Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments

Standard

Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments. / Spiess, Andrej-Nikolai; Deutschmann, Claudia; Burdukiewicz, Michał; Himmelreich, Ralf; Klat, Katharina; Schierack, Peter; Rödiger, Stefan.

in: CLIN CHEM, Jahrgang 61, Nr. 2, 02.2015, S. 379-88.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Spiess, A-N, Deutschmann, C, Burdukiewicz, M, Himmelreich, R, Klat, K, Schierack, P & Rödiger, S 2015, 'Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments', CLIN CHEM, Jg. 61, Nr. 2, S. 379-88. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2014.230656

APA

Spiess, A-N., Deutschmann, C., Burdukiewicz, M., Himmelreich, R., Klat, K., Schierack, P., & Rödiger, S. (2015). Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments. CLIN CHEM, 61(2), 379-88. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2014.230656

Vancouver

Spiess A-N, Deutschmann C, Burdukiewicz M, Himmelreich R, Klat K, Schierack P et al. Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments. CLIN CHEM. 2015 Feb;61(2):379-88. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2014.230656

Bibtex

@article{e3f862fbd3ed440da825d482045f1a48,
title = "Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Quantification cycle (Cq) and amplification efficiency (AE) are parameters mathematically extracted from raw data to characterize quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions and quantify the copy number in a sample. Little attention has been paid to the effects of preprocessing and the use of smoothing or filtering approaches to compensate for noisy data. Existing algorithms largely are taken for granted, and it is unclear which of the various methods is most informative. We investigated the effect of smoothing and filtering algorithms on amplification curve data.METHODS: We obtained published high-replicate qPCR data sets from standard block thermocyclers and other cycler platforms and statistically evaluated the impact of smoothing on Cq and AE.RESULTS: Our results indicate that selected smoothing algorithms affect estimates of Cq and AE considerably. The commonly used moving average filter performed worst in all qPCR scenarios. The Savitzky-Golay smoother, cubic splines, and Whittaker smoother resulted overall in the least bias in our setting and exhibited low sensitivity to differences in qPCR AE, whereas other smoothers, such as running mean, introduced an AE-dependent bias.CONCLUSIONS: The selection of a smoothing algorithm is an important step in developing data analysis pipelines for real-time PCR experiments. We offer guidelines for selection of an appropriate smoothing algorithm in diagnostic qPCR applications. The findings of our study were implemented in the R packages chipPCR and qpcR as a basis for the implementation of an analytical strategy.",
keywords = "Algorithms, DNA, Monte Carlo Method, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Regression Analysis",
author = "Andrej-Nikolai Spiess and Claudia Deutschmann and Micha{\l} Burdukiewicz and Ralf Himmelreich and Katharina Klat and Peter Schierack and Stefan R{\"o}diger",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1373/clinchem.2014.230656",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "379--88",
journal = "CLIN CHEM",
issn = "0009-9147",
publisher = "American Association for Clinical Chemistry Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of smoothing on parameter estimation in quantitative DNA amplification experiments

AU - Spiess, Andrej-Nikolai

AU - Deutschmann, Claudia

AU - Burdukiewicz, Michał

AU - Himmelreich, Ralf

AU - Klat, Katharina

AU - Schierack, Peter

AU - Rödiger, Stefan

N1 - © 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - BACKGROUND: Quantification cycle (Cq) and amplification efficiency (AE) are parameters mathematically extracted from raw data to characterize quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions and quantify the copy number in a sample. Little attention has been paid to the effects of preprocessing and the use of smoothing or filtering approaches to compensate for noisy data. Existing algorithms largely are taken for granted, and it is unclear which of the various methods is most informative. We investigated the effect of smoothing and filtering algorithms on amplification curve data.METHODS: We obtained published high-replicate qPCR data sets from standard block thermocyclers and other cycler platforms and statistically evaluated the impact of smoothing on Cq and AE.RESULTS: Our results indicate that selected smoothing algorithms affect estimates of Cq and AE considerably. The commonly used moving average filter performed worst in all qPCR scenarios. The Savitzky-Golay smoother, cubic splines, and Whittaker smoother resulted overall in the least bias in our setting and exhibited low sensitivity to differences in qPCR AE, whereas other smoothers, such as running mean, introduced an AE-dependent bias.CONCLUSIONS: The selection of a smoothing algorithm is an important step in developing data analysis pipelines for real-time PCR experiments. We offer guidelines for selection of an appropriate smoothing algorithm in diagnostic qPCR applications. The findings of our study were implemented in the R packages chipPCR and qpcR as a basis for the implementation of an analytical strategy.

AB - BACKGROUND: Quantification cycle (Cq) and amplification efficiency (AE) are parameters mathematically extracted from raw data to characterize quantitative PCR (qPCR) reactions and quantify the copy number in a sample. Little attention has been paid to the effects of preprocessing and the use of smoothing or filtering approaches to compensate for noisy data. Existing algorithms largely are taken for granted, and it is unclear which of the various methods is most informative. We investigated the effect of smoothing and filtering algorithms on amplification curve data.METHODS: We obtained published high-replicate qPCR data sets from standard block thermocyclers and other cycler platforms and statistically evaluated the impact of smoothing on Cq and AE.RESULTS: Our results indicate that selected smoothing algorithms affect estimates of Cq and AE considerably. The commonly used moving average filter performed worst in all qPCR scenarios. The Savitzky-Golay smoother, cubic splines, and Whittaker smoother resulted overall in the least bias in our setting and exhibited low sensitivity to differences in qPCR AE, whereas other smoothers, such as running mean, introduced an AE-dependent bias.CONCLUSIONS: The selection of a smoothing algorithm is an important step in developing data analysis pipelines for real-time PCR experiments. We offer guidelines for selection of an appropriate smoothing algorithm in diagnostic qPCR applications. The findings of our study were implemented in the R packages chipPCR and qpcR as a basis for the implementation of an analytical strategy.

KW - Algorithms

KW - DNA

KW - Monte Carlo Method

KW - Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

KW - Regression Analysis

U2 - 10.1373/clinchem.2014.230656

DO - 10.1373/clinchem.2014.230656

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25477537

VL - 61

SP - 379

EP - 388

JO - CLIN CHEM

JF - CLIN CHEM

SN - 0009-9147

IS - 2

ER -