PortalPublikationenImpact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quali...

Impact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quality of life over a period of 10 years - a randomized controlled trial

Standard

Impact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quality of life over a period of 10 years - a randomized controlled trial. / Reissmann, Daniel R; Wolfart, Stefan; John, Mike T; Marré, Birgit; Walter, Michael; Kern, Matthias; Kohal, Ralf; Nothdurft, Frank; Stark, Helmut; Schierz, Oliver; Wöstmann, Bernd; Hannak, Wolfgang; Mundt, Torsten; Pospiech, Peter; Boldt, Julian; Edelhoff, Daniel; Busche, Eckhard; Jahn, Florentine; Luthardt, Ralph G; Hartmann, Sinsa; Heydecke, Guido.

in: J DENT, Jahrgang 80, 01.2019, S. 55-62.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Reissmann, DR, Wolfart, S, John, MT, Marré, B, Walter, M, Kern, M, Kohal, R, Nothdurft, F, Stark, H, Schierz, O, Wöstmann, B, Hannak, W, Mundt, T, Pospiech, P, Boldt, J, Edelhoff, D, Busche, E, Jahn, F, Luthardt, RG, Hartmann, S & Heydecke, G 2019, 'Impact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quality of life over a period of 10 years - a randomized controlled trial', J DENT, Jg. 80, S. 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.006

APA

Reissmann, D. R., Wolfart, S., John, M. T., Marré, B., Walter, M., Kern, M., Kohal, R., Nothdurft, F., Stark, H., Schierz, O., Wöstmann, B., Hannak, W., Mundt, T., Pospiech, P., Boldt, J., Edelhoff, D., Busche, E., Jahn, F., Luthardt, R. G., ... Heydecke, G. (2019). Impact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quality of life over a period of 10 years - a randomized controlled trial. J DENT, 80, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.006

Vancouver

Reissmann DR, Wolfart S, John MT, Marré B, Walter M, Kern M et al. Impact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quality of life over a period of 10 years - a randomized controlled trial. J DENT. 2019 Jan;80:55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.006

Bibtex

@article{78975520f4c54b589576b9ca70aa5ce2,
title = "Impact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quality of life over a period of 10 years - a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with either molar replacement by partial removable dental prostheses (PRDP) or with restored shortened dental arches (SDA) over a period of 10 years.METHODS: In this multi-center RCT, a consecutive sample of 215 patients with bilateral molar loss in at least one jaw was initially recruited in 14 prosthodontic departments. Of those patients, 150 could be randomly allocated to the treatment groups (SDA: n = 71; PRDP: n = 79), received the allocated treatment, and were available for follow-up assessments. OHRQoL was assessed using the 49-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) before treatment (baseline) and at follow-ups after treatment (4-8 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 96, and 120 months). To investigate the course of OHRQoL over time, we longitudinally modelled treatment and time effects using mixed-effects models.RESULTS: OHRQoL substantially improved from baseline to first follow-up in both groups indicated by a mean decrease in OHIP scores of 20.0 points (95%-CI: 12.5-27.5). When compared to the SDA group, OHRQoL in the PRDP group was not significantly different (-0.6 OHIP points; 95%-CI: -7.1 to 5.9) during the study period when assuming a constant time effect. OHRQoL remained stable over the 10 years with a statistically insignificant time effect (p = 0.848).CONCLUSIONS: For patients requesting prosthodontic treatment for their lost molars, treatments with SDA or PRDP improve clinically relevantly OHRQoL and maintain it over a period of 10 years with no option being superior to the other.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Since there was no significant difference between the two treatment options over the observation period of 10 years, and since results have stayed stable over time, patients can be informed that both treatment concepts are equivalent concerning OHRQoL.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Reissmann, {Daniel R} and Stefan Wolfart and John, {Mike T} and Birgit Marr{\'e} and Michael Walter and Matthias Kern and Ralf Kohal and Frank Nothdurft and Helmut Stark and Oliver Schierz and Bernd W{\"o}stmann and Wolfgang Hannak and Torsten Mundt and Peter Pospiech and Julian Boldt and Daniel Edelhoff and Eckhard Busche and Florentine Jahn and Luthardt, {Ralph G} and Sinsa Hartmann and Guido Heydecke",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.006",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "55--62",
journal = "J DENT",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of shortened dental arch on oral health-related quality of life over a period of 10 years - a randomized controlled trial

