Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens

Tim Hacker; Guido Heydecke; Daniel R Reissmann

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013

Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens

Standard

Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens. / Hacker, Tim; Heydecke, Guido; Reissmann, Daniel R.

in: J DENT, Jahrgang 43, Nr. 1, 01.01.2015, S. 51-7.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Hacker, T, Heydecke, G & Reissmann, DR 2015, 'Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens', J DENT, Jg. 43, Nr. 1, S. 51-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013

APA

Hacker, T., Heydecke, G., & Reissmann, D. R. (2015). Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens. J DENT, 43(1), 51-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013

Vancouver

Hacker T, Heydecke G, Reissmann DR. Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens. J DENT. 2015 Jan 1;43(1):51-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013

Bibtex

@article{6caa8a4d77184c77977047c50ac1801d,

title = "Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens",

abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To assess patient-perceived process-related quality of care in patients undergoing different prosthodontic treatments, and to investigate whether perceived burdens are related to specific procedures during prosthodontic treatments, i.e., to specific treatment components.METHODS: In this non-randomised prospective intervention study, 104 dental patients (mean age: 52.2±13.9 years, 50% female) were included. Burdens during treatments with fixed dental prostheses (FDP, n=90), removable dental prostheses (RDP, n=10), and complete dentures (CD; n=4) were assessed with the Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q). The BiPD-Q total score was calculated as mean of all 25 items, and subscale scores were derived from items corresponding to six specific treatment components (anesthesia, preparation, impression, provisional care/try-in, fixation, global perception), with values ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Subscale scores were compared by using repeated-measures ANOVA, paired t-tests, and effect sizes, to identify treatment components with highest burdens.RESULTS: Mean BiPD-Q total score was 22.1, ranging from 8.6 for patients with CD to 24.0 for FDP patients. Perceived burdens differed significantly between treatment components, with highest burdens for anesthesia (score: 34.0), followed by preparation (score: 26.8) and impression (score: 24.7). When subscale score for anesthesia was compared to scores for other treatment components, effect sizes were medium to large.CONCLUSION: While prosthodontic treatment is overall perceived as only moderately burdening, specific treatment components differ significantly in perceived burdens.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Anesthesia, preparation, and impression are treatment components with most unpleasant perceptions, offering the highest potential for improvements for patient-perceived process-related quality of care in prosthetic dentistry.",

author = "Tim Hacker and Guido Heydecke and Reissmann, {Daniel R}",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "51--7",

journal = "J DENT",

issn = "0300-5712",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens

AU - Hacker, Tim

AU - Heydecke, Guido

AU - Reissmann, Daniel R

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess patient-perceived process-related quality of care in patients undergoing different prosthodontic treatments, and to investigate whether perceived burdens are related to specific procedures during prosthodontic treatments, i.e., to specific treatment components.METHODS: In this non-randomised prospective intervention study, 104 dental patients (mean age: 52.2±13.9 years, 50% female) were included. Burdens during treatments with fixed dental prostheses (FDP, n=90), removable dental prostheses (RDP, n=10), and complete dentures (CD; n=4) were assessed with the Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q). The BiPD-Q total score was calculated as mean of all 25 items, and subscale scores were derived from items corresponding to six specific treatment components (anesthesia, preparation, impression, provisional care/try-in, fixation, global perception), with values ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Subscale scores were compared by using repeated-measures ANOVA, paired t-tests, and effect sizes, to identify treatment components with highest burdens.RESULTS: Mean BiPD-Q total score was 22.1, ranging from 8.6 for patients with CD to 24.0 for FDP patients. Perceived burdens differed significantly between treatment components, with highest burdens for anesthesia (score: 34.0), followed by preparation (score: 26.8) and impression (score: 24.7). When subscale score for anesthesia was compared to scores for other treatment components, effect sizes were medium to large.CONCLUSION: While prosthodontic treatment is overall perceived as only moderately burdening, specific treatment components differ significantly in perceived burdens.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Anesthesia, preparation, and impression are treatment components with most unpleasant perceptions, offering the highest potential for improvements for patient-perceived process-related quality of care in prosthetic dentistry.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess patient-perceived process-related quality of care in patients undergoing different prosthodontic treatments, and to investigate whether perceived burdens are related to specific procedures during prosthodontic treatments, i.e., to specific treatment components.METHODS: In this non-randomised prospective intervention study, 104 dental patients (mean age: 52.2±13.9 years, 50% female) were included. Burdens during treatments with fixed dental prostheses (FDP, n=90), removable dental prostheses (RDP, n=10), and complete dentures (CD; n=4) were assessed with the Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q). The BiPD-Q total score was calculated as mean of all 25 items, and subscale scores were derived from items corresponding to six specific treatment components (anesthesia, preparation, impression, provisional care/try-in, fixation, global perception), with values ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Subscale scores were compared by using repeated-measures ANOVA, paired t-tests, and effect sizes, to identify treatment components with highest burdens.RESULTS: Mean BiPD-Q total score was 22.1, ranging from 8.6 for patients with CD to 24.0 for FDP patients. Perceived burdens differed significantly between treatment components, with highest burdens for anesthesia (score: 34.0), followed by preparation (score: 26.8) and impression (score: 24.7). When subscale score for anesthesia was compared to scores for other treatment components, effect sizes were medium to large.CONCLUSION: While prosthodontic treatment is overall perceived as only moderately burdening, specific treatment components differ significantly in perceived burdens.CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Anesthesia, preparation, and impression are treatment components with most unpleasant perceptions, offering the highest potential for improvements for patient-perceived process-related quality of care in prosthetic dentistry.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.013

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25446242

VL - 43

SP - 51

EP - 57

JO - J DENT

JF - J DENT

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 1

ER -