PortalPublikationenImpact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on ass...

Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination

Standard

Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination. / Schierz, Oliver; Wagner, Philipp; Rauch, Angelika; Reissmann, Daniel R.

in: CRANIO, Jahrgang 37, Nr. 1, 01.01.2019, S. 60-67.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Schierz, O, Wagner, P, Rauch, A & Reissmann, DR 2019, 'Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination', CRANIO, Jg. 37, Nr. 1, S. 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060

APA

Schierz, O., Wagner, P., Rauch, A., & Reissmann, D. R. (2019). Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination. CRANIO, 37(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060

Vancouver

Schierz O, Wagner P, Rauch A, Reissmann DR. Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination. CRANIO. 2019 Jan 1;37(1):60-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060

Bibtex

@article{32feb7c89c9944ddaf839c819a482a66,
title = "Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Valid and reliable recording is a key requirement for accurately simulating individual jaw movements.METHODS: Horizontal condylar inclination (HCI) and Bennett's angle were measured using a digital jaw tracker (Cadiax{\textregistered} Compact 2) in 27 young adults. Three mounting methods (paraocclusal tray adapter, periocclusal tray adapter, and tray adapter with mandibular clamp) were tested.RESULTS: The mean values of the HCI differed by up to 10° between the mounting methods; however, the values for Bennett's angle did not differ substantially. While the intersession reliability of the Bennett's angle assessment did not depend on the mounting method, the reliability of the HCI assessment was only fair to good for the paraocclusal mounting method but poor for both periocclusal mounting methods.DISCUSSION: For attaching the tracing bow of jaw trackers to the mandible, a paraocclusal tray adapter should be applied, to achieve the most reliable results.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Oliver Schierz and Philipp Wagner and Angelika Rauch and Reissmann, {Daniel R}",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "60--67",
journal = "CRANIO",
issn = "0886-9634",
publisher = "Chroma, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of mounting methods in computerized axiography on assessment of condylar inclination

AU - Schierz, Oliver

AU - Wagner, Philipp

AU - Rauch, Angelika

AU - Reissmann, Daniel R

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Valid and reliable recording is a key requirement for accurately simulating individual jaw movements.METHODS: Horizontal condylar inclination (HCI) and Bennett's angle were measured using a digital jaw tracker (Cadiax® Compact 2) in 27 young adults. Three mounting methods (paraocclusal tray adapter, periocclusal tray adapter, and tray adapter with mandibular clamp) were tested.RESULTS: The mean values of the HCI differed by up to 10° between the mounting methods; however, the values for Bennett's angle did not differ substantially. While the intersession reliability of the Bennett's angle assessment did not depend on the mounting method, the reliability of the HCI assessment was only fair to good for the paraocclusal mounting method but poor for both periocclusal mounting methods.DISCUSSION: For attaching the tracing bow of jaw trackers to the mandible, a paraocclusal tray adapter should be applied, to achieve the most reliable results.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Valid and reliable recording is a key requirement for accurately simulating individual jaw movements.METHODS: Horizontal condylar inclination (HCI) and Bennett's angle were measured using a digital jaw tracker (Cadiax® Compact 2) in 27 young adults. Three mounting methods (paraocclusal tray adapter, periocclusal tray adapter, and tray adapter with mandibular clamp) were tested.RESULTS: The mean values of the HCI differed by up to 10° between the mounting methods; however, the values for Bennett's angle did not differ substantially. While the intersession reliability of the Bennett's angle assessment did not depend on the mounting method, the reliability of the HCI assessment was only fair to good for the paraocclusal mounting method but poor for both periocclusal mounting methods.DISCUSSION: For attaching the tracing bow of jaw trackers to the mandible, a paraocclusal tray adapter should be applied, to achieve the most reliable results.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060

DO - 10.1080/08869634.2017.1367060

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28854058

VL - 37

SP - 60

EP - 67

JO - CRANIO

JF - CRANIO

SN - 0886-9634

IS - 1

ER -