Impact of preoperative risk on metastatic progression and cancer-specific mortality in patients with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy
Standard
Impact of preoperative risk on metastatic progression and cancer-specific mortality in patients with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. / Boehm, Katharina; Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi; Rosenbaum, Clemens; Brandi, Laurenz S; Budäus, Lars; Graefen, Markus; Huland, Hartwig; Haferkamp, Axel; Tilki, Derya.
in: BJU INT, Jahrgang 120, Nr. 5, 11.2017, S. 666-672.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of preoperative risk on metastatic progression and cancer-specific mortality in patients with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy
AU - Boehm, Katharina
AU - Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
AU - Rosenbaum, Clemens
AU - Brandi, Laurenz S
AU - Budäus, Lars
AU - Graefen, Markus
AU - Huland, Hartwig
AU - Haferkamp, Axel
AU - Tilki, Derya
N1 - © 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of preoperative risk category on metastatic disease and prostate cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy (RP).PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 6 943 patients who underwent RP at a European tertiary centre were analysed. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastatic disease and CSM were assessed for patients with adverse pathology at RP, and stratified according to preoperative low- vs intermediate-/high-risk PCa groups. Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence, Cox regression and competing risk regression analyses were performed.RESULTS: In patients with extracapsular extension, the metastatic disease rate was 1.6% vs 8% (P < 0.001) and the CSM rate was 2% vs 5% (P = 0.041) for low vs intermediate-/high-risk patients, respectively, at 10 years. In patients with pathological Gleason score ≥3+4, the metastatic disease rate was 3.0% vs 12% (P < 0.001) and the CSM rate was 3% vs 8%, respectively (P < 0.001). In patients with positive surgical margins (PSMs), the metastatic disease rate was 2.9% vs 15% (P < 0.001) and the CSM rate was 4% vs 10%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Low-risk status was a predictive factor for metastatic disease in patients with pathological Gleason score ≥3+4 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51), pathological Gleason score ≥4+3 (HR 0.41) and PSMs (HR 0.46) and was a predictive factor for CSM risk in patients with pathological Gleason score ≥3+4 (HR 0.62).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low-risk PCa were at significantly lower risk of metastatic disease and CSM than their intermediate-/high-risk counterparts, when adverse pathological features were identified at RP. This should be emphasized in the decision-making process after RP.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of preoperative risk category on metastatic disease and prostate cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy (RP).PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 6 943 patients who underwent RP at a European tertiary centre were analysed. Biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastatic disease and CSM were assessed for patients with adverse pathology at RP, and stratified according to preoperative low- vs intermediate-/high-risk PCa groups. Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence, Cox regression and competing risk regression analyses were performed.RESULTS: In patients with extracapsular extension, the metastatic disease rate was 1.6% vs 8% (P < 0.001) and the CSM rate was 2% vs 5% (P = 0.041) for low vs intermediate-/high-risk patients, respectively, at 10 years. In patients with pathological Gleason score ≥3+4, the metastatic disease rate was 3.0% vs 12% (P < 0.001) and the CSM rate was 3% vs 8%, respectively (P < 0.001). In patients with positive surgical margins (PSMs), the metastatic disease rate was 2.9% vs 15% (P < 0.001) and the CSM rate was 4% vs 10%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Low-risk status was a predictive factor for metastatic disease in patients with pathological Gleason score ≥3+4 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51), pathological Gleason score ≥4+3 (HR 0.41) and PSMs (HR 0.46) and was a predictive factor for CSM risk in patients with pathological Gleason score ≥3+4 (HR 0.62).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low-risk PCa were at significantly lower risk of metastatic disease and CSM than their intermediate-/high-risk counterparts, when adverse pathological features were identified at RP. This should be emphasized in the decision-making process after RP.
KW - Aged
KW - Cohort Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Multivariate Analysis
KW - Prostate-Specific Antigen
KW - Prostatectomy
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1111/bju.13887
DO - 10.1111/bju.13887
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 28437038
VL - 120
SP - 666
EP - 672
JO - BJU INT
JF - BJU INT
SN - 1464-4096
IS - 5
ER -