Frosch and Richard Glaab and Helmut Lill and Christian Schoepp and Dominik Seybold and Christoph Josten and Pierre Hepp and {Committee TRAUMA of the AGA-Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery}",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/s12891-017-1847-z",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "481",
journal = "BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infection following fractures of the proximal tibia - a systematic review of incidence and outcome

AU - Henkelmann, Ralf

AU - Frosch, Karl-Heinz

AU - Glaab, Richard

AU - Lill, Helmut

AU - Schoepp, Christian

AU - Seybold, Dominik

AU - Josten, Christoph

AU - Hepp, Pierre

AU - Committee TRAUMA of the AGA-Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery

PY - 2017/11/21

Y1 - 2017/11/21

N2 - BACKGROUND: To systematically review all available studies of operatively treated proximal tibia fractures and to report the incidence of superficial or deep infection and subsequent outcomes.METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in Medline, Cochrane, Embase and GoogleScholar was conducted to identify studies with cohorts of patients with infection after surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures. Studies were included according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were analysed for methodological deficiencies and quality of outcome reporting based on the Level of Evidence (LOE) and Coleman Methodology Scoring (CMS.) RESULTS: In total 32 studies were included. There was heterogeneity between the studies, in terms of subject of the studies, outcome criteria, fracture type and classification, surgical techniques and length of follow-up. Therefore, no meta-analysis could be performed. The average CMS was 54.2 (range 36-75). The included studies were 25 case series (LOE IV), 6 were prospective cohort studies (LOE III) and one was a prospective randomized trial (LOE I). 203 (12.3%, range: 2.6-45.0%) infections occurred in the overall population (n = 2063). Those were divided into 129 deep infections and 74 superficial infections. Revision due to infection was reported in 29 studies, microbiological results in 6, respectively. 72 (55,8%) of 129 cases reporting outcome after deep infection had an unsatisfactory outcome with substantial limitations of the affected joint and leg.CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative infections are a challenge, sometimes requiring several revisions and often with a worse outcome. Further studies with structured study protocols should be performed for a better understanding of risk factors to improve treatment outcomes.

AB - BACKGROUND: To systematically review all available studies of operatively treated proximal tibia fractures and to report the incidence of superficial or deep infection and subsequent outcomes.METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in Medline, Cochrane, Embase and GoogleScholar was conducted to identify studies with cohorts of patients with infection after surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures. Studies were included according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were analysed for methodological deficiencies and quality of outcome reporting based on the Level of Evidence (LOE) and Coleman Methodology Scoring (CMS.) RESULTS: In total 32 studies were included. There was heterogeneity between the studies, in terms of subject of the studies, outcome criteria, fracture type and classification, surgical techniques and length of follow-up. Therefore, no meta-analysis could be performed. The average CMS was 54.2 (range 36-75). The included studies were 25 case series (LOE IV), 6 were prospective cohort studies (LOE III) and one was a prospective randomized trial (LOE I). 203 (12.3%, range: 2.6-45.0%) infections occurred in the overall population (n = 2063). Those were divided into 129 deep infections and 74 superficial infections. Revision due to infection was reported in 29 studies, microbiological results in 6, respectively. 72 (55,8%) of 129 cases reporting outcome after deep infection had an unsatisfactory outcome with substantial limitations of the affected joint and leg.CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative infections are a challenge, sometimes requiring several revisions and often with a worse outcome. Further studies with structured study protocols should be performed for a better understanding of risk factors to improve treatment outcomes.

KW - Fracture Fixation

KW - Humans

KW - Incidence

KW - Postoperative Complications

KW - Reoperation

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Surgical Wound Infection

KW - Tibia

KW - Tibial Fractures

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1186/s12891-017-1847-z

DO - 10.1186/s12891-017-1847-z

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 29162084

VL - 18

SP - 481

JO - BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS

JF - BMC MUSCULOSKEL DIS

SN - 1471-2474

IS - 1

ER -