AU - Reissmann, Daniel R

AU - Wolfart, Stefan

AU - John, Mike T

AU - Marré, Birgit

AU - Walter, Michael

AU - Kern, Matthias

AU - Kohal, Ralf

AU - Nothdurft, Frank

AU - Stark, Helmut

AU - Schierz, Oliver

AU - Wöstmann, Bernd

AU - Hannak, Wolfgang

AU - Mundt, Torsten

AU - Pospiech, Peter

AU - Boldt, Julian

AU - Edelhoff, Daniel

AU - Busche, Eckhard

AU - Jahn, Florentine

AU - Luthardt, Ralph G

AU - Hartmann, Sinsa

AU - Heydecke, Guido

N1 - Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with either molar replacement by partial removable dental prostheses (PRDP) or with restored shortened dental arches (SDA) over a period of 10 years.METHODS: In this multi-center RCT, a consecutive sample of 215 patients with bilateral molar loss in at least one jaw was initially recruited in 14 prosthodontic departments. Of those patients, 150 could be randomly allocated to the treatment groups (SDA: n = 71; PRDP: n = 79), received the allocated treatment, and were available for follow-up assessments. OHRQoL was assessed using the 49-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) before treatment (baseline) and at follow-ups after treatment (4-8 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 96, and 120 months). To investigate the course of OHRQoL over time, we longitudinally modelled treatment and time effects using mixed-effects models.RESULTS: OHRQoL substantially improved from baseline to first follow-up in both groups indicated by a mean decrease in OHIP scores of 20.0 points (95%-CI: 12.5-27.5). When compared to the SDA group, OHRQoL in the PRDP group was not significantly different (-0.6 OHIP points; 95%-CI: -7.1 to 5.9) during the study period when assuming a constant time effect. OHRQoL remained stable over the 10 years with a statistically insignificant time effect (p = 0.848).CONCLUSIONS: For patients requesting prosthodontic treatment for their lost molars, treatments with SDA or PRDP improve clinically relevantly OHRQoL and maintain it over a period of 10 years with no option being superior to the other.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Since there was no significant difference between the two treatment options over the observation period of 10 years, and since results have stayed stable over time, patients can be informed that both treatment concepts are equivalent concerning OHRQoL.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with either molar replacement by partial removable dental prostheses (PRDP) or with restored shortened dental arches (SDA) over a period of 10 years.METHODS: In this multi-center RCT, a consecutive sample of 215 patients with bilateral molar loss in at least one jaw was initially recruited in 14 prosthodontic departments. Of those patients, 150 could be randomly allocated to the treatment groups (SDA: n = 71; PRDP: n = 79), received the allocated treatment, and were available for follow-up assessments. OHRQoL was assessed using the 49-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) before treatment (baseline) and at follow-ups after treatment (4-8 weeks and 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 96, and 120 months). To investigate the course of OHRQoL over time, we longitudinally modelled treatment and time effects using mixed-effects models.RESULTS: OHRQoL substantially improved from baseline to first follow-up in both groups indicated by a mean decrease in OHIP scores of 20.0 points (95%-CI: 12.5-27.5). When compared to the SDA group, OHRQoL in the PRDP group was not significantly different (-0.6 OHIP points; 95%-CI: -7.1 to 5.9) during the study period when assuming a constant time effect. OHRQoL remained stable over the 10 years with a statistically insignificant time effect (p = 0.848).CONCLUSIONS: For patients requesting prosthodontic treatment for their lost molars, treatments with SDA or PRDP improve clinically relevantly OHRQoL and maintain it over a period of 10 years with no option being superior to the other.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Since there was no significant difference between the two treatment options over the observation period of 10 years, and since results have stayed stable over time, patients can be informed that both treatment concepts are equivalent concerning OHRQoL.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.006

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30355509

VL - 80

SP - 55

EP - 62

JO - J DENT

JF - J DENT

SN - 0300-5712

ER -