Immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients presenting with acute AIDS-defining events (toxoplasmosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii-pneumonia): a prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study (IDEAL-study)

Standard

Immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients presenting with acute AIDS-defining events (toxoplasmosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii-pneumonia): a prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study (IDEAL-study). / Schäfer, Guido; Hoffmann, Christian; Arasteh, Keikawus; Schürmann, Dirk; Stephan, Christoph; Jensen, Björn; Stoll, Matthias; Bogner, Johannes R; Faetkenheuer, Gerd; Rockstroh, Jürgen; Klinker, Hartwig; Härter, Georg; Stöhr, Albrecht; Degen, Olaf; Bibiza-Freiwald, Eric; Hüfner, Anja; Jordan, Sabine; Schulze Zur Wiesch, Julian; Addo, Marylyn; Lohse, Ansgar W; van Lunzen, Jan; Schmiedel, Stefan; IDEAL study group.

in: AIDS RES THER, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 1, 15.11.2019, S. 34.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5a36be2411fd4d1f9cc5c5c6002663b7,
title = "Immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients presenting with acute AIDS-defining events (toxoplasmosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii-pneumonia): a prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study (IDEAL-study)",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical outcomes after either immediate or deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients, presenting late with pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma encephalitis (TE).METHODS: Phase IV, multicenter, prospective, randomized open-label clinical trial. Patients were randomized into an immediate therapy arm (starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) within 7 days after initiation of OI treatment) versus a deferred arm (starting ART after completing the OI-therapy). All patients were followed for 24 weeks. The rates of clinical progression (death, new or relapsing opportunistic infections (OI) and other grade 4 clinical endpoints) were compared, using a combined primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were hospitalization rates after completion of OI treatment, incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), virologic and immunological outcome, adherence to proteinase-inhibitor based antiretroviral therapy (ART) protocol and quality of life.RESULTS: 61 patients (11 patients suffering TE, 50 with PCP) were enrolled. No differences between the two therapy groups in all examined primary and secondary endpoints could be identified: immunological and virologic outcome was similar in both groups, there was no significant difference in the incidence of IRIS (11 and 10 cases), furthermore 9 events (combined endpoint of death, new/relapsing OI and grade 4 events) occurred in each group.CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study supports the notion that immediate initiation of ART with a ritonavir-boosted proteinase-inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is safe and has no negative effects on incidence of disease progression or IRIS, nor on immunological and virologic outcomes or on quality of life.",
author = "Guido Sch{\"a}fer and Christian Hoffmann and Keikawus Arasteh and Dirk Sch{\"u}rmann and Christoph Stephan and Bj{\"o}rn Jensen and Matthias Stoll and Bogner, {Johannes R} and Gerd Faetkenheuer and J{\"u}rgen Rockstroh and Hartwig Klinker and Georg H{\"a}rter and Albrecht St{\"o}hr and Olaf Degen and Eric Bibiza-Freiwald and Anja H{\"u}fner and Sabine Jordan and {Schulze Zur Wiesch}, Julian and Marylyn Addo and Lohse, {Ansgar W} and {van Lunzen}, Jan and Stefan Schmiedel and {IDEAL study group}",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1186/s12981-019-0250-2",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "34",
journal = "AIDS RES THER",
issn = "1742-6405",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients presenting with acute AIDS-defining events (toxoplasmosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii-pneumonia): a prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study (IDEAL-study)

AU - Schäfer, Guido

AU - Hoffmann, Christian

AU - Arasteh, Keikawus

AU - Schürmann, Dirk

AU - Stephan, Christoph

AU - Jensen, Björn

AU - Stoll, Matthias

AU - Bogner, Johannes R

AU - Faetkenheuer, Gerd

AU - Rockstroh, Jürgen

AU - Klinker, Hartwig

AU - Härter, Georg

AU - Stöhr, Albrecht

AU - Degen, Olaf

AU - Bibiza-Freiwald, Eric

AU - Hüfner, Anja

AU - Jordan, Sabine

AU - Schulze Zur Wiesch, Julian

AU - Addo, Marylyn

AU - Lohse, Ansgar W

AU - van Lunzen, Jan

AU - Schmiedel, Stefan

AU - IDEAL study group

PY - 2019/11/15

Y1 - 2019/11/15

N2 - BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical outcomes after either immediate or deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients, presenting late with pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma encephalitis (TE).METHODS: Phase IV, multicenter, prospective, randomized open-label clinical trial. Patients were randomized into an immediate therapy arm (starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) within 7 days after initiation of OI treatment) versus a deferred arm (starting ART after completing the OI-therapy). All patients were followed for 24 weeks. The rates of clinical progression (death, new or relapsing opportunistic infections (OI) and other grade 4 clinical endpoints) were compared, using a combined primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were hospitalization rates after completion of OI treatment, incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), virologic and immunological outcome, adherence to proteinase-inhibitor based antiretroviral therapy (ART) protocol and quality of life.RESULTS: 61 patients (11 patients suffering TE, 50 with PCP) were enrolled. No differences between the two therapy groups in all examined primary and secondary endpoints could be identified: immunological and virologic outcome was similar in both groups, there was no significant difference in the incidence of IRIS (11 and 10 cases), furthermore 9 events (combined endpoint of death, new/relapsing OI and grade 4 events) occurred in each group.CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study supports the notion that immediate initiation of ART with a ritonavir-boosted proteinase-inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is safe and has no negative effects on incidence of disease progression or IRIS, nor on immunological and virologic outcomes or on quality of life.

AB - BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical outcomes after either immediate or deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients, presenting late with pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma encephalitis (TE).METHODS: Phase IV, multicenter, prospective, randomized open-label clinical trial. Patients were randomized into an immediate therapy arm (starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) within 7 days after initiation of OI treatment) versus a deferred arm (starting ART after completing the OI-therapy). All patients were followed for 24 weeks. The rates of clinical progression (death, new or relapsing opportunistic infections (OI) and other grade 4 clinical endpoints) were compared, using a combined primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were hospitalization rates after completion of OI treatment, incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), virologic and immunological outcome, adherence to proteinase-inhibitor based antiretroviral therapy (ART) protocol and quality of life.RESULTS: 61 patients (11 patients suffering TE, 50 with PCP) were enrolled. No differences between the two therapy groups in all examined primary and secondary endpoints could be identified: immunological and virologic outcome was similar in both groups, there was no significant difference in the incidence of IRIS (11 and 10 cases), furthermore 9 events (combined endpoint of death, new/relapsing OI and grade 4 events) occurred in each group.CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this study supports the notion that immediate initiation of ART with a ritonavir-boosted proteinase-inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is safe and has no negative effects on incidence of disease progression or IRIS, nor on immunological and virologic outcomes or on quality of life.

U2 - 10.1186/s12981-019-0250-2

DO - 10.1186/s12981-019-0250-2

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31729999

VL - 16

SP - 34

JO - AIDS RES THER

JF - AIDS RES THER

SN - 1742-6405

IS - 1

ER -