Impact of administration mode on Oro-facial Appearance assessment using the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale
Standard
Impact of administration mode on Oro-facial Appearance assessment using the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale. / Neophytou, Sophia; Sierwald, Ira; Michelaki, Ioanna; Reissmann, Daniel R.
in: J ORAL REHABIL, Jahrgang 45, Nr. 12, 12.2018, S. 932-938.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of administration mode on Oro-facial Appearance assessment using the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale
AU - Neophytou, Sophia
AU - Sierwald, Ira
AU - Michelaki, Ioanna
AU - Reissmann, Daniel R
N1 - © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: Oro-facial Appearance is increasingly recognised as an important component of patient-reported outcomes in dentistry. While the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale (OES) has sufficient psychometric properties to characterise dental patient's global assessment of Oro-facial Appearance, the equivalence of alternative methods of administration has not been demonstrated so far.OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to investigate whether and to what extent method of administration affects OES scores.METHODS: Participants were recruited as convenience sample of 42 adult dental patients registered for a regular recall visit and with no actual need of dental interventions. Oro-facial Appearance was assessed using the German version of the OES applying three methods of administration: (a) face-to-face interview, (b) self-administered questionnaire and (c) telephone interview, in a randomised order with a period of about one week between assessments.RESULTS: Oro-facial Esthetic Scale summary scores did not differ substantially or statistically significantly between the different methods of administration (two-way ANOVA; P = 0.209). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for pairwise comparisons of administration modes ranged from 0.67 to 0.84 indicating fair to excellent test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was satisfactory with lower limits of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 for the administration modes. Correlations of the OES summary score with a single item assessing global Oro-facial Appearance supported convergent validity with lower limits of the CI of the correlation coefficients ranging between 0.58 and 0.75.CONCLUSION: The administration mode has no significant impact on Oro-facial Appearance assessment when using the OES.
AB - BACKGROUND: Oro-facial Appearance is increasingly recognised as an important component of patient-reported outcomes in dentistry. While the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale (OES) has sufficient psychometric properties to characterise dental patient's global assessment of Oro-facial Appearance, the equivalence of alternative methods of administration has not been demonstrated so far.OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to investigate whether and to what extent method of administration affects OES scores.METHODS: Participants were recruited as convenience sample of 42 adult dental patients registered for a regular recall visit and with no actual need of dental interventions. Oro-facial Appearance was assessed using the German version of the OES applying three methods of administration: (a) face-to-face interview, (b) self-administered questionnaire and (c) telephone interview, in a randomised order with a period of about one week between assessments.RESULTS: Oro-facial Esthetic Scale summary scores did not differ substantially or statistically significantly between the different methods of administration (two-way ANOVA; P = 0.209). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for pairwise comparisons of administration modes ranged from 0.67 to 0.84 indicating fair to excellent test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was satisfactory with lower limits of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 for the administration modes. Correlations of the OES summary score with a single item assessing global Oro-facial Appearance supported convergent validity with lower limits of the CI of the correlation coefficients ranging between 0.58 and 0.75.CONCLUSION: The administration mode has no significant impact on Oro-facial Appearance assessment when using the OES.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1111/joor.12715
DO - 10.1111/joor.12715
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 30187504
VL - 45
SP - 932
EP - 938
JO - J ORAL REHABIL
JF - J ORAL REHABIL
SN - 0305-182X
IS - 12
ER -