Immunotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: status quo and the future

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immunotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: status quo and the future

AU - Necchi, Andrea

AU - Rink, Michael

AU - Giannatempo, Patrizia

AU - Raggi, Daniele

AU - Xylinas, Evanguelos

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment paradigm of urothelial carcinoma has been revolutionized by the advent of multiple anti-programmed-cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies. Significant improvements have been obtained in the locally advanced or metastatic stage, which was lacking of therapeutic standards. This review reports key findings from completed and ongoing clinical trials that highlight the potential of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in this disease.RECENT FINDINGS: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies have shown efficacy and safety in patients with urothelial carcinoma, regardless of their prognostic features. Efficacy was similar across different compounds, with objective responses that approximate 20%, with some differences favoring PD-L1-expressing patients. Typically, responding patients have good chances of achieving durable response, but biomarkers predictive of therapeutic effect are lacking. To date, evidences from randomized studies are limited to the second-line, postplatinum therapy.SUMMARY: Despite the activity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is well established in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, multiple gray zones still exist regarding their optimal use in clinical practice. These uncertainties are related to patient and treatment-related criteria, to the optimal duration of treatment, including combination or sequence with standard chemotherapy. Special issues are represented by pseudoprogression or hyperprogression. Generally, enhanced predictive tools are needed and a myriad of further investigations are underway.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment paradigm of urothelial carcinoma has been revolutionized by the advent of multiple anti-programmed-cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies. Significant improvements have been obtained in the locally advanced or metastatic stage, which was lacking of therapeutic standards. This review reports key findings from completed and ongoing clinical trials that highlight the potential of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in this disease.RECENT FINDINGS: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies have shown efficacy and safety in patients with urothelial carcinoma, regardless of their prognostic features. Efficacy was similar across different compounds, with objective responses that approximate 20%, with some differences favoring PD-L1-expressing patients. Typically, responding patients have good chances of achieving durable response, but biomarkers predictive of therapeutic effect are lacking. To date, evidences from randomized studies are limited to the second-line, postplatinum therapy.SUMMARY: Despite the activity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is well established in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, multiple gray zones still exist regarding their optimal use in clinical practice. These uncertainties are related to patient and treatment-related criteria, to the optimal duration of treatment, including combination or sequence with standard chemotherapy. Special issues are represented by pseudoprogression or hyperprogression. Generally, enhanced predictive tools are needed and a myriad of further investigations are underway.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000457

DO - 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000457

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 29028766

VL - 28

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - CURR OPIN UROL

JF - CURR OPIN UROL

SN - 0963-0643

IS - 1

ER -