Incentives increased return rates but did not influence partial nonresponse or treatment outcome in a randomized trial.

Standard

Incentives increased return rates but did not influence partial nonresponse or treatment outcome in a randomized trial. / Dirmaier, Jörg; Harfst, Timo; Koch-Gromus, Uwe; Schulz, Holger.

in: J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, Jahrgang 60, Nr. 12, 12, 2007, S. 1263-1270.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f6d0dd4992b24f26a9565a9a768b6074,
title = "Incentives increased return rates but did not influence partial nonresponse or treatment outcome in a randomized trial.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze monetary incentives and shortening the questionnaire as means of increasing response rates in a mailed follow-up survey 1 year after inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment. Additionally, effects on partial nonresponse and the assessment of treatment outcome were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a 2x2 factorial design, a sample of 3,825 patients was randomized to the two following interventions: (1) receiving a prepaid monetary incentive or none; and (2) getting a short or a long questionnaire. Treatment outcome was measured prospectively by a self-assessment instrument for psychopathology. RESULTS: When using incentives, the response rate significantly increased by 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-11.9%). Receiving a short questionnaire led to an augmentation of the response rate of 3.7% (95% CI 0.9-8.3%), which was not significant. The corresponding odds ratios were significantly increased for monetary incentives (1.36; 95% CI 1.30-1.88), and when abridging the questionnaire (1.15; 95% CI 1.01-1.31). However, partial nonresponse and treatment outcome were independent of the two factors. CONCLUSION: Incentives and a shorter questionnaire led to higher return rates but did not affect partial nonresponse and self-report of treatment outcome in a randomized postal survey.",
author = "J{\"o}rg Dirmaier and Timo Harfst and Uwe Koch-Gromus and Holger Schulz",
year = "2007",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "60",
pages = "1263--1270",
journal = "J CLIN EPIDEMIOL",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incentives increased return rates but did not influence partial nonresponse or treatment outcome in a randomized trial.

AU - Dirmaier, Jörg

AU - Harfst, Timo

AU - Koch-Gromus, Uwe

AU - Schulz, Holger

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze monetary incentives and shortening the questionnaire as means of increasing response rates in a mailed follow-up survey 1 year after inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment. Additionally, effects on partial nonresponse and the assessment of treatment outcome were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a 2x2 factorial design, a sample of 3,825 patients was randomized to the two following interventions: (1) receiving a prepaid monetary incentive or none; and (2) getting a short or a long questionnaire. Treatment outcome was measured prospectively by a self-assessment instrument for psychopathology. RESULTS: When using incentives, the response rate significantly increased by 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-11.9%). Receiving a short questionnaire led to an augmentation of the response rate of 3.7% (95% CI 0.9-8.3%), which was not significant. The corresponding odds ratios were significantly increased for monetary incentives (1.36; 95% CI 1.30-1.88), and when abridging the questionnaire (1.15; 95% CI 1.01-1.31). However, partial nonresponse and treatment outcome were independent of the two factors. CONCLUSION: Incentives and a shorter questionnaire led to higher return rates but did not affect partial nonresponse and self-report of treatment outcome in a randomized postal survey.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze monetary incentives and shortening the questionnaire as means of increasing response rates in a mailed follow-up survey 1 year after inpatient psychotherapeutic treatment. Additionally, effects on partial nonresponse and the assessment of treatment outcome were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In a 2x2 factorial design, a sample of 3,825 patients was randomized to the two following interventions: (1) receiving a prepaid monetary incentive or none; and (2) getting a short or a long questionnaire. Treatment outcome was measured prospectively by a self-assessment instrument for psychopathology. RESULTS: When using incentives, the response rate significantly increased by 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-11.9%). Receiving a short questionnaire led to an augmentation of the response rate of 3.7% (95% CI 0.9-8.3%), which was not significant. The corresponding odds ratios were significantly increased for monetary incentives (1.36; 95% CI 1.30-1.88), and when abridging the questionnaire (1.15; 95% CI 1.01-1.31). However, partial nonresponse and treatment outcome were independent of the two factors. CONCLUSION: Incentives and a shorter questionnaire led to higher return rates but did not affect partial nonresponse and self-report of treatment outcome in a randomized postal survey.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 60

SP - 1263

EP - 1270

JO - J CLIN EPIDEMIOL

JF - J CLIN EPIDEMIOL

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 12

M1 - 12

ER -